| Revision as of 16:21, 5 December 2018 edit2600:1:c6f3:509d:41db:8b95:1613:f680 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:22, 5 December 2018 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 2600:1:C6F3:509D:41DB:8B95:1613:F680 - ""Next edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| ===wiki editor making up conclusions and connecting dots== | ===wiki editor making up conclusions and connecting dots== | ||
| In 2014 you accused me of making up conclusions by connecting dots. Im so smart, i used an ALREADY EXISTING reference to prove my point. I have left a message regarding this on the "old fashioned" talk page where you originally said i was wrong. I would appreciate you reviewing the newfound information and if nothing else atleast an apology and admission that i am infact the greatest cocktail historian to ever live. Seeing as i answered two of the timeless mysteries in the cocktail field that have been a mystery for over 150 years....."where does the cocktail come from"? Where does the old fashion come from?". and I figured it out.... so yeah... theres that. | In 2014 you accused me of making up conclusions by connecting dots. Im so smart, i used an ALREADY EXISTING reference to prove my point. I have left a message regarding this on the "old fashioned" talk page where you originally said i was wrong. I would appreciate you reviewing the newfound information and if nothing else atleast an apology and admission that i am infact the greatest cocktail historian to ever live. Seeing as i answered two of the timeless mysteries in the cocktail field that have been a mystery for over 150 years....."where does the cocktail come from"? Where does the old fashion come from?". and I figured it out.... so yeah... theres that. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
Revision as of 16:22, 5 December 2018
The ArbCom as currently constructed and staffed has amply demonstrated that not only is it incapable of accomplishing the sole task for which it was established (To provide resolution to disputes that the community has been unable to resolve), it has become the locus from which disruption emanates. Vote NO on every candidate to prevent further validation of this farce.
HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!
Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!
The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.
The most ethical show in the big top!
| This is TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive
Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
=wiki editor making up conclusions and connecting dots
In 2014 you accused me of making up conclusions by connecting dots. Im so smart, i used an ALREADY EXISTING reference to prove my point. I have left a message regarding this on the "old fashioned" talk page where you originally said i was wrong. I would appreciate you reviewing the newfound information and if nothing else atleast an apology and admission that i am infact the greatest cocktail historian to ever live. Seeing as i answered two of the timeless mysteries in the cocktail field that have been a mystery for over 150 years....."where does the cocktail come from"? Where does the old fashion come from?". and I figured it out.... so yeah... theres that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:C6F3:509D:41DB:8B95:1613:F680 (talk) 16:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)