| Revision as of 21:45, 29 December 2004 editJudson (talk | contribs)590 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:14, 30 December 2004 edit undoDmn (talk | contribs)5,898 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. There should be a warning and then ban implemented for ''repeatedly'' listing articles which are unanimously voted keep. However, I do not think this would apply to Benjaminong. ]\<sup>]</sup> 18:26, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. There should be a warning and then ban implemented for ''repeatedly'' listing articles which are unanimously voted keep. However, I do not think this would apply to Benjaminong. ]\<sup>]</sup> 18:26, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - The 3 tenors are a genuine subject. -- ] 21:45, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' - The 3 tenors are a genuine subject. -- ] 21:45, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - Clearly a keeper ] '''/''' ] 00:14, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:14, 30 December 2004
The Three Tenors
Incoherent. BJ 13:15, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and send to cleanup. Definitely notable. --rbrwr 13:59, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Update: I have done quite a lot of cleanup work on this article since it was nominated. --rbrwr 16:31, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- You did an excellent job, thanks. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:35, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have removed the cleanup tag. --rbrwr 17:10, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- You did an excellent job, thanks. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:35, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Update: I have done quite a lot of cleanup work on this article since it was nominated. --rbrwr 16:31, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. Yes, it's a mess but it's marginally better than nothing. --fvw* 14:02, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
- Obvious keep. Why the time-wasting nomination in the first place? Dan100 14:52, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Cleanup needed, but valid subject. Keep. DJ Clayworth 14:59, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Strong keep, Weak cleanup. It could use cleanup, but many articles on more important subjects are in more urgent need of cleanup. This will do. It is far from incoherence. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 15:48, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and remove cleanup tag. Yeah, it's not the perfect article, but how many are? There are soooooo many needier Cleanup candidates going back months--this can wait for normal, organic improvements. Niteowlneils 16:06, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Good article. And looking back through the history, I can find no reason for listing this on VfD at any stage. The very first version might have been a deletable substub, but one minute later it was a good stub at least. Andrewa 20:02, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, it's how they've funded their retirement. Wyss 00:38, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep . Xtra 01:13, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Tuf-Kat 19:19, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Why was this nominated? If an article needs revision, that's not a criteria for VfD, IMO. 23skidoo 06:42, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, a world famous group consisting of, arguably, the three most famous tenors in the world. If the article was messy to begin with, it should have been sent to clenup not here.
- Keep. --BenM 15:25, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. And please stop deletion trolling. Mark Richards 21:46, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Delete nominator for bogus nomination - David Gerard 23:19, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. There should be a warning and then ban implemented for repeatedly listing articles which are unanimously voted keep. However, I do not think this would apply to Benjaminong. GRider\ 18:26, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - The 3 tenors are a genuine subject. -- Judson 21:45, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - Clearly a keeper Dmn / Դմն 00:14, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)