Misplaced Pages

:Featured picture candidates/London ISS: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:53, 27 December 2004 editNeutrality (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,397 edits →[]← Previous edit Revision as of 00:19, 30 December 2004 edit undoDmn (talk | contribs)5,898 edits →[]Next edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Support''' - Though not perfect its interesting. I also don't like the blurred elements and scan lines, but it is still more real and direct than the Earthlights composite. - ] 11:20, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) *'''Support''' - Though not perfect its interesting. I also don't like the blurred elements and scan lines, but it is still more real and direct than the Earthlights composite. - ] 11:20, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. -] | ] 08:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) *'''Support'''. -] | ] 08:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''''. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC) *'''Oppose'''. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Nice ] '''/''' ] 00:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
<br style="clear:both;" /> <br style="clear:both;" />

Revision as of 00:19, 30 December 2004

London ISS

File:London iss c1.jpg
London from the ISS

This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.

  • Oppose. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ed g2s • talk 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. grendel|khan 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
  • Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. Enochlau 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose Sadly tooo blury ] 12:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose--ZayZayEM 00:51, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support -- it is striking how much this resembles fractured glass. --Elijah 05:50, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
  • Support - Though not perfect its interesting. I also don't like the blurred elements and scan lines, but it is still more real and direct than the Earthlights composite. - Solipsist 11:20, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. -Lommer | 08:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Neutrality 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Nice Dmn / Դմն 00:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)