| Revision as of 19:10, 1 February 2019 editKoA (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,866 edits →Disambiguation link notification for February 1: fixed, thanks bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:14, 10 February 2019 edit undoFeydHuxtable (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,615 edits →Bugs: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| I'm sometimes online sporadically, although typically at least once a day unless it's around the weekend. I'll usually respond pretty quickly to any questions, but real life takes priority, so I may not always be the quickest to respond. Thanks for your patience if I'm offline for a bit. | I'm sometimes online sporadically, although typically at least once a day unless it's around the weekend. I'll usually respond pretty quickly to any questions, but real life takes priority, so I may not always be the quickest to respond. Thanks for your patience if I'm offline for a bit. | ||
| {{Archives |auto= short|search= yes |bot= MiszaBot |age= 30 |collapsible=yes}} | {{Archives |auto= short|search= yes |bot= MiszaBot |age= 30 |collapsible=yes}} | ||
| == Bugs == | |||
| My dear King, it had been my intention to never again edit an article about bugs. This was per the difficulty we had in collaborating in a collegial way, and as I'd previously considered bug decline to be only about no 12 on the list of major threats to human life on this planet. Sadly, the on the matter suggests my assessment was wildly optimistic. Per your advice I've tried not to act too quickly on this, but now that hundreds of entomologist, ecologists and policy consultants have reacted, I've not yet found a single credible person who is critical about the review. I wish there was some reason to doubt the findings– there is enough nonsense going on without the threat that unless we can significantly slow the bug decline in the next couple of decades, our planet will be condemned to an irreversible ecological collapse, which will inevitably lead to the near total extinction of human life. | |||
| Hopefully you might see the review as just as must a game changer as I do. So our views may become more aligned, and we can collaborate in a friendly way. On the other hand, if we find ourselves continuing to dispute, at least good news from your PoV may be that, per the findings of the review, I can now agree that DS may become applicable. Or as we say in my world, big boys games, big boys rules. ] (]) 21:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:14, 10 February 2019
I'm sometimes online sporadically, although typically at least once a day unless it's around the weekend. I'll usually respond pretty quickly to any questions, but real life takes priority, so I may not always be the quickest to respond. Thanks for your patience if I'm offline for a bit.
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Bugs
My dear King, it had been my intention to never again edit an article about bugs. This was per the difficulty we had in collaborating in a collegial way, and as I'd previously considered bug decline to be only about no 12 on the list of major threats to human life on this planet. Sadly, the first ever formal review paper on the matter suggests my assessment was wildly optimistic. Per your advice I've tried not to act too quickly on this, but now that hundreds of entomologist, ecologists and policy consultants have reacted, I've not yet found a single credible person who is critical about the review. I wish there was some reason to doubt the findings– there is enough nonsense going on without the threat that unless we can significantly slow the bug decline in the next couple of decades, our planet will be condemned to an irreversible ecological collapse, which will inevitably lead to the near total extinction of human life.
Hopefully you might see the review as just as must a game changer as I do. So our views may become more aligned, and we can collaborate in a friendly way. On the other hand, if we find ourselves continuing to dispute, at least good news from your PoV may be that, per the findings of the review, I can now agree that DS may become applicable. Or as we say in my world, big boys games, big boys rules. FeydHuxtable (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)