Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pneumonia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:16, 15 October 2018 editCarloFirst (talk | contribs)8 edits Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 15:24, 16 October 2018 edit undoAlucard 16 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,866 edits Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018: Responded to edit request (EPH)Next edit →
Line 62: Line 62:
== Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018 == == Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Pneumonia|answered=no}} {{edit semi-protected|Pneumonia|answered=yes}}
We would like to add Cochrane Evidence We would like to add Cochrane Evidence


Line 76: Line 76:


```` ] (]) 14:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC) ```` ] (]) 14:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' According to the page's protection level you should be able to ]. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details.<!-- Template:ESp --> {{Ping|CarloFirst}} I checked your user rights and according to your rights you should be able to edit this page on your own. If this is a ] edit request please use {{tlx|request edit}} for conflict-of-interest edits. ''']] ]''' 15:24, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:24, 16 October 2018

Former featured articlePneumonia is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articlePneumonia has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 4, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 19, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
November 9, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
November 19, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
August 17, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
November 25, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article
Ideal sources for Misplaced Pages's health content are defined in the guideline Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Pneumonia.

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Translation / Pulmonology Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Top-importance).
Note icon
This article was selected on the Medicine portal as one of Misplaced Pages's best articles related to Medicine.
Note icon
This article is currently the Medicine Collaboration of the Month.

Template:V0.5

Template:WP1.0
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Misplaced Pages rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
Additional comments
Extensive copy and pastes of large sections of Misplaced Pages without appropriate attribution or release under the appropriate license.

Archive 1

Edit Request - Cost

Mohamad Christi created a cost-effective invention to help children with pneumonia in low-income countries. It works similarly to a bubble-cPAP, however, it is made out of a simple shampoo bottle filled with water and some tubing attached. This simple invention cut the price of treatment by approximately 90% which helped parents in low-income countries who could not afford bubble-cPAP treatment for their children with pneumonia.

Shelby.a14 (talk) 18:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Would need a recommendation by say WHO. Also do we have a good ref to support bubble CPAP in pneumonia?
Seems like the trials are ongoing https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883928 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
This review says "More research is needed on the implementation, cost and effectiveness of CPAP in the management of pneumonia and in neonatal care in developing countries" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24165032 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

We would like to add Cochrane Evidence


Review : oral care for Nursing home acquired pneumoria 2018

Conclusion : there is no evidence that one approach to oral care is better than the other one prevening nursing home acquired pneumonia

There is no high quality evidence about the topic.

Liu, Chang; Cao, Yubin; Lin, Jie; Ng, Linda; Needleman, Ian; Walsh, Tanya; Li, Chunjie (2018). "Oral care measures for preventing nursing home‐acquired pneumonia". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (9). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012416.pub2. ISSN 1465-1858.


```` CarloFirst (talk) 14:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. @CarloFirst: I checked your user rights and according to your rights you should be able to edit this page on your own. If this is a Conflict of Interest edit request please use {{request edit}} for conflict-of-interest edits. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 15:24, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
  1. "Health Care". The Economist. Retrieved 11 September 2018.
Categories: