| Revision as of 01:00, 24 July 2019 editXinbenlv (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,134 edits →Is there a way to query ClueBot score for any individual revisions?: new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:42, 24 July 2019 edit undoNaomiAmethyst (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors6,271 edits →Is there a way to query ClueBot score for any individual revisions?: Reply.Next edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| ](]) <sup>please notify me with {{]}} </sup> 01:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC) | ](]) <sup>please notify me with {{]}} </sup> 01:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
| :Unfortunately, not right now. There is an IRC feed of live evaluations, which you can use if you ingest it. See . The format is the same as the official live feed with ClueBot NG's annotations tacked on after the original feed line in this format: # Score # Reason # Status. Score is a number between 0 and 1, indicating the overall score of the revision. Reason is what criteria was the controlling one for reversion. Reverted is either "Not reverted" or "Reverted". -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 03:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:42, 24 July 2019
This user is NOT a humanThis is the combined talk page for ClueBot NG and ClueBot III. These users are automated computer programs and are not humans. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.
False positives and false negativesIf you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Frequently Asked Questions Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
The current status of ClueBot III is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
Template:Archive box collapsible
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Is there a way to query ClueBot score for any individual revisions?
Dear awesome ClueBot team,
Is there a way to query ClueBot score for any individual revisions? Just like ORES
The context is that we are trying to build a next generation Web App for editors to monitor revisions and flag them when vandalism occurs, which is this: WikiLoop Battlefield, we would like to see if we can integrate the score that ClueBotNG uses.
Thank you!
Xinbenlv(t) 01:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, not right now. There is an IRC feed of live evaluations, which you can use if you ingest it. See #wikipedia-en-cbngfeed on Freenode. The format is the same as the official live feed with ClueBot NG's annotations tacked on after the original feed line in this format: # Score # Reason # Status. Score is a number between 0 and 1, indicating the overall score of the revision. Reason is what criteria was the controlling one for reversion. Reverted is either "Not reverted" or "Reverted". -- Cobi 03:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)