| Revision as of 12:04, 10 November 2006 edit212.219.94.30 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:04, 10 November 2006 edit undo212.219.94.30 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| *By taking the policies on ] seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{tl|fact}}-tagging '''all''' unsourced claims ] 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | *By taking the policies on ] seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{tl|fact}}-tagging '''all''' unsourced claims ] 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. ] 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | *As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. ] 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| hes a wanker | hes a wanker like kenneth walker | ||
Revision as of 12:04, 10 November 2006
- By taking the policies on WP:BLP seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{fact}}-tagging all unsourced claims HJ 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. St.isaac 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
hes a wanker like kenneth walker