| Revision as of 11:56, 15 November 2006 editChrislk02 (talk | contribs)29,820 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:00, 15 November 2006 edit undoElaragirl (talk | contribs)3,865 edits →[]: Delete it now, before it infects other pages!Next edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| *'''Delete''' as OR. ] 10:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as OR. ] 10:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Pure originial research. ] 11:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - Pure originial research. ] 11:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete and Salt''' - You can't fairly even call this screed research. Original blatant nonsense, maybe. We need a policy page called WP:WTF? | |||
Revision as of 14:00, 15 November 2006
The Zelda Age
OR, no sources. Originally PRODded and PROD2'd, the original author removed the tag and made a personal attack on the editor who was gracious enough to let them know that the prod had been placed on their article, going so far as to say, I have original content, and you cant stop me. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete — Delete per nomination. Signed by a certain "Michael, Boise, ID", and the overall article is highly speculative and seems more like a blog rant than an article. –- kungming·2 | · 00:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - yep, it's original content alright. The catch is that we can stop him. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure whether this is going to meet with the creator's approval, but I've suggested userfication on the article's talk page. He seems attached to the work (which is probably a recipe for disaster around here anyway), so perhaps this would be the fairest solution. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 03:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Per above, stupid article. Missvain 01:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete delete per all above. It does sound like a blog as Kungming2 pointed out. James086 01:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as original research. "I have original content, and you cant stop me." lolol! Pwned. I think he fails to realize that Misplaced Pages reports facts, not opinions. Axem Titanium 01:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. By the author's admission of original research on his talk page, and his personal attacks against the users who tagged the article for deletion -- going so far as to say they were jealous of his writing skills (and gee that one HUGE paragraph of an article really shows great writing skills)! Wavy G
- Delete per nomination - original research - Additionally the cited sources speak nothing of the article's content only it's context. - wtfunkymonkey 01:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above, fails WP:OR --Steve (Slf67) 02:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NEO -- Librarianofages 02:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. MER-C 03:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete NEO / OR. Mishatx 03:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 03:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Wow, theres 3 minutes I'll never get back again (per all above) :( Wikipediarules2221 04:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Why wasn't this speedied?? Spawn Man 04:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Stukkk 05:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ahh yes, the Zelda age came right after the Jomon period if I recall. (How the heck is this related to Japan may I ask?) Thanks, Spawn Man 06:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, unverified original research. JIP | Talk 07:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Original Research, etc. Spinach Dip 08:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like original research. Atlantis Hawk 09:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - OR, unencyclopaedic tone. BTLizard 09:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as OR. Percy Snoodle 10:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Pure originial research. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 11:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and Salt - You can't fairly even call this screed research. Original blatant nonsense, maybe. We need a policy page called WP:WTF?