Misplaced Pages

Talk:Eliezer Berland: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:45, 6 April 2019 editCullen328 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators112,333 edits →"The 'Torah path'": expand quote← Previous edit Revision as of 19:46, 6 April 2019 edit undoCullen328 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators112,333 edits →"The 'Torah path'": copy editNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:


Well, by the same token ('''logically''') what you removed at the other article was also in the source, and therefore, esp. since it was high quality historical material, should not have been removed. There is no policy coherence in the two edits. In one you can expunge a sourced statement as superfluous, in the other, you revert a challenged statement from a middling source by asserting it is ''in the source'' and therefore must stay.] (]) 19:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC) Well, by the same token ('''logically''') what you removed at the other article was also in the source, and therefore, esp. since it was high quality historical material, should not have been removed. There is no policy coherence in the two edits. In one you can expunge a sourced statement as superfluous, in the other, you revert a challenged statement from a middling source by asserting it is ''in the source'' and therefore must stay.] (]) 19:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
:The disputed content is referenced to the website of ], an educational institution that Berland founded and completely controlled for many years. The core content policy of Verifiability covers this at the section ], which excludes content that is "unduly self-serving" which certainly applies to this non-neutral "draw closer to the Torah path" content. ] ] 19:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC) :The disputed content is referenced to the website of ], an educational institution that Berland founded and completely controlled for many years. The core content policy of Verifiability covers this at the section ], which excludes content that is "unduly self-serving" and that certainly applies to this non-neutral "draw closer to the Torah path" content. ] ] 19:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:46, 6 April 2019

WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is requested that an image or photograph of Eliezer Berland be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.		Upload
WikiProject iconJudaism Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The 'Torah path'"

Can't wait to hear the rationale for this. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Restoring sourced information which is reliably sourced and 100% likely to be true. Debresser (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:BURDEN, get consensus for inclusion. Start an RfC, perhaps? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
This is relevant information and reliably sourced, so the burden is on you to show why this should not be included. Debresser (talk) 17:48, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

(a) At Jewish religious clothing‎, Debresser you removed a key historical fact from a strong academic source as 'superfluous', and continued to remove it. Remove superfluous sentence

Here (Eliezer Berland) you are challenged for including material from a so-so source, which the other editor thinks acceptable only for bare facts.

You insist on restoring what N regards as a superfluous sentence stating

Well, by the same token (logically) what you removed at the other article was also in the source, and therefore, esp. since it was high quality historical material, should not have been removed. There is no policy coherence in the two edits. In one you can expunge a sourced statement as superfluous, in the other, you revert a challenged statement from a middling source by asserting it is in the source and therefore must stay.Nishidani (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The disputed content is referenced to the website of Shuvu Bonim, an educational institution that Berland founded and completely controlled for many years. The core content policy of Verifiability covers this at the section WP:SELFPUB, which excludes content that is "unduly self-serving" and that certainly applies to this non-neutral "draw closer to the Torah path" content. Cullen Let's discuss it 19:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Categories: