| Revision as of 10:21, 22 December 2004 editEnochlau (talk | contribs)18,866 editsm →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:17, 22 December 2004 edit undoBrokenSegue (talk | contribs)Administrators13,401 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| * '''Oppose'''. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. ]|] 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC) | * '''Oppose'''. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. ]|] 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC) | ||
| * Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. ] 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) | * Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. ] 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Oppose''' Sadly tooo blury ]]] 12:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear:both;" /> | <br style="clear:both;" /> | ||
Revision as of 12:17, 22 December 2004
London ISS
This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.
- Oppose. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ed g2s • talk 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. grendel|khan 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
- Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. Enochlau 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose Sadly tooo blury ] 12:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)