Talk:Barbara Engelking: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:18, 22 July 2019 editJayjg (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 editsm s← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:06, 23 July 2019 edit undoXx236 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,481 edits →Threads older than 1 week may be archived Next edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Does such overarchivisation make the discussion more readable?] (]) 08:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)		Does such overarchivisation make the discussion more readable?] (]) 08:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
	:Engelking is apparently disliked by various individuals or groups, and the talk page seems to constantly fill with comments that are, or could be considered, ] violations. It's therefore best to archive quickly, to avoid these issues. Also, please note it is not "threads older than 1 week", but actually "threads that have no response in over 1 week" that may be archived. No active or on-going discussion will be automatically archived. ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 13:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)		:Engelking is apparently disliked by various individuals or groups, and the talk page seems to constantly fill with comments that are, or could be considered, ] violations. It's therefore best to archive quickly, to avoid these issues. Also, please note it is not "threads older than 1 week", but actually "threads that have no response in over 1 week" that may be archived. No active or on-going discussion will be automatically archived. ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 13:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
			:May I ask what is your source of knowledge of the subject? Do you read Polish?
			:JT Gross and the Center led by BE want to reeducate Polish people. They aren't interested in facts, they accept contradictory sources.
			:Professor ] in his recent book describes BE as a psychologist (it's her MA subject, I would rather call her a sociologist). Musiał quotes also BE's statement, that she has psychological problem with the Holocaust. I respect openess of BE and her humanity, but there is a problem if she is neutral. A number of her media statements suggest she isn't. Musiał claims also that Center's researchers don't read German, so they use almost exlusively Polish language sources. Another question - do they read Yddish?
			:Dr Domański believes that BE and her team don't review their books by independent researchers. I don't know if the opinion has been rejected by the Center.
			:WWII survivor sues BE and Grabowski. JT Gross also has refused to correct his errors, so one had to sue him. Is it ''academic'' to use force to correct any error?
			:Domański and Gontarczyk have critiized the 2018 book and they write their books criticizing "Dalej jest noc". Let's wait.
			:So it's not ''like or dislike'' only. A Holocaust historian should read German and Yiddish and to evaluate his/her sources critically.
			] (]) 12:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:06, 23 July 2019

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

European history

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Jewish history

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Threads older than 1 week may be archived

Does such overarchivisation make the discussion more readable?Xx236 (talk) 08:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Engelking is apparently disliked by various individuals or groups, and the talk page seems to constantly fill with comments that are, or could be considered, WP:BLP violations. It's therefore best to archive quickly, to avoid these issues. Also, please note it is not "threads older than 1 week", but actually "threads that have no response in over 1 week" that may be archived. No active or on-going discussion will be automatically archived. Jayjg 13:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

May I ask what is your source of knowledge of the subject? Do you read Polish?

JT Gross and the Center led by BE want to reeducate Polish people. They aren't interested in facts, they accept contradictory sources.

Professor Bogdan Musiał in his recent book describes BE as a psychologist (it's her MA subject, I would rather call her a sociologist). Musiał quotes also BE's statement, that she has psychological problem with the Holocaust. I respect openess of BE and her humanity, but there is a problem if she is neutral. A number of her media statements suggest she isn't. Musiał claims also that Center's researchers don't read German, so they use almost exlusively Polish language sources. Another question - do they read Yddish?

Dr Domański believes that BE and her team don't review their books by independent researchers. I don't know if the opinion has been rejected by the Center.

WWII survivor sues BE and Grabowski. JT Gross also has refused to correct his errors, so one had to sue him. Is it academic to use force to correct any error?

Domański and Gontarczyk have critiized the 2018 book and they write their books criticizing "Dalej jest noc". Let's wait.

So it's not like or dislike only. A Holocaust historian should read German and Yiddish and to evaluate his/her sources critically.

Xx236 (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Categories: