| Revision as of 01:26, 28 December 2004 editFrancs2000 (talk | contribs)39,062 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:23, 28 December 2004 edit undoBoothy443 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,606 edits CSDNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| ==Revert== | ==Revert== | ||
| No problem, I would expect the same from any other user here. -- ] | ] 01:26, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) | No problem, I would expect the same from any other user here. -- ] | ] 01:26, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| == CSD == | |||
| I a well aware of the criteria, and the things that I have marked were well with in it as I interpret them, and as I have seen it been interpreted. --] 05:23, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:23, 28 December 2004
| Welcome to my talk page. If you want to leave criticism or question my judgement, that's fine, communication is important. If you want to have a chat, point out good or funny articles or leave suggestions or compliments, that's even better. If you want to list this page on VfD, it was funny the first five times, let's give it a rest now, ok? Please add new comment threads at the bottom of the page in a new section (click here). I'll reply on your talk page, copying what was said to keep things clear. Please sign your comments. |
| Archived talk pages: 1 2 3 |
|---|
User:ExplorerCDT
I've opened an RfC on this user for his personal attacks: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/ExplorerCDT 2. Since you're on his "nutjob" list, I thought you might be interested. --Carnildo 23:06, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Nomination for adminship
Do you want me to nominate you for adminship? Dunc|☺ 23:34, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oooh, this is flattering, you're the second person in the past month to offer to do so. I have however already been noninated for adminship (and failed to achieve consensus) already at the beginning of this month; Waiting at least a month between nominations appears to be common practice. I'd greatly appreciate your support next month though. Thanks again for the vote of confidence! --fvw* 23:40, 2004 Dec 27 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Home to Freespeech? I think not
I've been browsing the latest edited articles and even this talk page and have noticed that you, Mr. Fvw, have a habit of deleting any and all possibly controversial posts before they even have a chance to get off the ground. I don't have a problem with you going on a personal crusade to clean up wikipedia, however if you choose to do so I humbly ask that you don't pretend to represent a service that offers shelter to freespeech. There is no such thing here. The users comment that you just deleted from this talk page was a perfectly understandable response to the wreckless and hasty deletion of a defenition of "bullshitted". The word is a REAL word found in almost any notable dictionary. Why then should it be deleted? My posts on the Bush page, while immature, were just for a laugh, and, if you bothered to notice, the first few times I placed it out of the way at the bottom of the article which I left fully intact. I was merely stating my opinion. It was promptly deleted multiple times. Vandalism? No. Personal opinions, which are supposed to be welcomed here. No harm came from the post, and I certainly wouldn't take any offence to a post such as mine placed on the page of a candadate I favored. In short, please allow my posts and the posts of others like myself. Or at the very least, please don't pretend to encourage freespeech and personal opinions, because you apparently don't.
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, a FREE content encyclopedia that ANYONE can edit ... unless Fvw doesn't like it? Hmmm.
- Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary
- Misplaced Pages is not a vehicle for testing anarchism
- Sign your posts on talk pages --fvw* 23:43, 2004 Dec 27 (UTC)
I have NO, I repeat, NO obligation to reveal my identity to you. Second, where on earth did you get ANARCHISM out of my post? I have half mind to open a RfC on yourself, for what I consider a personal attack seeing as my post was nothing more than a polite suggestion that you might be representing a service that makes false claims to allowing freespeech. I also take offense to your biggoted, pompus, aloof, threeline, dead pan response to my suggestion, as if you are some how above and/or better than me.
Revert
No problem, I would expect the same from any other user here. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 01:26, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
CSD
I a well aware of the criteria, and the things that I have marked were well with in it as I interpret them, and as I have seen it been interpreted. --Boothy443 05:23, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)