| Revision as of 17:30, 26 January 2019 editResnjari (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users27,438 edits →Pics in article← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:23, 26 January 2019 edit undoKtrimi991 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users12,574 edits →Pics in article: CmtTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| :They are not based on ], that's your opnion, which is incorrect. Grafiti of some anti-Nato expression has nothing to do with the main article and is just propaganda from the anti-Nato camp. They shouldn't be in the article cause they don't contribute anything, someone making graffiti doesn't make it "majority support for anti-nato", provide sources and write in the text about it, but some graffiti pictures are not relevant. ] (]) 17:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC) | :They are not based on ], that's your opnion, which is incorrect. Grafiti of some anti-Nato expression has nothing to do with the main article and is just propaganda from the anti-Nato camp. They shouldn't be in the article cause they don't contribute anything, someone making graffiti doesn't make it "majority support for anti-nato", provide sources and write in the text about it, but some graffiti pictures are not relevant. ] (]) 17:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ::They do, they reflect a view and give a visual of that view. There is opposition to NATO in the country and its not a clear cut one way street of support.] (]) 17:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC) | ::They do, they reflect a view and give a visual of that view. There is opposition to NATO in the country and its not a clear cut one way street of support.] (]) 17:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
| :::The topic of the article has two main views: One of the supporters of NATO in Macedonia and one of those Macedonians who oppose NATO. Both deserve pics. ] (]) 18:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:23, 26 January 2019
 | NATO (inactive) | |||
| ||||
.svg){kind=small} | Europe Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Macedonia request for comment
The Centralized discussion set up to decide on a comprehensive naming convention about Macedonia-related naming practices is now inviting comments on a number of competing proposals from the community. Please register your opinions on the RfC subpages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. (Pages 2 and 4 deal with the conventions most directly affecting this article.)
Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Accession of Macedonia to NATO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205022148/http://www.angus-reid.com:80/polls/view/30120 to http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/30120
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005222742/http://english.capital.gr/news.asp?id=578168&catid=&subcat=&spcatid=&djcatid=90 to http://english.capital.gr/news.asp?id=578168&catid=&subcat=&spcatid=&djcatid=90
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Pics in article
There are two pics. They are of graffiti in Ohrid. Recent removals are on reasons based on wp:idontlikeit (i.e: "This is anti-nato propaganda. And makes the article not neutral" ) more then anything else. There is a segment of the population that opposes NATO. That has fluctuated over the years. The data in the article on support numbers is from 2008. No editor has bothered to put more current numbers about support/opposition in the article and also how that is reflected among the two large communities of Macedonians and Albanians in the country. I don't see why pictures of the sort that has a view about NATO from the country reflected as graffiti should not be in the article. The pictures where taken in Ohrid and these pieces of text where in prominent locations. If people have pictures of pro-NATO sentiment, they are more then welcome to place pictures, etc.Resnjari (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- They are not based on wp:idontlikeit, that's your opnion, which is incorrect. Grafiti of some anti-Nato expression has nothing to do with the main article and is just propaganda from the anti-Nato camp. They shouldn't be in the article cause they don't contribute anything, someone making graffiti doesn't make it "majority support for anti-nato", provide sources and write in the text about it, but some graffiti pictures are not relevant. Ljuvlig (talk) 17:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- They do, they reflect a view and give a visual of that view. There is opposition to NATO in the country and its not a clear cut one way street of support.Resnjari (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- The topic of the article has two main views: One of the supporters of NATO in Macedonia and one of those Macedonians who oppose NATO. Both deserve pics. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- They do, they reflect a view and give a visual of that view. There is opposition to NATO in the country and its not a clear cut one way street of support.Resnjari (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)