| Revision as of 15:37, 12 November 2006 editWarrior on Terrorism (talk | contribs)290 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:01, 12 November 2006 edit undoIgor21 (talk | contribs)525 edits 11-MNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Okay so we setup a new poll ], but can anon users vote? (I'm referring to 138.25.252.110's vote.) ] 05:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | Okay so we setup a new poll ], but can anon users vote? (I'm referring to 138.25.252.110's vote.) ] 05:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :They can try. I guess the admin who tallies the responses will look at the anon's history. This seems to be a unique IP with a modest contribution history over quite a few months. I really don't know their standards there - it's hard to call the play from this distance. <font face="Verdana">]<sup>'']]''</sup></font> 05:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | :They can try. I guess the admin who tallies the responses will look at the anon's history. This seems to be a unique IP with a modest contribution history over quite a few months. I really don't know their standards there - it's hard to call the play from this distance. <font face="Verdana">]<sup>'']]''</sup></font> 05:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == 11-M == | |||
| Hi Durova, | |||
| Just for the record, I answer Randroide comments, | |||
| 1)The quotes are not from a blog but are from a forum in the official website of the conspirationists so one that heavily supports Pedro J. I took it from there because if were not true would have been contradicted by the administrators who are known as fanatic supporters of the "cause". | |||
| 2)Randroide was simulating that he was sincerely interested in the issue so I tried to help him references and tips. I should have not been so moron since he was only trying to evade himself from the fact that El Mundo investigations are completely unsupported by any world class newspaper execept one phrase in one article in the Guardian. Anyway this issue is completely unrelated with the article and I named just to give some context. Randroide engage inmediately as a way to evade. | |||
| 3)I am a person who normally works with books. If required I can offer books that explain the process that leads to the coup d'etat in 1981 and the implication of LM Anson that is well known here. The problem is that I suspect that Randroide insistence on this is just another way to evade from the main question so I will no be so moron again to engage. | |||
| Randroide is trying to use you as you probably have noticed.--] 16:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:01, 12 November 2006
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting --~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Question
Okay so we setup a new poll here, but can anon users vote? (I'm referring to 138.25.252.110's vote.) Zarbat 05:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- They can try. I guess the admin who tallies the responses will look at the anon's history. This seems to be a unique IP with a modest contribution history over quite a few months. I really don't know their standards there - it's hard to call the play from this distance. Durova 05:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
11-M
Hi Durova,
Just for the record, I answer Randroide comments,
1)The quotes are not from a blog but are from a forum in the official website of the conspirationists so one that heavily supports Pedro J. I took it from there because if were not true would have been contradicted by the administrators who are known as fanatic supporters of the "cause".
2)Randroide was simulating that he was sincerely interested in the issue so I tried to help him references and tips. I should have not been so moron since he was only trying to evade himself from the fact that El Mundo investigations are completely unsupported by any world class newspaper execept one phrase in one article in the Guardian. Anyway this issue is completely unrelated with the article and I named just to give some context. Randroide engage inmediately as a way to evade.
3)I am a person who normally works with books. If required I can offer books that explain the process that leads to the coup d'etat in 1981 and the implication of LM Anson that is well known here. The problem is that I suspect that Randroide insistence on this is just another way to evade from the main question so I will no be so moron again to engage.
Randroide is trying to use you as you probably have noticed.--Igor21 16:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)