| Revision as of 05:47, 29 November 2006 editMetsFan76 (talk | contribs)3,277 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:47, 29 November 2006 edit undoTariqabjotu (talk | contribs)Administrators36,354 edits →[]: expanding rationale (seeing as there might be a debate here)Next edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| **'''Comment''' Is this even legit? If so, then any religion except Judaism can be used for this template? Even better, I'm not Jewish so maybe I can link it to my user page. ] 05:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | **'''Comment''' Is this even legit? If so, then any religion except Judaism can be used for this template? Even better, I'm not Jewish so maybe I can link it to my user page. ] 05:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Big time speedy delete''' per ]. ''(]])'' 05:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Big time speedy delete''' per ]. ''(]])'' 05:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Um...''' no. -- ''']''' 05:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Um...''' no; this isn't neutral and we're ''really'' opening up a can of worms. Someone's going to put it on the ] article or ] article or something along those lines. If people want to find out whether a group or person or subject does not relate to Judaism (or any other faith), they should check out the appropriate article for that faith and then compare and contrast the ideas on their own. -- ''']''' 05:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - Some organizations and movements attempt to misrepresent Judaism's basic beliefs, therefore in certain articles this would be fully justified. Case in point: ]. Why such a hurry to delete? ←] <sup>]]</sup> 05:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' - Some organizations and movements attempt to misrepresent Judaism's basic beliefs, therefore in certain articles this would be fully justified. Case in point: ]. Why such a hurry to delete? ←] <sup>]]</sup> 05:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :* I'd go so far as to say this is the most qualified ] candidate I've ever seen. ''(]])'' 05:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | :* I'd go so far as to say this is the most qualified ] candidate I've ever seen. ''(]])'' 05:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:47, 29 November 2006
| < November 28 | November 30 > |
|---|
November 29
Template:NotJudaism
Speedy Delete Inflammatory and divisive. Recommend speedy delete. --inigmatus 05:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Unless someone can explain why we would use this template except to be divisive and to endorse a POV, I have to say delete. Heimstern Läufer 05:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete This is getting ridiculous!!! MetsFan76 05:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Is this even legit? If so, then any religion except Judaism can be used for this template? Even better, I'm not Jewish so maybe I can link it to my user page. MetsFan76 05:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Big time speedy delete per WP:NPOV. (→Netscott) 05:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Um... no; this isn't neutral and we're really opening up a can of worms. Someone's going to put it on the Cheese article or Ham article or something along those lines. If people want to find out whether a group or person or subject does not relate to Judaism (or any other faith), they should check out the appropriate article for that faith and then compare and contrast the ideas on their own. -- tariqabjotu 05:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Some organizations and movements attempt to misrepresent Judaism's basic beliefs, therefore in certain articles this would be fully justified. Case in point: Jews for Jesus. Why such a hurry to delete? ←Humus sapiens 05:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'd go so far as to say this is the most qualified T1 candidate I've ever seen. (→Netscott) 05:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- I cant believe this guy Humus wants to keep!!!! Anyone want to take a guess why? MetsFan76 05:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:DOND USA Models
Collection of mostly non-notable models. Has mostly redlinks, and has several links to articles that aren't notable. It seems a little absurd to have articles (and a template collecting) models who are on a television show with no speaking role. --Mikeblas 01:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:Nsn
As far as I can tell, this was a hack used before Magic Words were commonplace. Depreciated. --humblefool® 00:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:Namespace prefix of associated page
After tracking down and replacing this template's use of over 83,000 pages in the 'pedia (via various inclusions and substitutions), this depreciated page is finally ready to be deleted. --humblefool® 05:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)