| Revision as of 22:28, 24 November 2006 editFormeruser0910 (talk | contribs)5,788 editsm moved Talk:SS Empress of Australia to Talk:RMS Empress of Australia: Correct ship prefix← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:43, 24 November 2006 edit undoFormeruser0910 (talk | contribs)5,788 edits Copyright violationNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hello Bilbo B. | Hello Bilbo B. | ||
| A merger would be ok although this ship never actually went to sea with the name SS Terpitz. It was a name given to her during her construction period and was changed when she was ceded to great Britain. | A merger would be ok although this ship never actually went to sea with the name SS Terpitz. It was a name given to her during her construction period and was changed when she was ceded to great Britain. | ||
| == Copyright violation == | |||
| Much of the text of this article will have to be worked on as it is presently just copied from the article here: . Further, the images are tagged as being created by ], which seems suspicious, unless Stavros is somewhere around 100 years old, very well traveled, and an expert maritime draftsman. --] 23:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:43, 24 November 2006
Hello Bilbo B.
A merger would be ok although this ship never actually went to sea with the name SS Terpitz. It was a name given to her during her construction period and was changed when she was ceded to great Britain.
Copyright violation
Much of the text of this article will have to be worked on as it is presently just copied from the article here: . Further, the images are tagged as being created by User:Stavros1, which seems suspicious, unless Stavros is somewhere around 100 years old, very well traveled, and an expert maritime draftsman. --gbambino 23:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)