| Revision as of 14:23, 9 July 2019 editTamsier (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,433 edits →MfD nomination of Portal:Traditional African religions← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:41, 15 July 2019 edit undoWinged Blades of Godric (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,041 edits Adding Discretionary Sanctions Notice (ipa) (Twinkle)Tag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| ] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] <small>] • (])</small> 13:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC) | ] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] <small>] • (])</small> 13:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ::Yo left me a red link. For your information, the actual deletion discussion is at ].] (]) 14:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC) | ::Yo left me a red link. For your information, the actual deletion discussion is at ].] (]) 14:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ==Important Notice== | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in ], ], and ]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ]] 15:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:41, 15 July 2019
SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.
 Archives |
Don't
indulge in these silly posturings with me and I don't give a damn about your warnings. Bye, ∯WBG 13:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- I notice you've deleted the warning I left on your talk page . Instead of arguing your case in a deletion review, you resulted to personal attack against another editor here, and I see here as well. What is wrong with you? If you continue with this silliness you will get yourself blocked.Tamsier (talk) 13:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Interracial marriage
Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached (see WP:STATUSQUO). Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- You seem to have a personal stake and POV in this article. I don't. You reverted my two edits twice ; and ignored the concerns raised in my edit summaries. I am surprised that you do not find any issues with the article especially the sections I've tagged and raised in my edit summaries - despite portraying yourself as an experienced editor. I do not have a dog in this fight, but articles must abide by our policies. Do not tell me about our policies. I am well familiar with them. And your BRD bolded text comes off as aggressive and patronising. Don't do that again. In any case, I have already raised the issues on the article's talk page and pinged you - see here. In order to centralise communication, please keep all your comments there, and not here on my talk page. This will help the community address the issues and decide what to do moving forward. Going by the article's history, it appears that this has been a problem for such a long time. We have policies in place and all articles must abide by them.Tamsier (talk) 11:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Traditional African religions sidebar
Hey I'm going to start a chat about freshening up the sidebar in the talk page for the sidebar, hop on and give me your thoughts.Mangokeylime (talk) 23:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- I've commented there with some suggestions.Tamsier (talk) 10:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Talk:2016 shooting of Dallas police officers
You replied to my edit and talked about redaction, but I neither made nor redacted the relevant edit. This is the second time you've made false accusations about me, the first being the accusation of vandalism here. Please interact with more care. VQuakr (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- I have left a comment there.Tamsier (talk) 08:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Portal:African Union
Hi T. Happy New Year. Thanks for the message. You did an amazing job on Portal:Pan-Africanism. On a side note, are you aware that they deleted Portal:African Union under a mass nomination and deletion ? Why would anyone in their right mind delete such an important and vast topic I will never know. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 06:53, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hey Sen, welcome back and happy new year. No I was not aware of that but you can file it at deletion review.Tamsier (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Serer royal houses has been nominated for discussion
Category:Serer royal houses, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 12:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:Serer people and Portal:Serer religion
Portal:Serer people and Portal:Serer religion, both of which are page which you created or substantially contributed to, have been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Serer portals and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Serer people and Portal:Serer religion during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:Traditional African religions
Portal:Traditional African religions, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Traditional African religions and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Traditional African religions during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yo left me a red link. For your information, the actual deletion discussion is at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Traditional African religions.Tamsier (talk) 14:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.