Revision as of 17:44, 13 October 2006 editAndyJones (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,498 edits Revert to last by me. I've already moved your question to Talk:Shakespearean authorship.← Previous edit |
Revision as of 22:33, 22 November 2006 edit undoBenJonson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,818 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the claimed orthodox perspectives''', many of which use ]s such as 'the orthodox perspective is...'. Quotable sources include Sam Schoenbaum's ''Shakespeare's Lives'' and ''Shakespeare: A Documentary Life'', Jonathan Bate's ''The Genius of Shakespeare'', Park Honan's ''Shakespeare: a Life'', Irvin Leigh Matus's ''Shakespeare in Fact'' and . |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the claimed orthodox perspectives''', many of which use ]s such as 'the orthodox perspective is...'. Quotable sources include Sam Schoenbaum's ''Shakespeare's Lives'' and ''Shakespeare: A Documentary Life'', Jonathan Bate's ''The Genius of Shakespeare'', Park Honan's ''Shakespeare: a Life'', Irvin Leigh Matus's ''Shakespeare in Fact'' and . |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the anti-Stratfordian arguments'''. Any properly published (see below) anti-Stratfordian text is acceptable. Avoid giving undue weight to not-yet established or minority theories: this too would follow . |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the anti-Stratfordian arguments'''. Any properly published (see below) anti-Stratfordian text is acceptable. Avoid giving undue weight to not-yet established or minority theories: this too would follow . |
|
#In accordance with the previous point, all ideas that are only supported by references to '''self-published books''' or '''websites by non-experts in theatre history''' need to be weeded out (not because they're necessarily wrong, but because is to avoid citations to such texts). |
|
#In accordance with the previous point, all ideas that are only supported by references to '''self-published books''' or '''websites by non-experts in relevant disciplines, including theatre history, intellectual history, Shakespearean studies, textual criticism, etc.''' need to be weeded out (not because they're necessarily wrong, but because is to avoid citations to such texts). |
|
#Many '''typical anti-Stratfordian arguments''' are still missing, ''e.g.'' the claim that Shakespeare was not eulogized when he died. |
|
#Many '''typical anti-Stratfordian arguments''' are still missing, ''e.g.'' the claim that Shakespeare was not eulogized when he died. |
|
#<s>The '''Baconian section needs trimming''' to make it a summary; the more specific points can then be removed to the ] article (as has been done for the Oxford and Marlowe sections)</s> Completed. |
|
#<s>The '''Baconian section needs trimming''' to make it a summary; the more specific points can then be removed to the ] article (as has been done for the Oxford and Marlowe sections)</s> Completed. |