Misplaced Pages

:Suspected copyright violations: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:28, 11 November 2006 editReyBrujo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,722 edits Angel y Khriz already tagged as speedy copyvio. User:DjCante already warned. List not empty.← Previous edit Revision as of 19:28, 11 November 2006 edit undoReyBrujo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,722 edits Removing Chrisopher guerin, already deleted. List not empty.Next edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
*: The page was from ]. I'm guessing this is a false positive, though the URL given is down at this moment, so I can't confirm. --] 17:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC) *: The page was from ]. I'm guessing this is a false positive, though the URL given is down at this moment, so I can't confirm. --] 17:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
*::Indeed. I considered that too, but since mobyell.com is not being listed as a ], I thought I would keep it listed here until the site is up again. I believe it is a relatively new site, as Yahoo has no cached version of their pages and Netcraft has no statistics about the site. Since this is a split, I guess we can treat this as a false positive, maybe leaving a note in the article for future reference in case mobyell.com ever comes back. -- ] 17:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC) *::Indeed. I considered that too, but since mobyell.com is not being listed as a ], I thought I would keep it listed here until the site is up again. I believe it is a relatively new site, as Yahoo has no cached version of their pages and Netcraft has no statistics about the site. Since this is a split, I guess we can treat this as a false positive, maybe leaving a note in the article for future reference in case mobyell.com ever comes back. -- ] 17:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
* ] -- . Reported at 18:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
*: Tagged as speedy copyvio. {{user|Shuaib123}} informed. -- ] 18:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
* ] -- . Reported at 18:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC) * ] -- . Reported at 18:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
*: Tagged as speedy copyvio. {{user|Shuaib123}} informed. -- ] 18:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC) *: Tagged as speedy copyvio. {{user|Shuaib123}} informed. -- ] 18:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:28, 11 November 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Possible copyvios as detected by Wherebot. You can remove them when you are done.

Copyright permission appears to be pending... see talk --W.marsh 18:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I added a comment. It is basically a "But I wrote that, I give permission to use it" situation. I don't think these editors are either pointing out what GFDL means to the author, or the author does not comprehend that. That is why I usually use "extreme examples" ("So, I will pick your text, change words to damage your product reputation, and post it in my site without you being able to claim I am breaking your copyright") with people to make them understand it is better to just write an article from scratch than requesting permission. -- ReyBrujo 21:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)