Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ian Pitchford: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:18, 18 November 2006 editRama's Arrow (talk | contribs)22,597 edits 24-hr block for 3RR violation on Palestine← Previous edit Revision as of 21:30, 18 November 2006 edit undoTariqabjotu (talk | contribs)Administrators36,354 edits →24-hr block for 3RR violation on []: + unblock noticeNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:


== 24-hr block for 3RR violation on ] == == 24-hr block for 3RR violation on ] ==


<div class="user-block"> ] <div class="user-block"> ]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 --> ] 20:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC) You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 --> ] 20:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

:Ian, I unblocked you as it appeared you did not violate the three-revert rule on ]. However, let this be a word of caution that another revert on ] within the next twenty-four hours will be a violation of the three-revert rule (as your reversions were not of simple vandalism). Additionally, I'd like to also remind you that misuse of VandalProof can result in your permission to use it to be revoked. Perhaps you can try to discuss your position regarding the article on ]. -- ''']''' 21:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:30, 18 November 2006

24-hr block for 3RR violation on Palestine

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Rama's arrow 20:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Ian, I unblocked you as it appeared you did not violate the three-revert rule on Palestine. However, let this be a word of caution that another revert on Palestine within the next twenty-four hours will be a violation of the three-revert rule (as your reversions were not of simple vandalism). Additionally, I'd like to also remind you that misuse of VandalProof can result in your permission to use it to be revoked. Perhaps you can try to discuss your position regarding the article on Talk:Palestine. -- tariqabjotu 21:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)