| Revision as of 21:58, 8 November 2006 editPuddleman (talk | contribs)92 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 23:45, 8 November 2006 edit undo82.81.16.213 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == November 8, 2006 Retaliation/shelling == | == November 8, 2006 Retaliation/shelling == | ||
| Changed this from the former to the latter. No mention in the article of this being Israeli retaliation, and the point of the article is not the context in which it happened but the event itself. Several shells fell, killing eighteen. "Retaliation" sounds POV. ] 21:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | Changed this from the former to the latter. No mention in the article of this being Israeli retaliation, and the point of the article is not the context in which it happened but the event itself. Several shells fell, killing eighteen. "Retaliation" sounds POV. ] 21:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==don't belive to the arabs propoganda machine== | |||
| they know very well how to pose in front of a camera and making themselves "suffering" but,to host terrorists,who know they are "operating" from "civilian" concentrations,knowing that the Israeli Army is the most humane Army in the world,and other armies (like Russian,French,British,and American) don't care the "world response". | |||
| so the terrorists keep firing bombs '''intentionally''' towards Israeli towns (like Sderot) but Israel,of course,cannot retaliate even with the smallest force,because if they do,it will be a "massecre" right? | |||
| I wonder,if Mexico would have done the same thing to America even once,not in the course of 6 years,what the unites states would have done... | |||
| lets face it,if other Army "accidently" bombs a mosque,or a wedding,no one cares... | |||
| but if '''israel''' will do a 1% of that,the whole world will awake suddenley | |||
| (this is said not only for this event but also in general) | |||
| hypocracy/Antisemitism? | |||
Revision as of 23:45, 8 November 2006
November 8, 2006 Retaliation/shelling
Changed this from the former to the latter. No mention in the article of this being Israeli retaliation, and the point of the article is not the context in which it happened but the event itself. Several shells fell, killing eighteen. "Retaliation" sounds POV. Puddleman 21:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
don't belive to the arabs propoganda machine
they know very well how to pose in front of a camera and making themselves "suffering" but,to host terrorists,who know they are "operating" from "civilian" concentrations,knowing that the Israeli Army is the most humane Army in the world,and other armies (like Russian,French,British,and American) don't care the "world response". so the terrorists keep firing bombs intentionally towards Israeli towns (like Sderot) but Israel,of course,cannot retaliate even with the smallest force,because if they do,it will be a "massecre" right?
I wonder,if Mexico would have done the same thing to America even once,not in the course of 6 years,what the unites states would have done...
lets face it,if other Army "accidently" bombs a mosque,or a wedding,no one cares... but if israel will do a 1% of that,the whole world will awake suddenley (this is said not only for this event but also in general)
hypocracy/Antisemitism?