| Revision as of 01:43, 26 November 2006 view sourceSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits →LaRouche again: thank you← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:45, 26 November 2006 view source KyndFellow (talk | contribs)519 edits Filing requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
| // END TEMPLATE - copy text above (not this line) // --> | // END TEMPLATE - copy text above (not this line) // --> | ||
| <!-- ADD CASE BELOW, NEW REQUESTS AT THE TOP--> | <!-- ADD CASE BELOW, NEW REQUESTS AT THE TOP--> | ||
| <!-- // BEGIN TEMPLATE - copy text below (not this line) // | |||
| === Sex Tourism === | |||
| : '''Initiated by ''' ~~~ '''at''' ~~~~~ | |||
| ==== Involved parties ==== | |||
| *{{Userlinks|KyndFellow -- Mr. Knodel}} | |||
| *{{Userlinks|Edgarde}} | |||
| ; Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | |||
| '''Awaiting comfirmation''' -- provide diffs showing that the involved parties have been notified on their talk pages | |||
| ; Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | |||
| -- RFC introduced in talk page on October 31 October 2006 2006 | |||
| -- On 22 November 2006, advocate ] suggests mediation to resolved dispute, and editor ] disclines this proposal. | |||
| ==== Statement by ] ==== | |||
| ==== Statement by ]{write party's name here} ==== | |||
| : (Please limit your statement to 500 words. Overlong statements may be removed without warning by clerks or arbitrators and replaced by much shorter summaries. Remember to sign and date your statement.) | |||
| ==== Clerk notes ==== | |||
| : (This area is used for notes by non-recused clerks.) | |||
| ==== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0) ==== <br> | |||
| === Appeal of Prof02=== | === Appeal of Prof02=== | ||
| : '''Initiated by ''' ] ''' at the request of '''Prof02''' at''' 14:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC) | : '''Initiated by ''' ] ''' at the request of '''Prof02''' at''' 14:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 333: | Line 363: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| == Requests for clarification == | == Requests for clarification == | ||
Revision as of 02:45, 26 November 2006
Shortcut- ]
A request for Arbitration is the last step of dispute resolution. Before requesting Arbitration, please review other avenues you should take. If you do not follow any of these routes, it is highly likely that your request will be rejected. If all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the Arbitration Committee (ArbCom).
| Dispute resolution (Requests) |
|---|
| Tips |
| Content disputes |
| Conduct disputes |
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open cases| Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motions| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
The Arbitration Committee considers requests to open new cases and (exceptionally) to summarily review new evidence and update the findings and decisions of a previous case. Review is likely to be appropriate if later events indicate the original ruling on scope or enforcement was too limited and does not adequately address the situation, or if new evidence suggests the findings of fact were significantly in error.
The procedure for accepting requests is described in the Arbitration policy. If you are going to make a request here, you must be brief and cite supporting diffs. If your case is accepted for arbitration, the arbitrator or clerk will create an evidence page that you can use to provide more detail. New requests to the top, please. You are required to place a notice on the user talk page of each person against whom you lodge a complaint.
0/0/0/0 corresponds to Arbitrators' votes to accept/reject/recuse/other. Cases are usually opened at least 24 hours after four net accept votes are cast; that is, four more accept than reject votes. When a case is opened, a notice that includes a link to a newly created evidence page will be posted to each participant's talk page. See the Requests section of the arbitration policy page for details. "Recuse" means that an Arbitrator has excused themselves from a case because of a possible, or perceived, conflict of interest. Cases which have not met the acceptance criteria after 10 days will be removed from this page.
This is not a page for discussion, and Arbitrators or Clerks may summarily remove or refactor discussion without comment. Please do not open cases; only an Arbitrator or Clerk may do so.
See also
- Arbitration policy
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Past decisions
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/How to present a case - Recommended reading: An (unofficial) guide to presenting effective Arbitration cases.
- Arbitration enforcement - Any user can request help here if it involves the violation of an ArbCom decision
- Administrator enforcement requested (shortcut WP:RFAr/AER)
- Developer help needed
- Arbitration template
How to list cases
Under the Current requests section below:
- Click the "" tab on the right of the screen appearing above the section break line;
- Copy the full formatting template (text will be visible in edit mode), omitting the lines which say "BEGIN" and "END TEMPLATE";
- Paste template text where it says "ADD CASE BELOW";
- Follow instructions on comments (indented), and fill out the form;
- Remove the template comments (indented).
Note: Please do not remove or alter the hidden template
Current requests
Archives
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Completed requests
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Rejected requests (extremely sparse, selective, and unofficial)