Misplaced Pages

Talk:Human rights abuses in Kashmir: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:34, 28 January 2019 edit39.33.42.140 (talk) havescarop: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 03:43, 28 January 2019 edit undo39.33.42.140 (talk) Blanked the pageTags: Blanking talk page blankingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{controversial}}
{{Ds/talk notice|IPA|style=long}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Human Rights|class=start|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Crime|class=|importance=}}
{{WPMILHIST|class=C|B1=y|B2=n|B3=n|B4=y|B5=y|Indian=yes}}
{{WP India|class=Start|importance=mid|jandk=yes| jandk-importance=high|map-needed=yes|needs-infobox=yes|image-needed=yes|attention=yes}}
{{WikiProject Pakistan|class=start|importance=mid|Kashmir=yes|Gilgit=yes}}
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index
|mask=/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes
}}
]
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 2
|minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:Human rights abuses in Kashmir/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{archive box |auto=long |age=180 }}
{{Old AfD multi|page=Human rights abuses in Kashmir|date=11 April 2013|result='''no consensus'''}}
<!---New comments start at the bottom of the page. Dont comment above this line -->

== Removal of longstanding content ==

DbigXray your frequent content removal appears seems unjustifiable.
You remove content by falsely labelling it to be violating NFC, when it does not. It is ] and existed here since 2014.
You are misrepresenting sources as well by repeating the human rights abuses carried out in Pakistan's side while minimizing the human rights abuses by Indian side as "alleged" or "carried out during India's counter terrorism operations".
"carried out during India's counter terrorism operations" is not supported by the source but it appears to be your own ].
I can go own but this should be enough to state that your edits are misleading. '']''] 16:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
*As shown in it was you who added this content in a mass copying that violated both internal and external copyrights without providing any attribution to the wikipedia article from where you copied this content.
*I have removed the blatantly copied content again as it is a blatant ] violation(s) that included large scale copying of content from ] if you add this again in this article then you will be reported for ], please consider yourself warned. This article is not on AFSPA, so mass copying from the act is not allowed. please explain why it is ] in this article when the article already contains an internal wikilink to AFSPA.
*Lot of copyright violations exist on wikipedia articles for several years, which does not mean that it is somehow ok or is allowed.
*Nothing is misleading, you need to read the book properly, the , the following
*{{talkquote|...documentation of unlawful counterterrorist excesses by India including arbitrary detention, disappearances,..}}
*Since you have been proved wrong now you should strike off or remove your baseless accusation of misrepresentation in your comment above. --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 01:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

== havescarop ==

:::Content is not a violation of ] since it is properly attributed to and is freely available.
::::Again you should tell where sources say "carried out during India's counter terrorism operations"? It says "unlawful counterterrorist excesses by India including arbitrary detention, disappearances" where as you are misrepresenting it like the alleged abuses like torture, detention, etc. by Indian forces occurred only during the valid counter terrorist operations when source is contradicts it by saying "unlawful".
:::As for the content you are removing by falsely claiming it as a violation of copyrights is actually covered by gazillions reliable sources in relation to this subject. Why it should not be here? ] (]) 03:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:43, 28 January 2019