Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Personal attacks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:16, 15 November 2006 editThulean (talk | contribs)394 edits →New reports: Adding Psychohistorian← Previous edit Revision as of 16:26, 15 November 2006 edit undoThulean (talk | contribs)394 edits →New reports: Adding LSLMNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


==New reports== ==New reports==
==={{User|LSLM}}===
*Reported before and warned by an admin:

*Continued personal attacks:

*Warned again:

*Continues:
] 16:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

==={{User|Psychohistorian}}=== ==={{User|Psychohistorian}}===
*First of all there is this. . No biggie but lets continue... *First of all there is this. . No biggie but lets continue...

Revision as of 16:26, 15 November 2006

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards


    Red crossThis is a failed proposal.
    Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump.
    This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
    Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
    ShortcutThis page is intended to get attention quickly when dealing with personal attacks. It is not intended to serve as a form of mediation or a type of RFC. Only Personal attacks are dealt with on this page, on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's No Personal Attacks policy

    For editors who want a personal attack situation reviewed:

    1. Consider that in most cases, ignoring the attack is better than requesting sanction against the attacker. Do not report people if you are likewise guilty of hostility towards them.
    2. Make sure the user has actually commited a personal attack. (Please note that "personal attacks" are defined only under the WP:NPA policy. If a statement is not considered a personal attack under the intended spirit of this policy, it does not belong here.)
    3. The editor must have been warned earlier. The {{npa2}}, and {{npa3}} templates may be appropriate for new users; for long-term editors, it's preferable to write something rather than using a standard template. Reports of unwarned editors may be removed.
    4. If the behavior hasn't stopped, add the following header to the New Reports section of this page in the following format:
      ==={{User|NAME OF USER}}=== replacing NAME OF USER with the user name or IP address concerned, with a brief reason for listing below. Be sure to include diffs.
    5. If an editor removes the IP or username and doesn't handle the matter to your satisfaction, take it to the editor's talk page or the administrators' noticeboard, but do not re-list the user here.
    6. NB - Due to misunderstanding of these instructions and/or mis-use of this process, comments not in strict adhereance to these instructions WILL be removed. This page deals only with personal attacks under the policy WP:NPA. Reports deemed to be inappropriate for this page are liable to be moved to an appropriate venue where one exists.


    For those reported on this page:

    1. A reviewer or an administrator will review each report on this page. In dealing with the report, the contribution history of the reported user shall be checked along with the diffs provided in the report. Where no personal attack is evident, then no action will be taken - however, should an administrator see that another seperate issue is evident, appropriate action or advice for that issue may be taken/given at his or her discretion and in line with wiki policy.
    2. Reports on this page stand on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. As such, disputes and discussions over reports are not suitable for this page except for such comments left by admins or reviewers describing their actions and/or findings. If you notice your account reported at this page, please trust that the administrators and reviewers dealing with reports will deal with it in an even-handed and fair manner on the basis of policy alone. If you feel strongly that another "side to the story", issue, or another piece of information is missing from a report please refrain from posting here, and instead leave your comment on your talk page under the title NPA Report or another other clear and related title. The reviewing party will see this message and take it into account where applicable.

    For users handling assistance requests:

    1. For each of the users linked here, open their contributions and check for personal attacks. Also check if the users have been sufficiently warned for the current personal attack and whether they've continued to commit personal attacks after being warned.
    2. Note that there is an important difference between a user who makes many good contributions and a few personal attacks, and a user whose last edits are (nearly) all personal attacks or other conflict.
    3. Do nothing, warn them again, or, if you are an adminstrator, block the user in question as you think is required. Explain things carefully to the user who listed the attacker if you feel there's been a misunderstanding.
    4. Move the report to the Open Reports section and give an update to the status of the report.
    5. Delete old reports that have been dealt with.

    Please consider adding this page to your watchlist to make life easier for non-administrator RC-patrollers.

    New reports

    LSLM (talk · contribs)

    • Reported before and warned by an admin:
    • Continued personal attacks:
    • Warned again:
    • Continues:

    Thulean 16:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    Psychohistorian (talk · contribs)

    • First of all there is this. . No biggie but lets continue...
    • And here: . While "you are not knowledgable about this" is acceptable, it's quite different from "while I grant that it might seem that way to someone who is not as knowledgable or comfortable with a subject as is the majority of people."
    • And finally..."Since this fact is eluding you, I'll see if I can find a third party who can simplify it and put it at your level"
    • His warnings:

    Thulean 16:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    Jaakko Sivonen (talk · contribs)

    User Jaakko Sivonen (talk · contribs) has removed content from the page of another user and made a strong personal insult.

    The edit comment is Finnish for 'f_ck you' or 'f_ck off'. JdeJ 09:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    I forgot to add that the user had already been warned once before after this attack om another user. JdeJ 12:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    208.101.4.34 (talk · contribs)

    Serious personal attacks on Tamil people . Twice. The user's talk page has many many warnings already. --16 15:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    Open reports

    NazireneMystic (talk · contribs)

    Please warn user NazireneMystic to refrain from personal attacks and remove offending material from the Talk:Ebionites page (from to the end of the talk page). This user posted his user page Here I will show evidence of notibility and VfD proceedings of a deleted stub Articals for deletion log for Ebionite restoration movement complete with to meatpuppets and one admin that may had been duped by User:Ovadyah|Ovadyah on the talk page along with numerous personal attacks against myself and another editor (eg. seeArtical POV and .

    If reading about your actions feels like a personal attack change your actionsNazireneMystic 08:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    This user has ignored repeated requests to respect Wikiquette guidlines posted on the talk page and has been given two prior npa3 warnings about personal attacks, Good faith? and meatpupppets. Thank you. Ovadyah 03:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    I dought there is a guidline wikipedia has that you not only break every day but lawyer around them to use them for reason contrary to what they were meant for from what ive seen if an action were taken against me compaired to what ive had to put up with from you it would be like getting a speeding ticket at the Brick Yard 400NazireneMystic 08:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    This user was also asked to stop one last time on talk page again after receiving the second npa3 warning. Ovadyah 04:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    Ovadyah,

    You can ask me to stop exposing your wikipedian lawyering tactics 1000 times but I do not care. If I did not almost daily point out how your tring to dominate the Ebionite artical with extreme POV it would had been totaly over ran months ago. Your upset because someone is calling you on your endless crap. If I were a nice guy I would had been ran off the artical long ago like you did to keith ackers who is actualy listed as a scholar and source for the artical if who ever is reading this realy cares to learn whats been going on contact Keith for one and he might tell you how these wikipedians have been acting and be sure to take the time to go through the archive pages so you can see the wild tactics used so far to push Ovadyah's POV its been quiet an experience here at wikipedia. If ovadyah is sensitive then Ovadyah should not be ingaging in such thingsNazireneMystic 08:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    This user constantly trolls my contribution logs. I am changing my request to a warning and a temporary block. I have also invited several editors involved in the Ebionites article or AfD to comment. Ovadyah 08:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    Did you invite the other meatpuppet?NazireneMystic 08:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    I alerted co-editor Loremaster, Alecmconroy from RFC, and admin Jayjg to the notice, if they wish to expand on my comments. Ovadyah 14:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
    Neither of you are behaving very well in this instance. Ovadyah, please provide specific diffs. Proto::type 15:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
    As no warning (other than some unnecessary ones from Oyidah at an earlier date) were issued, I've warned NazireneMystic for this edit, which was unacceptable. I would hope that unless he/she continues making edits of this kind, the matter is now closed. Proto::type 15:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    Administrator blows referee whistle - this is not the place to conduct a dispute. 24 hour block issued. Durova 01:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    Thank you very much. It should be noted, however, that this user has already evaded the block by copying his talk page to another alias, User_talk:SpiritualEbionite. Ovadyah 01:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    Donnachadelong (talk · contribs)

    User:Donnachadelong often makes insulting or derogatory comments to me or other editors. He was warned three times about this. 1 2 3

    right-wing wreckers and POV-pusher – other "right-wing wrecker" he is mentioning is User:172

    clearly you do have a problem understanding plain English

    Are you deliberately dense or just plain stupid?

    God some of you people talk rubbish.

    eltist right-wing wreckers

    You're like the Mormons with their post-mortem conversions.

    hilarious and brainwashed

    bleedin' minority who dig up graves

    hypocrit

    -- Vision Thing -- 22:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    31 hour block. Durova 01:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
    Absolute bullshit Intangible 12:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

    John Spikowski (talk · contribs)

    This user attacked me and the PanoTools Group several times and this is now my third PAIN. The latest attack can be seen here . As you can see on his talk page he already got several admin warnings , , , including a Personal Attacks - Last Warning for his older attacks which you can find in this history , . As you can imagine we (The members of PanoTools.org) are really tired of this person. Please help. --Wuz 02:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    I've gone ahead and left a 48 hour block for violations of WP:CIVIL. Suggest Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution: it's unlikely that civility blocks alone would resolve this issue. If the person seems unwilling to compromise then try a user conduct WP:RFC. Durova 03:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
    Categories: