| Revision as of 20:33, 20 November 2006 editAksi great (talk | contribs)10,008 edits →Warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:11, 21 November 2006 edit undoHumus sapiens (talk | contribs)27,653 edits 3RR and talkNext edit → | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| ::: Looks like our messages crossed. Yes. I was the one misinformed here. - ] (]) 20:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | ::: Looks like our messages crossed. Yes. I was the one misinformed here. - ] (]) 20:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Yes. That is the root of the problem. Don't get upset. It's easy once you get the hang of it. I thought you would be the last person to get upset by things he does. - ] (]) 20:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | ::::Yes. That is the root of the problem. Don't get upset. It's easy once you get the hang of it. I thought you would be the last person to get upset by things he does. - ] (]) 20:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == 3RR and talk == | |||
| See ]. | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> ←] <sup>]]</sup> 05:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:11, 21 November 2006
|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
Arbitration
- Your suggestion is valid and right. However, I would rather have users understand that I meant Israel as a political entity rather than the people of Israel, considering I've already made the statement. BhaiSaab 04:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Think about how it makes people feel. Fred Bauder 04:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
RE:Template
Nice job on Template:Islam by country.
thanks but please help me in filling out the red links7day 11:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Merger
Are you going to merge the muslim guild tonight or tomorrow? Dev920 (Please peer review here.) 15:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Muslim Guild is still there. Would you like me to merge it for you? Please let me know and I'd be happy to do so. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 14:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sure. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Note from Muhammad mediation
Hi there, I am just dropping you a note because you signed up to participate at Talk:Muhammad/Mediation. We have not heard from you since we started discussing proposed criteria for including images, so I'm just asking whether you plan to participate further. If so, we need you to agree or disagree to the criteria we have developed. Important note: The criteria will be used only if the group decides to include images, which will be later in the mediation. Agreeing to the criteria does not mean that you agree to including any images. Thanks! --Aguerriero (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Apology
- You have my apology for making those statements on Talk:Indian caste system. I'm striking them out.Hkelkar 03:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
BS?
- You do realize that I will check your "Muslim Connunities ref." right?
http://utdirect.utexas.edu/lib/utnetcat/full.WBX?search_type=FL&search_text=MUSLIM+COMMUNITIES+OF+SOUTH+ASIA+CULTURE+AND+SOCIETY&next_action=N&next_record_brn=000355470&loc_display_type=V http://utdirect.utexas.edu/lib/utnetcat/full.WBX?search_type=FL&search_text=MUSLIM+COMMUNITIES+OF+SOUTH+ASIA+CULTURE+AND+SOCIETY&next_action=N&next_record_brn=008360060&loc_display_type=V
Might want to consider your edits.Hkelkar 04:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
24 hr block for revertwarring on Indian caste system
Rama's arrow 13:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Re: Advocacy
Hi - ideally, we're there to advise one party, so yes, we're like a lawyer in that repsect. However, at times we try to seek compromises, which ends up with us being more like mediators. Hopefully this answers your question. Martinp23 15:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
RfaR
See User_talk:Bakasuprman/Majorcontributors, you've edited my talk page more times than Hkelkar and subhash_bose combined.Bakaman Bakatalk 16:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Sentence in dispute
BhaiSaab, could you please let me know the sentences in dispute. A link would be enough. Thanks --Aminz 01:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
BhaiSaab please have a look at this:
This is Hklekar's source. --Aminz 02:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
The source is presenting the view of some medieval Indian Muslim scholars. --Aminz 02:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Arbitrator
I thought you were some random user and I was about to tell you not to respond to my statements on the case page but then I noticed that you're a part of Arbcom, lol. I have responded to one of your proposed decisions. BhaiSaab 22:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Your suggestion is valid and right. However, I would rather have users understand that I meant Israel as a political entity rather than the people of Israel, considering I've already made the statement. BhaiSaab 04:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, but be sure to check out these statements as well. BhaiSaab 05:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Where are the other arbitrators? Why are you the only one working? BhaiSaab 15:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- I am just the advance party. However I usually am the only one who uses the /Workshop page. I like it because it gives people a chance to give some feedback. Fred Bauder 18:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Warning
I have given you a warning like this before here. But you don't seem to get the point. Was there any need to make this very intelligent comment. This is your last warning. I will block you if you make one more remark like that on any talk page. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- As far as I know any encyclopedia or wiki is not considered as a reliable source. I will have check on that and let you know. And 2 wrongs do not make a right. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have confirmed with other admins and it looks like Encyclopedia of Islam is a reliable source. So that is my bad. I apologise. But my earlier warning still stays. It would do you well not to retort to every comment made by Hkelkar. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like our messages crossed. Yes. I was the one misinformed here. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. That is the root of the problem. Don't get upset. It's easy once you get the hang of it. I thought you would be the last person to get upset by things he does. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like our messages crossed. Yes. I was the one misinformed here. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have confirmed with other admins and it looks like Encyclopedia of Islam is a reliable source. So that is my bad. I apologise. But my earlier warning still stays. It would do you well not to retort to every comment made by Hkelkar. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
3RR and talk
See Talk:Antisemitism#My revert.
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ←Humus sapiens 05:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)