Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages/to do: Difference between revisions

< Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:37, 16 February 2019 editGoingBatty (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers636,916 edits Add more recent examples← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:39, 16 February 2019 edit undoGoingBatty (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers636,916 edits added {{bulleted list}}Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\|verify=		\|verify=
	\|cleanup= Merge ] with ].		\|cleanup= Merge ] with ].
	\|expand=		\|expand={{bulleted list
	*Expand ] a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.		\|Expand ] a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
	*Should there be something on ] - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?		\|Should there be something on ] - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
	*Find references where called for		\|Find references where called for
	*Add more recent examples		\|Add more recent examples
			}}
	\|disambiguation=		\|disambiguation=
	\|stubs=		\|stubs=
Line 16:		Line 17:
	\|npov=		\|npov=
	\|infobox=		\|infobox=
	\|other= *Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. ], ], ], ], ], ], ] etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see ]). Discuss overlap with ] and clarify the scope of the two articles.		\|other= Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. ], ], ], ], ], ], ] etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see ]). Discuss overlap with ] and clarify the scope of the two articles.
	}}		}}

Revision as of 19:39, 16 February 2019

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Merge Criticism of Misplaced Pages#Systemic bias in coverage with Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Coverage.
Expand :
- Expand lead a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
- Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
- Find references where called for
- Add more recent examples
Other : Discuss changing the subject of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. quality of Misplaced Pages, quality and comprehensiveness of Misplaced Pages, evaluation of Misplaced Pages, assessment of Misplaced Pages, appraisal of Misplaced Pages, perspectives on Misplaced Pages, reception of Misplaced Pages etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Article name). Discuss overlap with criticism of Misplaced Pages and clarify the scope of the two articles.