Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:36, 12 November 2006

3rr rule Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:3RR. You be reported if you continue.

The Three-revert rule (or 3RR) is an official policy which applies to all Wikipedians. 3RR violations are reported here. The policy states that an editor must not perform more than three reversions, in whole or in part, on a single Misplaced Pages article within a 24 hour period. This does not imply that reverting three times or fewer is acceptable. Users may be blocked for edit warring or disruption even if they do not revert more than three times per day. By 72.91.4.91 21:36, 25 October 2006 72.91.4.91

NPA

Your response to my citation request on Brahma Kumaris Talk ] request contained a personal attack,

"Sadly, this underline how little due care and attention you are giving any given references that oppose your organization's current PR and, perhaps, how unaware or misled you have been of your own organization's history."

Your response violates the NPA policy in regards of "negative personal comments" and "using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views". You have also found out and started quoting my full name instead of my username ] without my consent. I have warned you about both these types of attacks before but since you persist I am issuing you with the first NPA warning:

Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Regards Bksimonb 15:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

BKWSU

Archiving is a good idea. However, I'd suggest mentioning in your edit summaries that that is what you are doing. Otherwise, it looks like simple blanking. --Woohookitty 11:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

If in mediation one or more party refuses to participate, mediation cannot proceed (ocassionally if only one party in a large group refuses, you can still proceed, but that's not the point). Since you were the only person to sign the mediation, and it was posted for some days, mediation could not occur. As to your question, I'm not exactly sure what the policy word-for-word is on using an organization's own material in an article would be, but make sure whatever you use is Verifiable and Neutral. Hope this helps. -^demon 12:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome

I don't know whether you meant "thank you and KISS," or "thank you and kiss." I'm going to assume the latter. :-) SlimVirgin 13:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear .244

Dear .244, I appreciate your writing in my talk page. There is no much I can say other than "good luck to you!" I will be more than happy to discuss matters on your website (bkinfo.) This page on WIkipedia follows wikipedia's rules. Those are not my rules. It took many months of asking to ex-bks like yourself, to let Bks take part on this. The doors were always closed for us.

Now, after so many editions and admins help, we come to this point. It is a game, .244.. I am just playing my role.. just like yourself.... Best Wishes, 72.91.4.91 18:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC) Avyakt7

Arbitration

This is the kind of issue that is generally decided by the community, through mediation if necessary. The ArbCom has no special expertise or jurisdiction in giving decisions related to any content disputes. Dmcdevit·t 06:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)