| Revision as of 05:51, 30 March 2019 editFreeknowledgecreator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users179,107 edits →March 2019: add← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:57, 30 March 2019 edit undoWinged Blades of Godric (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,041 edits Adding Discretionary Sanctions Notice (ipa) (Twinkle)Tag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| :You are edit warring to violate ], making blatantly biased and unacceptable edits to an article about a living person. Stop, for all the obvious reasons. Note that per ], removal of such material is exempt from the three revert rule. ] (]) 05:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC) | :You are edit warring to violate ], making blatantly biased and unacceptable edits to an article about a living person. Stop, for all the obvious reasons. Note that per ], removal of such material is exempt from the three revert rule. ] (]) 05:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ==Important Notice== | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in ], ], and ]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ]] 05:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:57, 30 March 2019
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Covers: M
"M" is a bigger letter, so this list will come in four sections, and here is the first: M.I.S.S.I.O.N., Mach: The First Colony, Maelstrom (role-playing game), Mage (Archaeron), Maléfices, Manhunter (role-playing game), Marvel Heroic Roleplaying, Marvel Super Heroes: The Heroic Role-Playing Game, Masterbook, Mechamorphosis. BOZ (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Today I also created "Glozel est Authentique!" BOZ (talk) 14:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
More from the letter M: MEGA Role-Playing System, Mekton, Melanda: Land of Mystery, Men In Black: The Roleplaying Game, Merc (role-playing game), Merchant Class Ships, Metamorphosis Alpha, Michtim: Fluffy Adventures (current pic is terrible), Midgard (role-playing game), Midnight at the Well of Souls Role-Playing System. BOZ (talk) 00:52, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- I also just started Cities of Hârn, Goldfinger (adventure), and Dr. No (adventure). BOZ (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- I also started Chill Master's Screen today. BOZ (talk) 05:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- I did a couple more today: A Jakállan Intrigue and Deeds of the Ever-Glorious. BOZ (talk) 01:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- I am also wondering if there are any suitable cover images to be used for Dungeon World? BOZ (talk) 16:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hello BOZ. I've added pictures to most of those articles. Not sure I can justify one for Dungeon World, as it already has several. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Gotcha! How about Millennium's End, Mistborn Adventure Game, Monsterhearts, Monsters and Other Childish Things, Monsters of Myth & Legend, Monsters of Myth and Legend II, Monsters! Monsters!, Morpheus (role-playing game), Morton's List, and Most Wanted, Volume 1? BOZ (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Do you see anything good that might be used for Heavy Gear? BOZ (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hello BOZ. I'll look, but I have several other articles to get through first. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- If you see anything usable, go for it. :) BOZ (talk) 03:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hello BOZ. I'll look, but I have several other articles to get through first. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
OK, moving on to finish up the letter "M", we have: Mouse Guard Roleplaying Game, MSPE Character Folder, Mummy: The Curse, Multiverser, Mutant City Blues, Mutant Future, Mutazoids, Mutiny on the Eleanor Moraes, Mythworld. BOZ (talk) 03:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
lead on Bruno Bettelheim
Thank you for your recent edits. Making a first pass, I think your edits definitely improved the article. It's always good to have a fresh pair of eyes.
Now, yes, I continue to be unhappy with our lead, for I think we can do better. And I'm hoping perhaps you are becoming open to that as well. For example, the psychologist you created a link to, Paul R. McHugh, he wrote, "Bettelheim had no qualifications as a child psychiatrist or psychologist, having been a businessman with an art history doctorate in 1930s Vienna."
Or, to add a little humor to this whole situation -- in our article on Baby Face Nelson, should the first sentence describe him as a banking employee, and then only three or four sentences in, do we finally tell our readers, well, actually, the real story is? No, we wouldn't do that. Nor should we. And neither should we do the same in the Bettelheim article.
I'm not going to move super quickly. But I am going to take yet another look at the lead. And I invite you to do the same. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 01:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
Your recent editing history at David Frawley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ∯WBG 05:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- You are edit warring to violate WP:BLP, making blatantly biased and unacceptable edits to an article about a living person. Stop, for all the obvious reasons. Note that per WP:BLPREMOVE, removal of such material is exempt from the three revert rule. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.