Revision as of 19:43, 4 October 2018 editR. S. Shaw (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,652 edits →Incident: instantaneous deaths unsupported← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:12, 16 October 2018 edit undo71.56.169.162 (talk) The NTSB report concludes as "not determined". The NTSB uses very specific grammar in all probable cause conclusions. The words "deliberate", "suicide" and "intentional" do not appear in the NTSB probable cause conclusion for Flight 990, only "not determined". Review NTSB reports: NTSB Identification: NYC96LA044, SEA06LA052, ATL90LA084, ANC17FA012. When suicide is determined by the NTSB then the report concludes as suicide. All references to suicide are unsupported bias.Tag: references removedNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Image caption = SU-GAP, the aircraft involved in the accident, taxiing at ] in June 1992. | |Image caption = SU-GAP, the aircraft involved in the accident, taxiing at ] in June 1992. | ||
|Date=October 31, 1999 | |Date=October 31, 1999 | ||
|Type=Cause disputed:<br><big>•</big> |
|Type=Cause disputed:<br><big>•</big> Not Determined ] (])<br><big>•</big> Mechanical fault in elevator control system (ECAA)<!--Bullets inserted manually because * was not converting to a bullet--> | ||
|Site=], {{convert|100|km|mi|abbr=on}} south of Nantucket | |Site=], {{convert|100|km|mi|abbr=on}} south of Nantucket | ||
|Fatalities=217 | |Fatalities=217 | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|Survivors=0 | |Survivors=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''EgyptAir Flight 990''' ('''MS990'''/'''MSR990''') was a regularly scheduled flight from ], United States, to ], Egypt, with a stop at ], New York City. On October 31, 1999, the ] operating the route crashed into the Atlantic Ocean about {{convert|60|mi|km|-1}} south of ], Massachusetts, killing all 217 passengers and crew on board. The National Transportation Safety Board |
'''EgyptAir Flight 990''' ('''MS990'''/'''MSR990''') was a regularly scheduled flight from ], United States, to ], Egypt, with a stop at ], New York City. On October 31, 1999, the ] operating the route crashed into the Atlantic Ocean about {{convert|60|mi|km|-1}} south of ], Massachusetts, killing all 217 passengers and crew on board. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the EgyptAir flight 990 accident is the airplane's departure from normal cruise flight and subsequent impact with the Atlantic Ocean as a result of the relief first officer's flight control inputs. The reason for the relief first officer's actions was not determined..<ref name=ntsb>{{cite web|title=Aircraft Accident Brief: EgyptAir Flight 990 |url=http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2002/AAB0201.pdf |publisher=] |date=March 2002 |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/5zlFg31jj?url=http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2002/AAB0201.pdf |archivedate=June 27, 2011 |deadurl=yes |df=dmy }}</ref> | ||
⚫ | As the crash occurred in ], it was investigated by the ]'s Egyptian Civil Aviation Agency (ECAA; {{lang-ar|الهيئة المصرية العامة للطيران المدنى}}) per ] Annex 13. As the ECAA lacked the resources of the much larger U.S. ] (NTSB), the Egyptian government asked the NTSB to handle the investigation. Two weeks after the crash, the NTSB proposed handing the investigation over to the ], as the evidence suggested that a criminal act had taken place and that the crash was intentional rather than accidental. This proposal was unacceptable to the Egyptian authorities, and hence the NTSB continued to lead the investigation. Ahe NTSB concluded "not determined", while the ECAA determined that the incident was caused by mechanical failure of the aircraft's elevator control system.<ref name=ntsb/><ref name=ecaa>{{cite web|title=Report of Investigation of Accident: EgyptAir 990 |url=http://www.ntsb.gov/events/ea990/docket/ecaa_report.pdf |publisher=] |date=June 2001 |accessdate=March 19, 2014 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110622102818/http://www.ntsb.gov/events/ea990/docket/ecaa_report.pdf |archivedate=June 22, 2011 }}</ref> | ||
The ECAA's report suggested several control failure scenarios as possible causes of the crash, focusing on a possible failure of one of the right elevator's power control units.<ref name=ecaa/> While the NTSB's report did not determine a specific reason for the relief first officer's alleged actions, their report stated the impact was "a result of the relief first officer's flight control inputs".<ref name=ntsb/> | |||
⚫ | As the crash occurred in ], it was investigated by the ]'s Egyptian Civil Aviation Agency (ECAA; {{lang-ar|الهيئة المصرية العامة للطيران المدنى}}) per ] Annex 13. As the ECAA lacked the resources of the much larger U.S. ] (NTSB), the Egyptian government asked the NTSB to handle the investigation. Two weeks after the crash, the NTSB proposed handing the investigation over to the ], as the evidence suggested that a criminal act had taken place and that the crash was intentional rather than accidental. This proposal was unacceptable to the Egyptian authorities, and hence the NTSB continued to lead the investigation. |
||
The ECAA's report suggested several control failure scenarios as possible causes of the crash, focusing on a possible failure of one of the right elevator's power control units.<ref name=ecaa/> While the NTSB's report did not determine a specific reason for the relief first officer's alleged actions, their report stated the impact was "a result of the relief first officer's flight control inputs".<ref name=ntsb/><ref>{{cite news |last=Ellison |first=Michael |title=US and Egypt split on fatal plane crash |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/jun/09/egyptaircrash.usa |newspaper=] |date=June 9, 2000 |accessdate=May 1, 2011}}</ref> Supporting its deliberate-act conclusion, the NTSB report determined that no mechanical failure scenario could result in aircraft movements that matched those recorded by the ] (FDR), and that even if any of the failure scenarios put forward by the Egyptian authorities occurred, the aircraft would still have been recoverable because of the 767's redundant elevator control system.<ref name=ntsb/> | |||
==Aircraft, crew, and passengers== | ==Aircraft, crew, and passengers== | ||
Line 108: | Line 107: | ||
===Defection of Hamdi Hanafi Taha=== | ===Defection of Hamdi Hanafi Taha=== | ||
In February 2000, EgyptAir 767 captain Hamdi Hanafi Taha sought political asylum in London after landing his aircraft there. In his statement to British authorities, he claimed to have knowledge of the circumstances behind the crash of Flight 990. He is reported to have said that he wanted to "stop all lies about the disaster," and to put much of the blame on EgyptAir management.<ref name=guardian000508/> | In February 2000, EgyptAir 767 captain Hamdi Hanafi Taha sought political asylum in London after landing his aircraft there. In his statement to British authorities, he claimed to have knowledge of the circumstances behind the crash of Flight 990. He is reported to have said that he wanted to "stop all lies about the disaster," and to put much of the blame on EgyptAir management.<ref name=guardian000508/> | ||
The NTSB and FBI sent officials to interview Taha, whose statements provided a possible motive for why Al-Batouti may have deliberately crashed the aircraft. According to Taha, hours before the flight, Al-Batouti was demoted by an EgyptAir executive who was on board the plane.<ref name=gamilalbatouti>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/16/us/egyptair-pilot-sought-revenge-by-crashing-co-worker-said.html |title=EgyptAir Pilot Sought Revenge By Crashing, Co-Worker Said |first=Matthew L. |last=Wald |date=March 16, 2002 |newspaper=] |accessdate=January 2, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/22/us/report-finds-co-pilot-at-fault-in-fatal-crash-of-egyptair-990.html |title=Report Finds Co-Pilot at Fault in Fatal Crash of EgyptAir 990 |first=Matthew L. |last=Wald |date=March 22, 2002 |newspaper=] |accessdate=March 21, 2014}}</ref> | |||
], an adviser to Egyptian President ], said, "This pilot can't know anything about the plane; the chances that he has any information are very slim."<ref name=ahram1>{{cite news |title=Rough ride for EgyptAir |url=http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2000/468/eg9.htm |newspaper=] |first=Nadia |last=Abou El-Magd |date=February 16, 2000 |accessdate=May 8, 2007}}</ref> EgyptAir officials also immediately dismissed Taha's claim.<ref name=bbc000206>{{cite news |title=EgyptAir denies pilot can explain crash |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/631789.stm |publisher=] |date=February 6, 2000 |accessdate=May 8, 2007}}</ref> American investigators confirmed key aspects of Taha's information, but decided not to anger the Egyptian government further by issuing any official statement about Al-Batouti's motive.<ref name=gamilalbatouti/><ref name=LATimes>{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2002/mar/15/news/mn-32955 |title=EgyptAir Co-Pilot Caused '99 Jet Crash, NTSB to Say |first1=Eric |last1=Malnic |first2=William C. |last2=Rempel |first3=Ricardo |last3=Alonso-Zaldivar |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=March 15, 2002 |accessdate=March 29, 2015}}</ref> EgyptAir terminated Taha's employment,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/egyptair-sacks-pilot-seeking-uk-asylum-1.29779 |title=Egyptair sacks pilot seeking UK asylum |publisher=] |date=March 1, 2000 |accessdate=March 29, 2015}}</ref> and his application for British asylum was reportedly declined,<ref name=guardian000508/> though he gave an extensive 2002 newspaper interview in ],<ref name=LATimes/> and a 2005 documentary credited him as "Exiled Captain".<ref name=Mayday/> | ], an adviser to Egyptian President ], said, "This pilot can't know anything about the plane; the chances that he has any information are very slim."<ref name=ahram1>{{cite news |title=Rough ride for EgyptAir |url=http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2000/468/eg9.htm |newspaper=] |first=Nadia |last=Abou El-Magd |date=February 16, 2000 |accessdate=May 8, 2007}}</ref> EgyptAir officials also immediately dismissed Taha's claim.<ref name=bbc000206>{{cite news |title=EgyptAir denies pilot can explain crash |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/631789.stm |publisher=] |date=February 6, 2000 |accessdate=May 8, 2007}}</ref> American investigators confirmed key aspects of Taha's information, but decided not to anger the Egyptian government further by issuing any official statement about Al-Batouti's motive.<ref name=gamilalbatouti/><ref name=LATimes>{{cite news |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2002/mar/15/news/mn-32955 |title=EgyptAir Co-Pilot Caused '99 Jet Crash, NTSB to Say |first1=Eric |last1=Malnic |first2=William C. |last2=Rempel |first3=Ricardo |last3=Alonso-Zaldivar |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=March 15, 2002 |accessdate=March 29, 2015}}</ref> EgyptAir terminated Taha's employment,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/egyptair-sacks-pilot-seeking-uk-asylum-1.29779 |title=Egyptair sacks pilot seeking UK asylum |publisher=] |date=March 1, 2000 |accessdate=March 29, 2015}}</ref> and his application for British asylum was reportedly declined,<ref name=guardian000508/> though he gave an extensive 2002 newspaper interview in ],<ref name=LATimes/> and a 2005 documentary credited him as "Exiled Captain".<ref name=Mayday/> | ||
Line 116: | Line 113: | ||
The NTSB investigation fairly quickly centered on the actions of the relief first officer, Gameel Al-Batouti, and this drew relatively minor criticism from the Egyptians.<ref>{{cite news |title=Co-pilot's family rally round 'son of the soil' |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/nov/19/egyptaircrash.usa |newspaper=] |first=Khaled |last=Dawoud |date=November 19, 1999 |accessdate=May 3, 2011}}</ref> The NTSB determined that the only way for the observed split elevator condition to occur was if the left seat pilot (the captain's position) was commanding nose up while the right seat pilot (the first officer's position) commanded nose down. As the Egyptian investigation forwarded various mechanical failure scenarios, they were each tested by the NTSB and found not to match the factual evidence. The NTSB concluded that no mechanical failure scenario either they or the Egyptians could come up with matched the evidence on the ground, and that even if mechanical failure had been experienced, the 767's design made the situation recoverable.<ref name=ntsb/> | The NTSB investigation fairly quickly centered on the actions of the relief first officer, Gameel Al-Batouti, and this drew relatively minor criticism from the Egyptians.<ref>{{cite news |title=Co-pilot's family rally round 'son of the soil' |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/nov/19/egyptaircrash.usa |newspaper=] |first=Khaled |last=Dawoud |date=November 19, 1999 |accessdate=May 3, 2011}}</ref> The NTSB determined that the only way for the observed split elevator condition to occur was if the left seat pilot (the captain's position) was commanding nose up while the right seat pilot (the first officer's position) commanded nose down. As the Egyptian investigation forwarded various mechanical failure scenarios, they were each tested by the NTSB and found not to match the factual evidence. The NTSB concluded that no mechanical failure scenario either they or the Egyptians could come up with matched the evidence on the ground, and that even if mechanical failure had been experienced, the 767's design made the situation recoverable.<ref name=ntsb/> | ||
The NTSB's final report was issued on March 21, 2002, after a two-year investigation, and concluded |
The NTSB's final report was issued on March 21, 2002, after a two-year investigation, and concluded as "not determined".<ref name=ntsb/> | ||
From the NTSB report's '''Summary''' section: | From the NTSB report's '''Summary''' section: | ||
Line 136: | Line 133: | ||
===Responses to reports=== | ===Responses to reports=== | ||
The NTSB investigation and its results drew criticism from the Egyptian government, which advanced several alternative theories about mechanical malfunction of the aircraft.<ref name=ecaa/> |
The NTSB investigation and its results drew criticism from the Egyptian government, which advanced several alternative theories about mechanical malfunction of the aircraft.<ref name=ecaa/> The theories proposed by Egyptian authorities were tested by the NTSB, and none were found to match the facts. For example, an elevator assembly hardover (in which the elevator in a fully extended position sticks because the hinge catches on the tail frame) proposed by the Egyptians was discounted because the flight recorder data showed the elevator was in a "split condition". In this state, one side of the elevator is up and the other down; on the 767, this condition is only possible through flight control input (i.e., one yoke is pushed forward, the other pulled backward).<ref name=ntsb/> | ||
767, this condition is only possible through flight control input (i.e., one yoke is pushed forward, the other pulled backward).<ref name=ntsb/> | |||
There was some evidence that one of the right elevator's power control units may have suffered a malfunction, and the Egyptian investigation mentioned this as a likely cause of the crash.<ref name=ecaa/> While noting that the damage did indeed exist, the NTSB countered that it was more likely a result of the crash rather than a pre-existing problem, as the 767 is designed to remain airworthy even with two PCUs failed.<ref name=ntsb/> | There was some evidence that one of the right elevator's power control units may have suffered a malfunction, and the Egyptian investigation mentioned this as a likely cause of the crash.<ref name=ecaa/> While noting that the damage did indeed exist, the NTSB countered that it was more likely a result of the crash rather than a pre-existing problem, as the 767 is designed to remain airworthy even with two PCUs failed.<ref name=ntsb/> | ||
Line 185: | Line 181: | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
{{col-2}} | {{col-2}} | ||
;Specific incidents | ;Specific incidents | ||
Line 204: | Line 199: | ||
The ''Mayday'' dramatization of the crash was based on ATC tapes as well as the CVR recordings. In interviews conducted for the program, the relief first officer's family members vehemently disputed the suicide and deliberate crash theories and dismissed them as biased. The program nevertheless concluded that Al-Batouti crashed the plane for personal reasons: he had been severely reprimanded by his supervisor for sexual harassment after allegedly "exposing himself to teenage girls and propositioning hotel guests",<ref>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/1388017/Co-pilot-crashed-EgyptAir-jumbo-as-act-of-revenge.html</ref> and the supervisor was in fact on board the plane when it was brought down.<ref name=Mayday/><ref name=gamilalbatouti/> | The ''Mayday'' dramatization of the crash was based on ATC tapes as well as the CVR recordings. In interviews conducted for the program, the relief first officer's family members vehemently disputed the suicide and deliberate crash theories and dismissed them as biased. The program nevertheless concluded that Al-Batouti crashed the plane for personal reasons: he had been severely reprimanded by his supervisor for sexual harassment after allegedly "exposing himself to teenage girls and propositioning hotel guests",<ref>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/1388017/Co-pilot-crashed-EgyptAir-jumbo-as-act-of-revenge.html</ref> and the supervisor was in fact on board the plane when it was brought down.<ref name=Mayday/><ref name=gamilalbatouti/> | ||
This dramatization also depicts the relief first officer forcing the plane down while the command captain attempts to pull the plane up. Despite this, upon conclusion, the program stresses the official NTSB conclusion and the fact it makes no mention of a suicide mission. Rather, it simply states that the crash was a direct result of actions made by the co-pilot for " |
This dramatization also depicts the relief first officer forcing the plane down while the command captain attempts to pull the plane up. Despite this, upon conclusion, the program stresses the official NTSB conclusion and the fact it makes no mention of a suicide mission. Rather, it simply states that the crash was a direct result of actions made by the co-pilot for reasons "not determined".<ref name=Mayday/> | ||
{{Portalbar|1990s|Aviation|Egypt|Massachusetts}} | {{Portalbar|1990s|Aviation|Egypt|Massachusetts}} | ||
Line 243: | Line 238: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Revision as of 18:12, 16 October 2018
SU-GAP, the aircraft involved in the accident, taxiing at Düsseldorf Airport in June 1992. | |
Occurrence | |
---|---|
Date | October 31, 1999 |
Summary | Cause disputed: • Not Determined Not Determined (NTSB) • Mechanical fault in elevator control system (ECAA) |
Site | Atlantic Ocean, 100 km (62 mi) south of Nantucket |
Aircraft type | Boeing 767-300ER |
Aircraft name | Tuthmosis III |
Operator | EgyptAir |
Registration | SU-GAP |
Flight origin | Los Angeles International Airport Los Angeles, California, United States |
Stopover | John F. Kennedy International Airport New York City, United States |
Destination | Cairo International Airport Cairo, Egypt |
Passengers | 203 |
Crew | 14 |
Fatalities | 217 |
Survivors | 0 |
EgyptAir Flight 990 (MS990/MSR990) was a regularly scheduled flight from Los Angeles International Airport, United States, to Cairo International Airport, Egypt, with a stop at John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York City. On October 31, 1999, the Boeing 767 operating the route crashed into the Atlantic Ocean about 60 miles (100 km) south of Nantucket Island, Massachusetts, killing all 217 passengers and crew on board. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the EgyptAir flight 990 accident is the airplane's departure from normal cruise flight and subsequent impact with the Atlantic Ocean as a result of the relief first officer's flight control inputs. The reason for the relief first officer's actions was not determined.. As the crash occurred in international waters, it was investigated by the Ministry of Civil Aviation's Egyptian Civil Aviation Agency (ECAA; Template:Lang-ar) per International Civil Aviation Organization Annex 13. As the ECAA lacked the resources of the much larger U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the Egyptian government asked the NTSB to handle the investigation. Two weeks after the crash, the NTSB proposed handing the investigation over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as the evidence suggested that a criminal act had taken place and that the crash was intentional rather than accidental. This proposal was unacceptable to the Egyptian authorities, and hence the NTSB continued to lead the investigation. Ahe NTSB concluded "not determined", while the ECAA determined that the incident was caused by mechanical failure of the aircraft's elevator control system.
The ECAA's report suggested several control failure scenarios as possible causes of the crash, focusing on a possible failure of one of the right elevator's power control units. While the NTSB's report did not determine a specific reason for the relief first officer's alleged actions, their report stated the impact was "a result of the relief first officer's flight control inputs".
Aircraft, crew, and passengers
Aircraft
Flight 990 was being flown in a Boeing 767-366ER aircraft with registration SU-GAP, named Tuthmosis III after a pharaoh from the 18th Dynasty. The aircraft, a stretched extended-range version of the standard 767, was the 282nd 767 built. It was delivered to EgyptAir as a new aircraft on September 26, 1989.
Cockpit crew
Flight 990's cockpit crew consisted of 57-year-old Captain Ahmed El-Habashi, 36-year-old First Officer Adel Anwar who was switching duty with another co-pilot so he could return home in time for his wedding, 52-year-old relief Captain Raouf Noureldin, 59-year-old relief First Officer Gameel Al-Batouti, and the airline's chief pilot for the Boeing 767, Captain Hatem Rushdy. Captain El-Habashi was a veteran pilot who had been with EgyptAir for 36 years and had accumulated approximately 14,400 total flight hours, more than 6,300 of which were on the 767. Relief First Officer Al-Batouti had close to 5,200 flight hours in the 767 and a total of roughly 12,500 hours.
Because of the 10-hour scheduled flight time, the flight required two complete flight crews, each consisting of one captain and one first officer. EgyptAir designated one crew as the "active crew" and the other as the "cruise crew", sometimes also referred to as the "relief crew". While there was no formal procedure specifying when each crew flew the aircraft, it was customary for the active crew to make the takeoff and fly the first four to five hours of the flight. The cruise crew then assumed control of the aircraft until about one to two hours before landing, at which point the active crew returned to the cockpit and assumed control of the aircraft. EgyptAir designated the captain of the active crew as the pilot-in-command or the commander of the flight.
While the cruise crew was intended to take over far into the flight, relief first officer Al-Batouti entered the cockpit and recommended that he relieve the command first officer 20 minutes after takeoff. Command first officer Anwar initially protested, but eventually relented.
Passengers
The flight was carrying 203 passengers from seven countries: Canada, Egypt, Germany, Sudan, Syria, the United States, and Zimbabwe. Of the 217 people on board, 100 were American, 89 were Egyptian (75 passengers, 14 crew), 21 were Canadian, and 7 were of other nationalities. 54 of the American passengers, many of them elderly, were booked with the tour group Grand Circle Travel for a 14-day trip to Egypt. Of the 203 passengers, 32 boarded in Los Angeles; the rest boarded in New York. Four were non-revenue EgyptAir crew members. Included in the passenger manifest were 33 Egyptian military officers returning from a training exercise; among them were two brigadier-generals, a colonel, a major, and four other air force officers. After the crash, newspapers in Cairo were prevented by censors from reporting the officers' presence on the flight.
Nationality | Passengers | Crew | Total |
---|---|---|---|
United States | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Egypt | 75 | 14 | 89 |
Canada | 21 | 0 | 21 |
Syria | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Sudan | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 203 | 14 | 217 |
The authorities at John F. Kennedy International Airport used the JFK Ramada Plaza to house relatives and friends of the victims of the crash. Due to its similar role after several aircraft crashes, the Ramada became known as the "Heartbreak Hotel".
Flight details
Incident
At 1:20 AM EST, the aircraft took off from JFK Airport's runway 22R. While relief first officer Al-Batouti was alone in the cockpit and captain El-Habashi was in the lavatory, the aircraft suddenly went into a rapid dive nose-first, resulting in weightlessness (zero-g) throughout the cabin. Despite this, the captain was able to fight the zero-g and re-enter the cockpit. The speed of the 767 was now dangerously close to the sound barrier, exceeding its design limits and beginning to weaken its airframe. The captain pulled back on his control column and applied full power to the engines, but neither action had any effect due to the aircraft's speed and the engines having been shut down. The captain then deployed the speedbrakes, which slowed the aircraft's dive, bringing it back to a safer speed. However, these abrupt maneuvers resulted in the aircraft entering a steep climb, causing g-forces to push the passengers and crew into their seats. Both engines then stopped completely, causing the aircraft to lose all electrical power and both flight recorders stopped at this point. The aircraft then fell into another steep dive and the huge mechanical stress caused the left engine to separate from the wing. The aircraft crashed into the Atlantic Ocean at 1:52 AM EST, killing all 217 people on board.
Air traffic control (ATC)
US air traffic controllers provided transatlantic flight control operations as a part of the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center (referred to in radio conversations simply as "Center" and abbreviated in the reports as "ZNY"). The airspace is divided into "areas," and "Area F" was the section that oversaw the airspace through which Flight 990 was flying. Transatlantic commercial air traffic travels via a system of routes called North Atlantic Tracks, and Flight 990 was the only aircraft at the time assigned to fly North Atlantic Track Zulu. There are also a number of military operations areas over the Atlantic, called "Warning Areas," which are also monitored by New York Center, but records show that these were inactive the night of the incident.
Interaction between ZNY and Flight 990 was completely routine. After takeoff, Flight 990 was handled by three different controllers as it climbed up in stages to its assigned cruising altitude. The aircraft, like all commercial airliners, was equipped with a Mode C transponder, which automatically reported the plane's altitude when queried by the ATC radar. At 01:44, the transponder indicated that Flight 990 had leveled off at FL330. Three minutes later, the controller requested that Flight 990 switch communications radio frequencies for better reception. A pilot on Flight 990 acknowledged on the new frequency. This was the last transmission received from the flight.
The records of the radar returns then indicate a sharp descent: (Note: these times are in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which is five hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time.)
- 06:49:53Z – FL329
- 06:50:05Z – FL315
- 06:50:17Z – FL254
- 06:50:29Z – FL183 (this was the last altitude report received by ATC)
The plane dropped 14,600 feet (4,500 m) in 36 seconds. Several subsequent "primary" returns (simple radar reflections without the encoded Mode C altitude information) were received by ATC, the last being at 06:52:05. At 06:54, the ATC controller tried notifying Flight 990 that radar contact had been lost, but received no reply. Two minutes later, the controller contacted ARINC to determine if Flight 990 had switched to an oceanic frequency too early. ARINC attempted to contact Flight 990 on SELCAL, also with no response. The controller then contacted a nearby aircraft, Lufthansa Flight 499, and asked the flight's crew to try to raise Flight 990, but they were unable to make radio contact, although they also reported they were not receiving any emergency locator transmitter signals. Air France Flight 439 was then asked to overfly the last known position of Flight 990, but that crew reported nothing out of the ordinary. Center also provided coordinates of Flight 990's last-known position to Coast Guard rescue aircraft.
Flight recorders
The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) recorded the captain excusing himself to go to the lavatory, followed thirty seconds later by the first officer saying in Egyptian Arabic "Tawkalt ala Allah," which translates to "I rely on God." A minute later, the autopilot was disengaged, immediately followed by the first officer again saying, "I rely on God." Three seconds later, the throttles for both engines were reduced to idle, and both elevators were moved three degrees nose down. The first officer repeated "I rely on God" seven more times before the captain suddenly asked repeatedly, "What's happening, what's happening?" The flight data recorder reflected that the elevators then moved into a split condition, with the left elevator up and the right elevator down, a condition which is expected to result when the two control columns are subjected to at least 50 pounds (23 kg) of opposing force. At this point, both engines were shut down by moving the start levers from run to cutoff. The captain asked, "What is this? What is this? Did you shut the engines?" The captain is then recorded as saying "get away in the engines" (this is the literal translation that appears in the NTSB transcript), followed by "shut the engines". The first officer replies "It's shut". The final recorded words are the captain repeatedly stating, "Pull with me" but the FDR data indicated that the elevator surfaces remained in a split condition (with the left surface commanding nose up and the right surface commanding nose down) until the FDR and CVR stopped recording. There were no other aircraft in the area. There was no indication that an explosion occurred on board. The engines operated normally for the entire flight until they were shut down. From the presence of a western debris field about 1,200 feet (370 m) from the eastern debris field, the NTSB concluded that the left engine and some small pieces of wreckage separated from the aircraft before water impact.
Search and rescue operations
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "EgyptAir Flight 990" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The aircraft crashed in international waters, so the Egyptian government had the right to initiate its own search and rescue and investigation. Because the government did not have the resources to salvage the aircraft, the Egyptian government requested that the United States lead the investigation. The Egyptian government signed a letter formally ceding responsibility of investigating the accident to the United States.
Search and rescue operations were launched within minutes of the loss of radar contact, with the bulk of the operation being conducted by the United States Coast Guard. At 03:00 EST, an HU-25 Falcon jet took off from Air Station Cape Cod, becoming the first rescue party to reach the last known position of the plane. All U.S. Coast Guard cutters in the area were immediately diverted to search for the aircraft, and an urgent marine information broadcast was issued, requesting mariners in the area to keep a lookout for the downed aircraft.
At sunrise, the United States Merchant Marine Academy training vessel T/V Kings Pointer found an oil sheen and some small pieces of debris. Rescue efforts continued by air and by sea, with a group of U.S. Coast Guard cutters covering 10,000 square miles (26,000 km) on October 31 with the hope of locating survivors, but no bodies were recovered from the debris field. Eventually most passengers were identified by DNA from fractured remains recovered from the debris field and the ocean floor. Atlantic Strike Team members brought two truckloads of equipment from Fort Dix, New Jersey, to Newport, Rhode Island, to set up an incident command post. Officials from the United States Navy and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) were dispatched to join the command. The search and rescue operation was suspended on November 1, 1999, with the rescue vessels and aircraft moving instead to recovery operations.
The U.S. Navy rescue and salvage ship USS Grapple (ARS-53), the U.S. Navy fleet ocean tug USNS Mohawk (T-ATF-170), and the NOAA survey ship NOAAS Whiting (S 329) arrived to take over salvage efforts, including recovery of the bulk of the wreckage from the seabed. The flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder were recovered within days by the U.S. Navy's Deep Drone III submersible. In total, a C-130 Hercules, an H-60 helicopter, the HU-25 Falcon, and the U.S. Coast Guard cutters USCGC Monomoy (WPB-1326), USCGC Spencer (WMEC-905), USCGC Reliance (WMEC-615), USCGC Bainbridge Island (WPB-1343), USCGC Juniper (WLB-201), USCGC Point Highland (WPB-82333), USCGC Chinook (WPB-87308), and USCGC Hammerhead, along with their supporting helicopters, participated in the search.
A second salvage effort was made in March 2000 that recovered the aircraft's second engine and some of the cockpit controls.
Investigations
Under the International Civil Aviation Organization treaty, the investigation of an aircraft crash in international waters is under the jurisdiction of the country of registry of the aircraft. At the request of the Egyptian government, the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) took the lead in this investigation, with the Egyptian Civil Aviation Authority (ECAA) participating. The investigation was supported by the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the United States Coast Guard, the US Department of Defense, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, EgyptAir, and Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Engines.
Two weeks after the crash, the NTSB proposed declaring the crash a criminal event and handing the investigation over to the FBI. Egyptian government officials protested, and Omar Suleiman, head of Egyptian intelligence, traveled to Washington to join the investigation.
Defection of Hamdi Hanafi Taha
In February 2000, EgyptAir 767 captain Hamdi Hanafi Taha sought political asylum in London after landing his aircraft there. In his statement to British authorities, he claimed to have knowledge of the circumstances behind the crash of Flight 990. He is reported to have said that he wanted to "stop all lies about the disaster," and to put much of the blame on EgyptAir management.
Osama El-Baz, an adviser to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, said, "This pilot can't know anything about the plane; the chances that he has any information are very slim." EgyptAir officials also immediately dismissed Taha's claim. American investigators confirmed key aspects of Taha's information, but decided not to anger the Egyptian government further by issuing any official statement about Al-Batouti's motive. EgyptAir terminated Taha's employment, and his application for British asylum was reportedly declined, though he gave an extensive 2002 newspaper interview in London, and a 2005 documentary credited him as "Exiled Captain".
NTSB investigation and conclusion
The NTSB investigation fairly quickly centered on the actions of the relief first officer, Gameel Al-Batouti, and this drew relatively minor criticism from the Egyptians. The NTSB determined that the only way for the observed split elevator condition to occur was if the left seat pilot (the captain's position) was commanding nose up while the right seat pilot (the first officer's position) commanded nose down. As the Egyptian investigation forwarded various mechanical failure scenarios, they were each tested by the NTSB and found not to match the factual evidence. The NTSB concluded that no mechanical failure scenario either they or the Egyptians could come up with matched the evidence on the ground, and that even if mechanical failure had been experienced, the 767's design made the situation recoverable.
The NTSB's final report was issued on March 21, 2002, after a two-year investigation, and concluded as "not determined".
From the NTSB report's Summary section:
1. The accident airplane's nose-down movements did not result from a failure in the elevator control system or any other airplane failure.
2. The accident airplane's movements during the initial part of the accident sequence were the result of the relief first officer's manipulation of the controls.
3. The accident airplane's movements after the command captain returned to the cockpit were the result of both pilots' inputs, including opposing elevator inputs where the relief first officer continued to command nose-down and the captain commanded nose-up elevator movements.
From the NTSB report's Probable Cause section:
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the EgyptAir flight 990 accident is the airplane's departure from normal cruise flight and subsequent impact with the Atlantic Ocean as a result of the relief first officer's flight control inputs. The reason for the relief first officer's actions was not determined.
ECAA investigation and conclusion
After formally ceding responsibility for the investigation of the accident to the NTSB, the Egyptian authorities became increasingly unhappy with the direction the investigation was heading and launched their own investigation in the weeks following the accident. The ECAA report concluded that "the Relief First Officer did not deliberately dive the airplane into the ocean" and that mechanical failure was "a plausible and likely cause of the accident".
William Langewiesche, an aviation journalist, said: "n the case of the Egyptians, they were following a completely different line of thinking. It seemed to me that they knew very well that their man, Batouti, had done this. They were pursuing a political agenda that was driven by the need to answer to their higher-ups in a very pyramidal, autocratic political structure. The word had been passed down from on high, probably from Mubarak himself, that there was no way that Batouti, the co-pilot, could have done this. For the accident investigators in Egypt, the game then became not pursuing the truth but backing the official line."
Responses to reports
The NTSB investigation and its results drew criticism from the Egyptian government, which advanced several alternative theories about mechanical malfunction of the aircraft. The theories proposed by Egyptian authorities were tested by the NTSB, and none were found to match the facts. For example, an elevator assembly hardover (in which the elevator in a fully extended position sticks because the hinge catches on the tail frame) proposed by the Egyptians was discounted because the flight recorder data showed the elevator was in a "split condition". In this state, one side of the elevator is up and the other down; on the 767, this condition is only possible through flight control input (i.e., one yoke is pushed forward, the other pulled backward).
There was some evidence that one of the right elevator's power control units may have suffered a malfunction, and the Egyptian investigation mentioned this as a likely cause of the crash. While noting that the damage did indeed exist, the NTSB countered that it was more likely a result of the crash rather than a pre-existing problem, as the 767 is designed to remain airworthy even with two PCUs failed.
In response to the ECAA's claim of NTSB unprofessionalism, former NTSB director of aviation safety Bernard Loeb stated:
What was unprofessional was the insistence by the Egyptians, in the face of irrefutable evidence, to anyone who knows anything about investigating airplane accidents and who knows anything about aerodynamics and airplanes, was the fact that this airplane was intentionally flown into the ocean. No scenario that the Egyptians came up with, or that we came up with, in which there were some sort of mechanical failure in the elevator control system, would either match the flight profile or was a situation in which the airplane was not recoverable.
Another discredited theory, posited by literature professor Elaine Scarry, proposed that Flight 990 was subjected to electromagnetic interference by military aircraft. In a critique of Scarry's writing, Didier de Fontaine, professor emeritus of materials science at UC Berkeley, discussed the lack of scientific basis for Scarry's hypothesis and stated that she had engaged in "voodoo science" disproved by both NASA and the NTSB.
Media coverage
While the official investigation was proceeding, speculation about the crash ran rampant in both Western and Egyptian media.
Western media speculation
Long before the NTSB issued its final report, Western media began to speculate about the meaning of the recorded cockpit conversations and about possible motives – including suicide and terrorism – behind Al-Batouti's actions on the flight. The speculation, in part, was based on leaks from an unnamed federal law enforcement official that the crew member in the co-pilot's seat was recorded as saying, "I made my decision now. I put my faith in God's hands."
During a press conference held on November 19, 1999, NTSB chairman Jim Hall denounced such speculation and said that it had "done a disservice to the long-standing friendship between the people of the United States of America and Egypt."
On November 20, 1999, the Associated Press quoted senior American officials as saying that the quotation was not in fact on the recording. It is believed that the speculation arose from a mistranslation of an Egyptian Arabic phrase (Tawkalt ala Allah) meaning "I rely on God."
London's Sunday Times, quoting unnamed sources, speculated that the relief first officer had been "traumatised by war," and was depressed because many members of his fighter squadron in the 1973 war had been killed.
The unprecedented presence of 33 members of the Egyptian General Staff on the flight (contrary to standard operating procedure) fed a number of conspiracy theories. There were those who opined that it was an action (and potentially a conspiracy) of Muslim extremists against Egypt. Others countered that Mossad had targeted them.
Egyptian media reaction and speculation
The Egyptian media reacted with outrage to the speculations in the Western press. The state-owned Al Ahram Al Misri called Al-Batouti a "martyr," and the Islamist Al Shaab covered the story under a headline that stated, "America's goal is to hide the truth by blaming the EgyptAir pilot."
At least two Egyptian newspapers, Al Gomhuria and Al-Musawar, offered theories that the aircraft was accidentally shot down by the US. Other theories were advanced by the Egyptian press as well, including the Islamist Al Shaab, which speculated that a Mossad/CIA conspiracy was to blame (since, supposedly, EgyptAir and El Al crews stayed at the same hotel in New York). Al Shaab also accused US officials of secretly recovering the FDR, reprogramming it, and throwing it back into the water to be publicly recovered.
Unifying all the Egyptian press was a stridently held belief that "it is inconceivable that a pilot would kill himself by crashing a jet with 217 people aboard. 'It is not possible that anyone who would commit suicide would also kill so many innocent people alongside him,' said Ehab William, a surgeon at Cairo's Anglo-American Hospital."
The Egyptian media also reacted against Western speculation of terrorist connections. The Cairo Times reported, "The deceased pilot's nephew has lashed out in particular against speculation that his uncle could have been a religious extremist. 'He loved the United States,' the nephew said. 'If you wanted to go shopping in New York, he was the man to speak to, because he knew all the stores.'"
Reaction of the Egyptian public
William Langewiesche, an author, journalist and aviator, said that in Cairo he encountered three groups of people. He said that the ordinary Cairenes believed that there was an American conspiracy to attack EgyptAir 990 and that the Americans were covering up the fact. He added that a small group of Cairenes, mostly consisting of "intelligentsia", "knew perfectly well that Batouti, the co-pilot, had pushed that airplane into the water, and that the Egyptian government was stonewalling and was engaged in what they saw as a typical exercise in Egyptian governing." Langewiesche said that "people involved directly in the investigation" had "presented a uniform party line, a uniform face with very few cracks. They stonewalled me, and that in itself was very interesting." Langewiesche argued that "in the stonewalling they were revealing themselves" and that if they truly believed Batouti was innocent, they would have invited Langewiesche to see proof of this theory.
Aftermath
After the crash, the airline changed the flight number for the JFK to Cairo route from MS990 to MS986, and discontinued the service to Los Angeles. Flight 986 is operated using a Boeing 777-300ER.
See also
|
In popular culture
Al Jazeera, an Arabic-language channel, produced a documentary by Yosri Fouda about the flight that was broadcast in March 2000. The documentary looked at the preliminary NTSB conclusion and speculations surrounding it. In the documentary, the NTSB data were used with a flight simulator of the same aircraft model to try to reconstruct the circumstances of the crash, but the simulator failed three times to replicate the NTSB theory for plunging a fully functioning 767 from 33,000 ft (10,000 m) to 19,000 ft (5,800 m) in 37 seconds. However, a 2001 journalist describes how he successfully reproduced the incident in a Boeing flight simulator.
The events of Flight 990 were featured in "Death and Denial", a Season 3 (2005) episode of the Canadian TV series Mayday (called Air Emergency and Air Disasters in the U.S. and Air Crash Investigation in the UK and elsewhere around the world). The episode was broadcast with the title "EgyptAir 990" in the United Kingdom, Australia and Asia.
The Mayday dramatization of the crash was based on ATC tapes as well as the CVR recordings. In interviews conducted for the program, the relief first officer's family members vehemently disputed the suicide and deliberate crash theories and dismissed them as biased. The program nevertheless concluded that Al-Batouti crashed the plane for personal reasons: he had been severely reprimanded by his supervisor for sexual harassment after allegedly "exposing himself to teenage girls and propositioning hotel guests", and the supervisor was in fact on board the plane when it was brought down.
This dramatization also depicts the relief first officer forcing the plane down while the command captain attempts to pull the plane up. Despite this, upon conclusion, the program stresses the official NTSB conclusion and the fact it makes no mention of a suicide mission. Rather, it simply states that the crash was a direct result of actions made by the co-pilot for reasons "not determined".
Portals:References
- ^ "Aircraft Accident Brief: EgyptAir Flight 990" (PDF). NTSB. March 2002. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Report of Investigation of Accident: EgyptAir 990" (PDF). ECAA. June 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 22, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - "Statement of Jim Hall, Chairman". NTSB. August 11, 2000. Retrieved August 4, 2015.
- ^ Mayday, Season 3, Episode 8: "EgyptAir 990 (Death and Denial)". November 2, 2005.
- Swanson, Steven (November 1, 1999). "At JFK, Another Grim Routine in 'Heartbreak Hotel'". Chicago Tribune.
- "Passenger list for EgyptAir Flight 990". St. Petersburg Times. November 2, 1999. Retrieved March 24, 2008.
- Ellison, Michael (November 2, 1999). "Search for air crash survivors abandoned". The Guardian. Retrieved April 28, 2007.
- "Hotel Near JFK Airport is Familiar With Airline Tragedy". CNN. 17 November 2001. Archived from the original on March 8, 2014.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - Adamson, April (September 4, 1998). "229 Victims Knew Jet Was in Trouble; Airport Inn Becomes Heartbreak Hotel Again". Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved March 9, 2014.
- Ranter, Harro. "ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 767-366ER SU-GAP Nantucket Island, MA, USA". aviation-safety.net. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
- ^ Langewiesche, William (November 2001). "The Crash of EgyptAir 990". The Atlantic Monthly. 228 (4). Retrieved July 3, 2010.
- "The final, fatal flight of EgyptAir 990". Commandant's Bulletin. United States Coast Guard. January 2000. Retrieved May 1, 2007.
- ^ Borger, Julian; Dawoud, Khaled (May 8, 2000). "Wings and a Prayer". The Guardian. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
- Abou El-Magd, Nadia (February 16, 2000). "Rough ride for EgyptAir". Al-Ahram Weekly. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
- "EgyptAir denies pilot can explain crash". BBC News. February 6, 2000. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
gamilalbatouti
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Malnic, Eric; Rempel, William C.; Alonso-Zaldivar, Ricardo (March 15, 2002). "EgyptAir Co-Pilot Caused '99 Jet Crash, NTSB to Say". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
- "Egyptair sacks pilot seeking UK asylum". Independent Online. March 1, 2000. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
- Dawoud, Khaled (November 19, 1999). "Co-pilot's family rally round 'son of the soil'". The Guardian. Retrieved May 3, 2011.
- ^ Langewiesche, William (November 15, 2001). "Culture Crash". Atlantic Unbound (Interview). Interviewed by Katie Bacon. Retrieved September 19, 2012.
- Scarry, Elaine (October 5, 2000). "The Fall of EgyptAir 990". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved June 11, 2008.
- de Fontaine, Didier (February 2001). "Concerning the Fall of TWA 800, Swissair 111 and EgyptAir 990: The Unfriendly Skies Scenario". University of California, Berkeley.
- Lathem, Niles (November 18, 1999). "FBI Profilers Dig into Co-Pilot's Past". The New York Post. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
- ^ "Suicide speculation under fire". Cairo Times. November 1999. Archived from the original on May 12, 2007. Retrieved April 29, 2007.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - "Batouty clan stands united". Cairo Times. November 1999. Archived from the original on May 12, 2007. Retrieved April 29, 2007.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - Piotrowski, William K. (Spring 2000). "What's in a Name?: The Crash of EgyptAir 990". Religion in the News. 3 (1). Trinity College. Retrieved January 15, 2011.
- "Egyptair Flight MS986 / MSR986". planefinderdata. Retrieved May 20, 2018.
- El-Nawawy, Mohammed; Iskander, Adel (2003). Al-Jazeera: The Story of the Network that is Rattling Governments and Redefining Modern Journalism. Basic Books. Retrieved March 28, 2015.
- "Death and Denial". Mayday. Season 3. Episode 8. 2005. Discovery Channel Canada / National Geographic Channel.
- https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/1388017/Co-pilot-crashed-EgyptAir-jumbo-as-act-of-revenge.html
External links
External image | |
---|---|
Pre-accident photos of SU-GAP from Airliners.net |
- NTSB Final Report
- ECAA Final Report
- ATC transmission transcript
- Cockpit Voice Recorder transcript and accident summary
- Flight data recorder data summary
- NTSB debris image links Structural debris, structural debris, engine debris
- Media links:
- "Egyptair crash" – The Guardian – Archive of various news stories
- Egypt's ambassador praises work on Flight 990 probe – CNN
- 217 feared dead in EgyptAir crash – CNN
- Crash of Flight 990 – CBS News
- Mubarak receives calls of condolences – Egyptian State Information Service
- Other links:
This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the National Transportation Safety Board.
40°20′51″N 69°45′24″W / 40.34750°N 69.75667°W / 40.34750; -69.75667
Categories:- 1999 in Egypt
- 1999 in Massachusetts
- Accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 767
- Airliner accidents and incidents in Massachusetts
- Aviation accidents and incidents in 1999
- Aviation accident investigations with disputed causes
- Conspiracy theories involving aviation incidents
- Egypt–United States relations
- EgyptAir accidents and incidents
- Marine salvage operations
- Mass murder in 1999
- Murder–suicides in the United States
- Nantucket, Massachusetts
- October 1999 events