| Revision as of 22:06, 3 November 2018 editYellow Diamond (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,247 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:29, 4 November 2018 edit undoJohnBlackburne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,799 edits →Hàn-jī: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| * '''redirect''' to ] which covers the use of Chinese for Hokkien much more fully with sources.--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 13:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC) | * '''redirect''' to ] which covers the use of Chinese for Hokkien much more fully with sources.--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 13:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ** Sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if it would be better to redirect there, or maybe redirect to ], seeing as that's what Han-ji means. Should the Hokkien for Chinese characters redirect to Hokkien writing, or Chinese characters? I'm not sure we need it at all. --] <font color="yellow">Δ</font>] 22:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC) | ** Sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if it would be better to redirect there, or maybe redirect to ], seeing as that's what Han-ji means. Should the Hokkien for Chinese characters redirect to Hokkien writing, or Chinese characters? I'm not sure we need it at all. --] <font color="yellow">Δ</font>] 22:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ***I see where you are coming from on this. I agree, Hàn-jī just means Chinese characters. But it’s a far less likely search term than e.g. ], so there is much less need for it. But as an article that’s existed a couple of years there may be links to it from elsewhere, it may be cached in e.g. search engines or browser caches. Anyone accessing it is likely looking for the content that’s there now, and the best place to send them is the article that covers the topic properly, which is ].--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 11:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:29, 4 November 2018
Hàn-jī
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Hàn-jī (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not actually a distinct writing system, it's just Chinese characters (with some unique ones, but it's still not as distinct as, say, Chu Nom. Not notable, google search returned nothing, couldn't find an indication of topic's notability from a brief search of scholarly database. Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 04:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 07:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- redirect to Written Hokkien which covers the use of Chinese for Hokkien much more fully with sources.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 13:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if it would be better to redirect there, or maybe redirect to Chinese characters, seeing as that's what Han-ji means. Should the Hokkien for Chinese characters redirect to Hokkien writing, or Chinese characters? I'm not sure we need it at all. --Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 22:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- I see where you are coming from on this. I agree, Hàn-jī just means Chinese characters. But it’s a far less likely search term than e.g. Hanzi, so there is much less need for it. But as an article that’s existed a couple of years there may be links to it from elsewhere, it may be cached in e.g. search engines or browser caches. Anyone accessing it is likely looking for the content that’s there now, and the best place to send them is the article that covers the topic properly, which is Written Hokkien.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 11:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if it would be better to redirect there, or maybe redirect to Chinese characters, seeing as that's what Han-ji means. Should the Hokkien for Chinese characters redirect to Hokkien writing, or Chinese characters? I'm not sure we need it at all. --Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 22:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)