Revision as of 02:53, 16 November 2006 editBlueLotusLK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,504 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 03:02, 16 November 2006 edit undo152.91.9.144 (talk) {{subst:at}} speedy keepNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was speedy keep - references from ], etc. - ] 03:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}} | ||
:{{la|Godwin's Law}} | :{{la|Godwin's Law}} | ||
This is completely unimportant, and doesn't deserve its own article. Dumb geek chatter, that's what it is. Most of the pages that show up on Google with this term are blogs and similar personal pages. You're never going to find this on any serious media article. ] 02:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | This is completely unimportant, and doesn't deserve its own article. Dumb geek chatter, that's what it is. Most of the pages that show up on Google with this term are blogs and similar personal pages. You're never going to find this on any serious media article. ] 02:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Revision as of 03:02, 16 November 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep - references from Wired, etc. - 152.91.9.144 03:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Godwin's Law
This is completely unimportant, and doesn't deserve its own article. Dumb geek chatter, that's what it is. Most of the pages that show up on Google with this term are blogs and similar personal pages. You're never going to find this on any serious media article. BlueLotas 02:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.