| Revision as of 00:21, 10 March 2019 editZero0000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators41,868 edits →Merge← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:44, 10 March 2019 edit undoDavidbena (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users56,648 edits →MergeNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| *'''Disagree''' ]'s land was also divided into ] and ]; how can we accommodate that, if we merge the two articles? I don't see how we can. (And yes, I unilaterally reverted your unilateral merge) ] (]) 23:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC) | *'''Disagree''' ]'s land was also divided into ] and ]; how can we accommodate that, if we merge the two articles? I don't see how we can. (And yes, I unilaterally reverted your unilateral merge) ] (]) 23:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Disagree''' If anything, a merge should be in the other direction. Articles on modern locations include sections on the history, not the other way around. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 00:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC) | *'''Disagree''' If anything, a merge should be in the other direction. Articles on modern locations include sections on the history, not the other way around. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 00:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC) | ||
| :::Even if we do not merge these two articles (usually, I'm against merging of sites where there is a common English or Hebrew name, and another one with an Arabic name), the English/Hebrew title (Achziv) is, in my view, the more commonly used name. The history of these two articles overlap; having the exact same history, excepting only after Israel became a State when the site ceased to be recognised by its Arabic name.] (]) 13:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:44, 10 March 2019
 | Protected areas Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
What about Achzivland?
... two people and a bed and breakfast, at least. +sj +
- See Akhzivland. -- Deborahjay (talk) 09:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Date under Archaeology
There appears to be a typo in the date given for the Chalcolithic Period. Can someone identify what the dates here are meant to say? Downstrike (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Merge
Propose to merge Az-Zeeb -> Achziv, due to the fact it is the same place and essentially same place name with different transliteration. The article Az-Zeeb refers only to historic time window of small Arab-populated village on the Achziv site during Mamluk, Ottoman and British eras, while multiple other cultures had also occupied Achziv (Canaanites/Phoenicians, Seleucids, Romans/Byzantines, Crusaders and lately Israelis), which altogether has a long and rich history. Both articles are too small by themselves (26kb and 9kb) and will have more information if merged together.GreyShark (dibra) 09:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Here I would agree to the merge.Davidbena (talk) 01:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- My reading of the articles is that Az-Zeeb is a current (not just historic) town and that Achziv isn't identical. I therefore oppose the merge. Klbrain (talk) 21:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Agree this is two names for the same place, so it's obvious they should be merged, or do we also want articles on Ecdeppa, Ecdippon, Achzib, az-Zib, az-Zeeb, and Ak-zi-bi? All are valid iterations of the settlement through history. (Note:.I began the difficult merging of these articles and they were reverted unilaterally reverted.) GenQuest 23:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Disagree Az-Zeeb's land was also divided into Gesher HaZiv and Sa'ar; how can we accommodate that, if we merge the two articles? I don't see how we can. (And yes, I unilaterally reverted your unilateral merge) Huldra (talk) 23:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Disagree If anything, a merge should be in the other direction. Articles on modern locations include sections on the history, not the other way around. Zero 00:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Even if we do not merge these two articles (usually, I'm against merging of sites where there is a common English or Hebrew name, and another one with an Arabic name), the English/Hebrew title (Achziv) is, in my view, the more commonly used name. The history of these two articles overlap; having the exact same history, excepting only after Israel became a State when the site ceased to be recognised by its Arabic name.Davidbena (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC)