Revision as of 22:02, 9 November 2006 editMattisse (talk | contribs)78,542 edits Re:Selena Fox & Phyllis Curott← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:09, 9 November 2006 edit undo999~enwiki (talk | contribs)5,157 edits →Re:Selena Fox & Phyllis CurottNext edit → | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
In the case of ] I copied that edit summary from one of the edit summaries of ] because she is thought to be an expert. But maybe I was wrong in doing so, as looking through ] right now, I don't see it. So maybe she is wrong. In any case, the article has been reverted by ] and the link is restored. I will check into it more, but I apologize if I was wrong. In the case of ] there are no reference citations per ] and ]. ] is an example of a referenced article. There are better examples and I will find more if you want. In any case, that article also has been reverted by ] and what was there before my edit is now restored. Hope this helps ]] 22:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | In the case of ] I copied that edit summary from one of the edit summaries of ] because she is thought to be an expert. But maybe I was wrong in doing so, as looking through ] right now, I don't see it. So maybe she is wrong. In any case, the article has been reverted by ] and the link is restored. I will check into it more, but I apologize if I was wrong. In the case of ] there are no reference citations per ] and ]. ] is an example of a referenced article. There are better examples and I will find more if you want. In any case, that article also has been reverted by ] and what was there before my edit is now restored. Hope this helps ]] 22:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Mattisse, ] was removing personal external links that were NOT RELATED to the article in question. E.G. links to a site containing amateur original research about a topic, not sites BELONGING to the subject of the article. Your "copycat" campaign seems to be part of your ongoing harassment of certain users such as ], ] and ]. But don't worry, you will have a chance to defend your behaviour soon. -] (]) 22:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:09, 9 November 2006
Talk page messages from November 1, 2005 to January 15, 2006 can be found at User talk:AdelaMae/Archive1.
Talk page messages from January 15, 2006 to October 9, 2006 can be found at User talk:AdelaMae/Archive2.
Olympianism
"If there are some insights particular to the Olympian strain of Hellenic polytheism that need to be incorporated into Misplaced Pages's account of Hellenic polytheism, please add them to the main article so that people will be able to find them."
I'll have to get back to you on this, I'm currently working on an article. Yes Olympianism is more or less what people mean by Hellenic Polytheism/Paganism Hellenismos etc But also includes the Roman manifestation, which Hellenismos excludes. It is also deity centric rather than culturally specific.
To be precise Olympianism is what people mean when they refer to Greco-Roman or Classical Paganism.
Therefore I would say a completly new entry is needed.
Regards Meic
November Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Re:Selena Fox & Phyllis Curott
In the case of Selena Fox I copied that edit summary from one of the edit summaries of User:Ekajati because she is thought to be an expert. But maybe I was wrong in doing so, as looking through WP:EL right now, I don't see it. So maybe she is wrong. In any case, the article has been reverted by User:Hanuman Das and the link is restored. I will check into it more, but I apologize if I was wrong. In the case of Phyllis Curott there are no reference citations per WP:V and WP:CITE. Ralph Bass is an example of a referenced article. There are better examples and I will find more if you want. In any case, that article also has been reverted by User:Hanuman Das and what was there before my edit is now restored. Hope this helps Mattisse(talk) 22:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Mattisse, Ekajati was removing personal external links that were NOT RELATED to the article in question. E.G. links to a site containing amateur original research about a topic, not sites BELONGING to the subject of the article. Your "copycat" campaign seems to be part of your ongoing harassment of certain users such as Rosencomet, Hanuman Das and Ekajati. But don't worry, you will have a chance to defend your behaviour soon. -999 (Talk) 22:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)