Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rioter 1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:34, 16 November 2018 editDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Oversighters, Administrators263,753 edits It's basic policy not to restore unsourced material: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 05:14, 22 November 2018 edit undoJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits Notice of discretionary sanctions: new sectionNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:


Please read all of ], but the key bit in this case is "All content must be verifiable. The '''burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material''', and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports<ref>A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if that information is ] present in the source, so that using this source to support this material is not a violation of ]." Thanks. If you wish you can copy it to the talk page to see if others can source it, but it shouldn't be restored unsourced. ] tells you how to cite sources, ] along with VERIFY tells you what types of sources we use. ] ] 12:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC) Please read all of ], but the key bit in this case is "All content must be verifiable. The '''burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material''', and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports<ref>A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if that information is ] present in the source, so that using this source to support this material is not a violation of ]." Thanks. If you wish you can copy it to the talk page to see if others can source it, but it shouldn't be restored unsourced. ] tells you how to cite sources, ] along with VERIFY tells you what types of sources we use. ] ] 12:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

== Notice of discretionary sanctions ==

{{subst;ds/alert|blp}}

Please actually do read ], by the way. The first sentence says quite clearly {{tq|Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to ''any'' Misplaced Pages page.}} ] (]) 05:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:14, 22 November 2018

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Misplaced Pages:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Misplaced Pages:

The Misplaced Pages tutorial is a good place to start learning about Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 13:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello

I happened to look at your contribution history. I think you are not reading the context correctly at Basharat Peer, 'part' is indeed correct in the given context. Please have patience and read it one more time. Also Your addition at Ghar Wapsi, though correct, isn't a terrible improvement, the article is anyway in the dumps. You can probably work on improving the article as a whole, feel free to use non-English source if that is what you get. It is not an old term, there may not be many English sources, look at other Indian language sources. I am sure other editors will not have a problem if you develop the article as a whole instead of adding just half a phrase. Just my opinion. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 15:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm RegentsPark. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Anti-Hindu sentiment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 20:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

It's basic policy not to restore unsourced material

Please read all of WP:VERIFY, but the key bit in this case is "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports<ref>A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if that information is directly present in the source, so that using this source to support this material is not a violation of Misplaced Pages:No original research." Thanks. If you wish you can copy it to the talk page to see if others can source it, but it shouldn't be restored unsourced. Help:Referencing for beginners tells you how to cite sources, WP:RS along with VERIFY tells you what types of sources we use. Doug Weller talk 12:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions

Template:Subst;ds/alert

Please actually do read WP:BLP, by the way. The first sentence says quite clearly Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Misplaced Pages page. Jytdog (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)