Revision as of 23:47, 8 November 2006 edit82.81.16.213 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:35, 12 November 2006 edit undo69.143.254.116 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
hypocracy/Antisemitism? | hypocracy/Antisemitism? | ||
:Well aren't you racist toward arabs then? Their "propaganda machine" which probably doesn't really exist.] 15:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:35, 12 November 2006
November 8, 2006 Retaliation/shelling
Changed this from the former to the latter. No mention in the article of this being Israeli retaliation, and the point of the article is not the context in which it happened but the event itself. Several shells fell, killing eighteen. "Retaliation" sounds POV. Puddleman 21:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
don't belive to the arabs propoganda machine
they know very well how to pose in front of a camera and making themselves "suffering" but,to host terrorists,who know they are "operating" from "civilian" concentrations,knowing that the Israeli Army is the most humane Army in the world,and other armies (like Russian,French,British,and American) don't care about how the "world will respond". so the terrorists keep firing bombs intentionally towards Israeli towns (like Sderot) but Israel,of course,cannot retaliate even with the smallest force,because if they do,it will be a "massecre" right?
I wonder,if Mexico would have done the same thing to America even once,not in the course of 6 years,what the united states would have done...
lets face it,if other Army "accidently" bombs a mosque,or a wedding,no one cares... but if israel will do a 1% of that,the whole world will awake suddenley (this is said not only for this event but also in general)
hypocracy/Antisemitism?
- Well aren't you racist toward arabs then? Their "propaganda machine" which probably doesn't really exist.69.143.254.116 15:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)