Misplaced Pages

Supreme Tribunal of Justice (Venezuela): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:05, 30 January 2019 editHaakonsson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,544 editsm fix ref error← Previous edit Revision as of 20:28, 24 February 2019 edit undo198.179.81.30 (talk)No edit summaryTag: references removedNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
| website = | website =
| chiefjudgetitle = President | chiefjudgetitle = President
| chiefjudgename = Miguel Ángel Martín | chiefjudgename = Maikel Moreno
| termstart = 2014
| Maikel José Moreno Pérez (disputed)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://panampost.com/sabrina-martin/2017/02/27/venezuelas-new-supreme-court-president-is-a-convicted-felon-with-a-shady-past/|title=Venezuela’s New Supreme Court President Is a Convicted Felon with a Shady Past|publisher=PanamPost|date=27 February 2017}}</ref>
| termstart = July 2017
| termend = <!-- year term for current chief as chief ends, if applicable--> | termend = <!-- year term for current chief as chief ends, if applicable-->
| termend2 = <!-- year term of current chief ends if applicable--> | termend2 = <!-- year term of current chief ends if applicable-->

Revision as of 20:28, 24 February 2019

This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (June 2016)
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Spanish. (January 2019) Click for important translation instructions.
  • View a machine-translated version of the Spanish article.
  • Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Misplaced Pages.
  • Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 1,149 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization.
  • Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
  • You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Spanish Misplaced Pages article at ]; see its history for attribution.
  • You may also add the template {{Translated|es|Tribunal Supremo de Justicia de Venezuela}} to the talk page.
  • For more guidance, see Misplaced Pages:Translation.
This article is about the Supreme Tribunal of Justice which is considered illegitimate by some countries in the Americas and Europe. For the Supreme Tribunal of Justice appointed by the National Assembly in 2017, see Supreme Tribunal of Justice of Venezuela in exile.
Supreme Tribunal of Justice
Tribunal Supremo de Justicia
TSJ building in Caracas
Established1999
LocationCaracas
Authorised byConstitution of Venezuela
WebsiteOfficial website
President
CurrentlyMaikel Moreno
Since2014

The Supreme Tribunal of Justice (Template:Lang-es or TSJ) is the highest court of law in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and is the head of the judicial branch. As the independence of the Venezuelan judiciary under the regime of Nicolas Maduro is questioned, there have recently been many disputes to whether this court is legitimate.

The Supreme Tribunal may meet either in specialized chambers (of which there are six: constitutional, political/administrative, electoral, civil, criminal, and social) or in plenary session. Each chamber has five judges, except the constitutional, which has seven. Its main function is to control, according to the constitution and related laws, the constitutionality and legality of public acts.

The Supreme Tribunal's 32 justices (magistrados) are appointed by the National Assembly and serve non-renewable 12-year terms. Appointments are made by a two-thirds majority, or a simple majority if efforts to appoint a judge fail three times in a row. Under article 265 of the 1999 Constitution, judges may be removed by a two-thirds majority of the National Assembly, if the Attorney General, Comptroller General, and Human Rights Ombudsperson have previously agreed a "serious failure" and suspended the judge accordingly.

History

The Tribunal was created under the 1999 Constitution of Venezuela, replacing the Supreme Court of Venezuela. For some years provisional statutes regulated the number of judges – initially 20, with three in each chamber except the constitutional, which had five – and their selection. The statutes were replaced in 2004 by an organic law (a law required to clarify constitutional provisions). The law also permitted the National Assembly to revoke the appointment of a judge, by a simple majority, where a judge had provided false information as to his/her credentials.

Crisis in Bolivarian Venezuela

Helicopter attack

Main article: 2017 Caracas helicopter attack

Venezuela's protesters set fire to the executive directorate of the judiciary of the Supreme Court in the Chacao municipality on 12 June 2017. Violence broke out in protests at the Supreme Court over a bid to change the Constitution. On 27 June 2017, a helicopter attacked the TSJ building with gunfire and grenades.

Supreme Tribunal of Justice in exile

Main article: Supreme Tribunal of Justice in exile

The discontent with the Bolivarian government saw the opposition being elected to hold the majority in the National Assembly of Venezuela for the first time since 1999 following the 2015 Parliamentary Election. As a result of that election, the lame duck National Assembly consisting of Bolivarian officials filled the Supreme Tribunal of Justice with their allies.

Following months of unrest surrounding the recall referendum against President Maduro in 2016, on 29 March 2017 the Bolivarian Supreme Tribunal of Justice ruled that the National Assembly was "in a situation of contempt", because of the aforementioned rulings against the election of some of its members. It stripped the Assembly of legislative powers, and took those powers for itself; which meant that the Court would have been able to create laws. The court did not indicate if or when it might hand power back. As a result of the ruling, the 2017 Venezuelan protests began surrounding the constitutional crisis, with the Bolivarian Supreme Tribunal of Justice reversing its ruling on 1 April 2017.

After being stripped of power during the constitutional crisis and the call for a rewriting of the constitution by the Bolivarian government, opposition-led National Assembly of Venezuela created a Judicial Nominations Committee on 13 June 2017 to elect new members of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice. On 12 July 2017, Ombudsman Tarek Saab, head of the Moral Council of Venezuela, said that the call for new magistrates would not be officially recognized by the Bolivarian government and that the magistrates already appointed by the lame duck Bolivarian National Assembly would instead continue to be recognized. Despite the rejection of recognition by the Bolivarian government, the opposition-led National Assembly then voted 33 magistrates into office on 21 July 2017, creating a de jure Supreme Tribunal of Justice separate from the Bolivarian government.

Criticisms

Venezuela's judicial system has been deemed the most corrupt in the world by Transparency International in 2014. Human Rights Watch claimed that in 2004, President Hugo Chávez and his allies took over the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, filling it with his supporters and adding measures so the government could dismiss justices from the court. In 2010, legislators from Chávez’s political party appointed nine permanent judges and 32 stand-ins, which included several allies. They claimed that some judges may face reprisals if they rule against government interests.

It has also been alleged that the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, with the majority supporting Chávez, elected officials to the supposedly non-partisan National Electoral Council of Venezuela, despite the 1999 Constitution empowering the National Assembly of Venezuela to perform that action. This resulted in Chavistas making up a majority of the electoral council's board.

After Chávez' death and with Nicolás Maduro as president, following the 2015 National Assembly election, the lame duck National Assembly, the majority of whom were Bolivarian supporters, filled the Supreme Tribunal of Justice with Maduro allies. The tribunal then quickly stripped three new opposition lawmakers of their National Assembly seats in early 2016, citing alleged "irregularities" in their elections, thereby preventing an opposition supermajority which would have been able to challenge Maduro. The tribunal then approved several actions by Maduro and granted him more powers.

References

  1. "Senado chileno reconoce al TSJ en el exilio como autoridad legítima de Venezuela". Diario Las Americas (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-07-12.
  2. "Parlamento chileno aprueba proyecto que reconoce la legitimidad del TSJ venezolano en el exilio". La Patilla (in European Spanish). 2018-10-04. Retrieved 2018-10-05.
  3. ^ Venezuelanalysis, 17 May 2004, “The Venezuelan Judicial System always was the Cinderella of the State Powers”
  4. "Venezuela protesters set fire to Supreme Court building as crisis deepens". The Telegraph. 13 June 2017.
  5. "Venezuela crisis: Helicopter 'launches attack' on Supreme Court". BBC News. Retrieved 2017-06-28.
  6. ^ Casey, Nicholas; Torres, Patricia (30 March 2017). "Venezuela Muzzles Legislature, Moving Closer to One-Man Rule". The New York Times. p. A1. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
  7. "Venezuela's Lame-Duck Congress Names New Supreme Court Justices". Bloomberg. 23 December 2015. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
  8. "Venezuela 'coup': Alarm grows as court takes power". BBC. 31 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
  9. "Venezuela: Supreme court backtracks on powers bid". BBC. 1 April 2017. Retrieved 1 April 2017.
  10. "Asamblea Nacional continuará proceso para elección de nuevos magistrados". El Nacional (in Spanish). 2017-06-13. Retrieved 2018-07-10.
  11. "Consejo Moral Republicano rechazó listado de preseleccionados al cargo de Magistrados realizado por la AN - LaPatilla.com". La Patilla (in European Spanish). 2017-07-12. Retrieved 2018-07-10.
  12. "Venezuela: un "Tribunal Supremo de Justicia" en el exilio se instala en la OEA". Clarín (in Spanish). 12 October 2017. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
  13. "Corruption by Country/Territory: Venezuela". Transparency International. Retrieved 26 February 2014.
  14. "World Report 2012: Venezuela". Report. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
  15. ^ Hawkins, Kirk A. (2010). Venezuela's Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective (1. publ. ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521765039.
  16. "Venezuela's Lame-Duck Congress Names New Supreme Court Justices". Bloomberg. 23 December 2015. Retrieved 15 January 2019.

External links

Supreme Courts of South America
Sovereign states
Venezuela articles
History
Geography
Politics
Parties
Great Patriotic Pole
Democratic Unity Roundtable
Agreement for Change
Economy
Society
Culture
Landmarks of Caracas
Museums
Plaza O’Leary
Plaza O’Leary
Religion
Culture and sport
Government
Public art
Other
Stub icon

This government-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Stub icon

This Venezuela-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: