| Revision as of 23:01, 18 January 2019 view sourceLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,670,748 edits →Your [] nomination of []: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:33, 5 February 2019 view source Davidgoodheart (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users153,301 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| My work on my last GA ] is finished and so am I. I see the writing on the wall and see no reason to waste the community’s time any further. Clearly, I am not wanted here, probably never will be. My thinking is any apologies will be seen as empty words or “deceitful”, so I will not give any. I genuinely believed I was following the unblocking admin {{u|TonyBallioni}}’s interpretation of consensus—to avoid creating controversy with disruptive edits—but I was clearly wrong and should have taken the advice of others instead. I will be viewed as a liar, self-destructive, deceitful, etc. I deserve all that. Following an actual tban would have been incredibly easy to accomplish, but I clearly did not earn that opportunity. So long. ] (]) 02:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC) | My work on my last GA ] is finished and so am I. I see the writing on the wall and see no reason to waste the community’s time any further. Clearly, I am not wanted here, probably never will be. My thinking is any apologies will be seen as empty words or “deceitful”, so I will not give any. I genuinely believed I was following the unblocking admin {{u|TonyBallioni}}’s interpretation of consensus—to avoid creating controversy with disruptive edits—but I was clearly wrong and should have taken the advice of others instead. I will be viewed as a liar, self-destructive, deceitful, etc. I deserve all that. Following an actual tban would have been incredibly easy to accomplish, but I clearly did not earn that opportunity. So long. ] (]) 02:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi. Per the closing comment , there's a community consensus to reimpose the indefinite block on this account. I appreciate this is not the outcome you'd have wished for, though not unexpected given the retirement notice above. As this is a community sanction, if you're interested in seeking a future unblock it should be via one of the paths outlined at ]. If not, thanks for finishing your responses on the von Kluge GA, and all the best for wherever your online interests take you. -- ] (]) 10:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC) | :Hi. Per the closing comment , there's a community consensus to reimpose the indefinite block on this account. I appreciate this is not the outcome you'd have wished for, though not unexpected given the retirement notice above. As this is a community sanction, if you're interested in seeking a future unblock it should be via one of the paths outlined at ]. If not, thanks for finishing your responses on the von Kluge GA, and all the best for wherever your online interests take you. -- ] (]) 10:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
| Hi Grace, I just wanted to say that even though we always didn't agree on things in the past that I do feel bad that your retiring, as I almost retired before due to frustration that I was feeling. I also know how is feels not to be wanted, and boy it surely doesn't feel good, so I can clearly empathize with you on that one. I wish you good luck in the future and I hope all is well for you. Take care and I hope that you feel better soon! ] (]) 23:43, 16 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | == Your ] nomination of ]== | ||
Revision as of 00:33, 5 February 2019
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.Final comment
My work on my last GA Günther von Kluge is finished and so am I. I see the writing on the wall and see no reason to waste the community’s time any further. Clearly, I am not wanted here, probably never will be. My thinking is any apologies will be seen as empty words or “deceitful”, so I will not give any. I genuinely believed I was following the unblocking admin TonyBallioni’s interpretation of consensus—to avoid creating controversy with disruptive edits—but I was clearly wrong and should have taken the advice of others instead. I will be viewed as a liar, self-destructive, deceitful, etc. I deserve all that. Following an actual tban would have been incredibly easy to accomplish, but I clearly did not earn that opportunity. So long. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi. Per the closing comment here, there's a community consensus to reimpose the indefinite block on this account. I appreciate this is not the outcome you'd have wished for, though not unexpected given the retirement notice above. As this is a community sanction, if you're interested in seeking a future unblock it should be via one of the paths outlined at WP:UNBAN. If not, thanks for finishing your responses on the von Kluge GA, and all the best for wherever your online interests take you. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Günther von Kluge
The article Günther von Kluge you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Günther von Kluge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 23:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)