Revision as of 12:41, 29 January 2019 editאגם רפאלי (talk | contribs)281 edits →Notability: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:10, 30 January 2019 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
] Would you care to elaborate on what you are missing in order to remove the ] tag? The article currently has multiple sources (Forbes and Business Insider articles) that offer significant coverage according to the ]. On top of that there is plenty of records showing that Fuld is well published. ] (]) 12:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC) | ] Would you care to elaborate on what you are missing in order to remove the ] tag? The article currently has multiple sources (Forbes and Business Insider articles) that offer significant coverage according to the ]. On top of that there is plenty of records showing that Fuld is well published. ] (]) 12:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
:I originally tagged it for both notability and promotionalism. It think that at present you are correct that it shows at least borderline notability, but it is straightforward promotionalism and advertising for him, using vague terms of praise , and I have tagged ti accordingly. The guide here is to write not what he would want to say about himself, but what a reader hearing his name might want to know about him. Either you can fix it or I can or someone else, but unfixable promotionalism is a reason for deletion. . ''']''' (]) 06:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:10, 30 January 2019
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
Move back to article space
Britishfinance - I've made some changes. Do you feel comfortable moving the article back to the article space now? אגם רפאלי (talk) 13:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- אגם רפאלי. Geat job on providing references, will move it to the Mainspace now. Note that it would be great if you include the date in the reference citation (both date of the newspaper article, and the date you accessed it), as it adds to the quality and relevance of the reference. thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Notability
DGG Would you care to elaborate on what you are missing in order to remove the wikipedia:notability tag? The article currently has multiple sources (Forbes and Business Insider articles) that offer significant coverage according to the general notability guideline. On top of that there is plenty of records showing that Fuld is well published. אגם רפאלי (talk) 12:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I originally tagged it for both notability and promotionalism. It think that at present you are correct that it shows at least borderline notability, but it is straightforward promotionalism and advertising for him, using vague terms of praise , and I have tagged ti accordingly. The guide here is to write not what he would want to say about himself, but what a reader hearing his name might want to know about him. Either you can fix it or I can or someone else, but unfixable promotionalism is a reason for deletion. . DGG ( talk ) 06:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)