Misplaced Pages

Architecture of India: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:04, 20 July 2019 editMandarax (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers388,282 edits Correct capitalizationTag: AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 07:12, 1 August 2019 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,407,730 editsm Alter: url, isbn, quote. Add: date, title, jstor. Removed URL that duplicated unique identifier. Converted bare reference to cite template. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:HeadbombNext edit →
Line 36: Line 36:


=== English Bond and building material === === English Bond and building material ===
While in contemporary Bronze age cultures mud bricks was the dominant building material, Indus Valley civilization preferred to use terracotta brick instead. Prominent feature of Harappan architecture was also the first use of ] any where in the world. This type of bonding utilized the alternate headers and stretchers which is stronger method of construction. clay was usually used as cementing material but where better strength was needed such as the drains, the lime and gypsum mortar was preferred instead. In architecture such as the ], Bitumen has been used for water proofing, Use of Bitumen has been attested as early as ] period, one of the earliest uses in the world as well.The remarkable vertical alignment of the building indicates the use of ] The bricks were produced in a standardized ratio of 4:2:1 and has been noted through out Indus Valley Civilization.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=uRMGDmdE9FkC&pg=PA139&dq=english+bond+indus+valley+civilization&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiU-6mhxpTjAhUOTY8KHT-9AC8Q6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=english%20bond%20indus%20valley%20civilization&f=false|title=Prehistory and Harappan Civilization|last=Pruthi|first=Raj|date=2004|publisher=APH Publishing|isbn=9788176485814|language=en}}</ref> While in contemporary Bronze age cultures mud bricks was the dominant building material, Indus Valley civilization preferred to use terracotta brick instead. Prominent feature of Harappan architecture was also the first use of ] any where in the world. This type of bonding utilized the alternate headers and stretchers which is stronger method of construction. clay was usually used as cementing material but where better strength was needed such as the drains, the lime and gypsum mortar was preferred instead. In architecture such as the ], Bitumen has been used for water proofing, Use of Bitumen has been attested as early as ] period, one of the earliest uses in the world as well.The remarkable vertical alignment of the building indicates the use of ] The bricks were produced in a standardized ratio of 4:2:1 and has been noted through out Indus Valley Civilization.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=uRMGDmdE9FkC&pg=PA139&dq=english+bond+indus+valley+civilization#v=onepage&q=english%20bond%20indus%20valley%20civilization&f=false|title=Prehistory and Harappan Civilization|last=Pruthi|first=Raj|date=2004|publisher=APH Publishing|isbn=9788176485814|language=en}}</ref>


=== '''Late Harappan period''' === === '''Late Harappan period''' ===




After collapse of mature harappan urban period, some cities still remained urban and inhabited. sites like ] in Gujarat, Kudwala(38.1 ha) in Cholistan and ] (20 Ha) in Maharashtra are considered urban. Daimabad (2000-1000 BC) developed a fortification wall with bastions in its jorwe culture period (1400-1000 BC) and had public buildings such as an elliptical temple, an apsidal temple and shows evidence of planning in the layout of rectangular houses and streets or lanes and planned streets. The area had rose to 50 hectares in with a population of 10,000 people. A 580 meter long protection wall dated 1500 BC was found at Bet Dwarka which was believed to be damaged and submerged following sea storm.<ref>U. Singh (2008), pp. 181, 223</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=KOJ8aT3xYPoC&pg=PA94&dq=daimabad+elliptical+temple&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjH98mts73iAhWB63MBHcqrCHQQ6AEILzAB#v=onepage&q=daimabad%20elliptical%20temple&f=false|title=The City and the Country in Early India: A Study of Malwa|last=Basant|first=P. K.|date=2012|publisher=Primus Books|isbn=9789380607153|language=en}}</ref> <gallery widths="200" heights="200"> After collapse of mature harappan urban period, some cities still remained urban and inhabited. sites like ] in Gujarat, Kudwala(38.1 ha) in Cholistan and ] (20 Ha) in Maharashtra are considered urban. Daimabad (2000-1000 BC) developed a fortification wall with bastions in its jorwe culture period (1400-1000 BC) and had public buildings such as an elliptical temple, an apsidal temple and shows evidence of planning in the layout of rectangular houses and streets or lanes and planned streets. The area had rose to 50 hectares in with a population of 10,000 people. A 580 meter long protection wall dated 1500 BC was found at Bet Dwarka which was believed to be damaged and submerged following sea storm.<ref>U. Singh (2008), pp. 181, 223</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=KOJ8aT3xYPoC&pg=PA94&dq=daimabad+elliptical+temple#v=onepage&q=daimabad%20elliptical%20temple&f=false|title=The City and the Country in Early India: A Study of Malwa|last=Basant|first=P. K.|date=2012|publisher=Primus Books|isbn=9789380607153|language=en}}</ref> <gallery widths="200" heights="200">
File:DHOLAVIRA SITE (36).jpg|Dholavira ruins File:DHOLAVIRA SITE (36).jpg|Dholavira ruins
File:DHOLAVIRA SITE (24).jpg|stepped reservoir File:DHOLAVIRA SITE (24).jpg|stepped reservoir
Line 57: Line 57:
'''fortification''' '''fortification'''


Archaeological excavations have revealed ] fortifications from the end of second millennium BC.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Fortified Cities of Ancient India: A Comparative Study|last=Schlingloff|first=Dieter|publisher=Anthem Press|year=2014|isbn=1783083492|location=|pages=67 According to GR Sharma's monograph, rampart was built and provided with brick revetment between 1025 and 955 BC}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian archaeology a review: 1957-58|last=Sharma|first=G. R|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=47-48 In the earliest Period, I, the defences consisted of a mud wall with a burnt brick revetment on the exterior, the latter being available to a height of 42 ft. 5 in. and comprising one hundred and fiftyfour courses of bricks (pl. LX). The first thirty courses from the bottom showed a batter of about 15 deg from the vertical and the upper courses 40 deg, the bricks being laid throughout in the English bond. Up to the first thirty courses the revetment was also covered by a 2- to 1/2-in. thick mud plaster. At a height of about 6 ft. from th bottom there were a number of holes, perhaps weep-holes, situated 6 ft. apart from each other. On the bases of the associated pottery , coins and terracottas the beginnings of the different periods of the defenses maybe dated as follows; Period I, 700 B.C, Period II, 500 B.C; Period III, 300 B.C, Period IV, 50 B.C; and Period V, A. D. 150}}</ref> Archaeological excavations have revealed ] fortifications from the end of second millennium BC.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Fortified Cities of Ancient India: A Comparative Study|last=Schlingloff|first=Dieter|publisher=Anthem Press|year=2014|isbn=978-1783083497|location=|pages=67 According to GR Sharma's monograph, rampart was built and provided with brick revetment between 1025 and 955 BC}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian archaeology a review: 1957-58|last=Sharma|first=G. R|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=47-48 In the earliest Period, I, the defences consisted of a mud wall with a burnt brick revetment on the exterior, the latter being available to a height of 42 ft. 5 in. and comprising one hundred and fiftyfour courses of bricks (pl. LX). The first thirty courses from the bottom showed a batter of about 15 deg from the vertical and the upper courses 40 deg, the bricks being laid throughout in the English bond. Up to the first thirty courses the revetment was also covered by a 2- to 1/2-in. thick mud plaster. At a height of about 6 ft. from th bottom there were a number of holes, perhaps weep-holes, situated 6 ft. apart from each other. On the bases of the associated pottery , coins and terracottas the beginnings of the different periods of the defenses maybe dated as follows; Period I, 700 B.C, Period II, 500 B.C; Period III, 300 B.C, Period IV, 50 B.C; and Period V, A. D. 150}}</ref>


'''Palace''' '''Palace'''
Line 63: Line 63:
Stone palace predating the Mauryan periods have been discovered from the ruins of Kausambi. The dressed stones of the palace were set in fine lime and coated with a thick layer of plaster, the entire architecture resembled a fortress with its own walls and towers. The palace had few rooms, each room was provided with three shelves and a central hall with steps leading to the tower. The architecture was constructed in three phases and is dated from 8th century BC to 2nd century BC. Discovery of this stone palace discredits the theory of foreign influence behind the rise of Indian stone architecture during ] or ] period. Stone palace predating the Mauryan periods have been discovered from the ruins of Kausambi. The dressed stones of the palace were set in fine lime and coated with a thick layer of plaster, the entire architecture resembled a fortress with its own walls and towers. The palace had few rooms, each room was provided with three shelves and a central hall with steps leading to the tower. The architecture was constructed in three phases and is dated from 8th century BC to 2nd century BC. Discovery of this stone palace discredits the theory of foreign influence behind the rise of Indian stone architecture during ] or ] period.


A technique of architecture applied here was using dressed stones as facing for a wall made of rubble core, this represents the apogee of indian architecture in ancient period.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A Review 1960-61|last=A.|first=Ghosh|publisher=Archaeological Survey of India|year=1961|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=33-35}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=JU2sCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA21&dq=kausambi+stone+palace&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0u_f-3LjiAhWIYo8KHf2OAc44ChDoAQhSMAk#v=onepage&q=kausambi%20stone%20palace&f=false|title=Cities in South Asia|last=Bates|first=Crispin|last2=Mio|first2=Minoru|date=2015-05-22|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9781317565130|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A Review 1961-62|last=A.|first=Ghosh|publisher=Archaeological Survey of India|year=1964|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=50-52}}</ref><gallery widths="200" heights="200" mode="packed" caption="Kausambi palace architecture technique applied in later periods"> A technique of architecture applied here was using dressed stones as facing for a wall made of rubble core, this represents the apogee of indian architecture in ancient period.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A Review 1960-61|last=A.|first=Ghosh|publisher=Archaeological Survey of India|year=1961|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=33–35}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=JU2sCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA21&dq=kausambi+stone+palace#v=onepage&q=kausambi%20stone%20palace&f=false|title=Cities in South Asia|last=Bates|first=Crispin|last2=Mio|first2=Minoru|date=2015-05-22|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9781317565130|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A Review 1961-62|last=A.|first=Ghosh|publisher=Archaeological Survey of India|year=1964|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=50–52}}</ref><gallery widths="200" heights="200" mode="packed" caption="Kausambi palace architecture technique applied in later periods">
File:Kausambi palace 6th century BC.png|Kausambi palace dressed stone wall facing 6th century BC File:Kausambi palace 6th century BC.png|Kausambi palace dressed stone wall facing 6th century BC
File:Kausambi palace 6th century BC 2.png|Kausambi palace dressed stone wall facing 6th century BC, phase II another view File:Kausambi palace 6th century BC 2.png|Kausambi palace dressed stone wall facing 6th century BC, phase II another view
Line 73: Line 73:
'''Ghositarama monastery''' '''Ghositarama monastery'''


Buddhist scripture attributes this very old monastic site to the time of the Buddha which has been backed by archaeology, founded by a banker named Ghosita. The site has been located near Kosambi and identified by inscriptions. Archaeology suggests continuous occupation down to the sixth century when it was likely destroyed in the Hun invasion. Xuanzang found it an unoccupied ruin.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=zQmsAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA229&dq=Ghositarama+monastery&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixk66WvL3iAhWC6nMBHSw_DAwQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=Ghositarama%20monastery&f=false|title=Along the Path: The Meditator's Companion to the Buddha's Land|last=Goldberg|first=Kory|last2=Decary|first2=Michelle|date=2012-06-26|publisher=Pariyatti|isbn=9781928706564|language=en}}</ref> Buddhist scripture attributes this very old monastic site to the time of the Buddha which has been backed by archaeology, founded by a banker named Ghosita. The site has been located near Kosambi and identified by inscriptions. Archaeology suggests continuous occupation down to the sixth century when it was likely destroyed in the Hun invasion. Xuanzang found it an unoccupied ruin.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=zQmsAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA229&dq=Ghositarama+monastery#v=onepage&q=Ghositarama%20monastery&f=false|title=Along the Path: The Meditator's Companion to the Buddha's Land|last=Goldberg|first=Kory|last2=Decary|first2=Michelle|date=2012-06-26|publisher=Pariyatti|isbn=9781928706564|language=en}}</ref>


===Mahajanapadas=== ===Mahajanapadas===
Line 122: Line 122:
'''temples''' '''temples'''


elliptical Hindu temples with ] from Nagari, ] and ] near ] have been dated to 4th century BC or 350-300 BC.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Khare|first=M. D.|date=1975|title=THE HELIODORUS PILLAR—A FRESH APPRAISAL, BY JOHN IRWIN ( AARP—ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY RESEARCH PAPERS—DECEMBER 1974 ) A REJOINDER|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44138838|journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress|volume=36|pages=92–97|issn=2249-1937}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.108207|title=Gupta Art Vol.ii|last=Agrawala|first=Vasudeva S.|date=1977}}</ref>. elliptical Hindu temples with ] from Nagari, ] and ] near ] have been dated to 4th century BC or 350-300 BC.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Khare|first=M. D.|date=1975|title=THE HELIODORUS PILLAR—A FRESH APPRAISAL, BY JOHN IRWIN ( AARP—ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY RESEARCH PAPERS—DECEMBER 1974 ) A REJOINDER|journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress|volume=36|pages=92–97|issn=2249-1937|jstor=44138838}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.108207|title=Gupta Art Vol.ii|last=Agrawala|first=Vasudeva S.|date=1977}}</ref>.
==Classical period (320 BCE–550 CE)== ==Classical period (320 BCE–550 CE)==
===Monumental stone architecture=== ===Monumental stone architecture===
Line 256: Line 256:
Archaeological excavation conducted by ] (ASI) at ] revealed a palace with its foundations going back to 8th century BCE until 2nd century CE; and built in six phases. The last phase dated to 1st - 2nd century CE, featured an extensive structure which was divided into three blocks and enclosed two galleries. There was a central hall in the central block and presumably used as an audience hall surrounded by rooms which served as a residential place for the ruler. The entire structure was constructed using bricks and stones and two layers of lime were plastered on it. The palace had a vast network of underground chambers also called ] by Kautilya in his Arthashastra,<ref>{{Cite book|title=Age Of The Nandas And Mauryas|last=Shastri|first=K.A|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=339}}</ref> and the superstructure and the galleries were made on the principle of true arch. The four-centered pointed arch was used to span narrow passageways and segmental arch for wider areas. The superstructure of the central and eastern block was examined to have formed part of a dome that adorned the building. The entire galleries and superstructure were found collapsed under 5 cm thick layer of ash which indicates destruction of the palace through conflagration.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A review 1961-62|last=Gosh|first=A.|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=1964|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=50–52}}</ref> Archaeological excavation conducted by ] (ASI) at ] revealed a palace with its foundations going back to 8th century BCE until 2nd century CE; and built in six phases. The last phase dated to 1st - 2nd century CE, featured an extensive structure which was divided into three blocks and enclosed two galleries. There was a central hall in the central block and presumably used as an audience hall surrounded by rooms which served as a residential place for the ruler. The entire structure was constructed using bricks and stones and two layers of lime were plastered on it. The palace had a vast network of underground chambers also called ] by Kautilya in his Arthashastra,<ref>{{Cite book|title=Age Of The Nandas And Mauryas|last=Shastri|first=K.A|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=339}}</ref> and the superstructure and the galleries were made on the principle of true arch. The four-centered pointed arch was used to span narrow passageways and segmental arch for wider areas. The superstructure of the central and eastern block was examined to have formed part of a dome that adorned the building. The entire galleries and superstructure were found collapsed under 5 cm thick layer of ash which indicates destruction of the palace through conflagration.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A review 1961-62|last=Gosh|first=A.|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=1964|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=50–52}}</ref>


A palace architecture has also been uncovered at ].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=4gBSWyLTSzkC&pg=PA18&dq=nagarjunakonda+palace&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFkeaTpbziAhURiXAKHTypDXQQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=nagarjunakonda%20palace&f=false|title=Nagarjunakonda A Cultural Study|last=Murthy|first=K. Krishna|date=1977|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|language=en}}</ref><gallery widths="200" heights="200"> A palace architecture has also been uncovered at ].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=4gBSWyLTSzkC&pg=PA18&dq=nagarjunakonda+palace#v=onepage&q=nagarjunakonda%20palace&f=false|title=Nagarjunakonda A Cultural Study|last=Murthy|first=K. Krishna|date=1977|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|language=en}}</ref><gallery widths="200" heights="200">
File:Four centered pointed arch, Kausambi.png|] 1st-2nd century AD, Kausambi Palace File:Four centered pointed arch, Kausambi.png|] 1st-2nd century AD, Kausambi Palace
File:Kausambi Gothic arches 1st-2nd century AD.png|Kausambi palace vaulted underground chambers File:Kausambi Gothic arches 1st-2nd century AD.png|Kausambi palace vaulted underground chambers
Line 264: Line 264:


=== Theater and stadium === === Theater and stadium ===
] constructed a stadium and a theater at ] in the 2nd century AD. The theater has a small quadrangular open area enclosed on all four sides by stepped stands which are made of bricks and cladded with limestone <ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=SyxOHOCVcVkC&pg=PA237&lpg=PA237&dq=Nagarjunakonda+AMPHITHEATRE&source=bl&ots=j9r2fH4Uqv&sig=UXZzVedngVlDsNfpR31kYAMniKw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjvrr6jt6PfAhXML48KHToMAFoQ6AEwEXoECAUQAQ#v=onepage&q=Nagarjunakonda%20AMPHITHEATRE&f=false|title=History of Indian Theatre|last=Varadpande|first=Manohar Laxman|date=1987|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=9788170172215|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=JYuJWxLv-U0C&pg=PA91&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false|title=Ancient Indian And Indo-Greek Theatre|last=Varadpande|first=M. L.|date=1981|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=9788170171478|language=en}}</ref>. ] constructed a stadium and a theater at ] in the 2nd century AD. The theater has a small quadrangular open area enclosed on all four sides by stepped stands which are made of bricks and cladded with limestone <ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=SyxOHOCVcVkC&pg=PA237&lpg=PA237&dq=Nagarjunakonda+AMPHITHEATRE#v=onepage&q=Nagarjunakonda%20AMPHITHEATRE&f=false|title=History of Indian Theatre|last=Varadpande|first=Manohar Laxman|date=1987|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=9788170172215|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=JYuJWxLv-U0C&pg=PA91#v=onepage&q&f=false|title=Ancient Indian And Indo-Greek Theatre|last=Varadpande|first=M. L.|date=1981|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=9788170171478|language=en}}</ref>.


An oblong shaped stadium dating form the same era consisted of an arena which was enclosed on all four sides by flight of steps with each step measuring two feet wide and a pavilion which was situated on the west end. At the top of the arena there was a en eleven feet wide platform. The area of arena was 309 X 259 feet and 15 feet deep. Entire construction was done using burnt brick. An oblong shaped stadium dating form the same era consisted of an arena which was enclosed on all four sides by flight of steps with each step measuring two feet wide and a pavilion which was situated on the west end. At the top of the arena there was a en eleven feet wide platform. The area of arena was 309 X 259 feet and 15 feet deep. Entire construction was done using burnt brick.
Line 281: Line 281:
=== Fortification === === Fortification ===
] ]
Nalrajar Garh fortification wall ruins dating back to 5th century AD are probably the only standing fortification ruins from ] which are located in a dense jungle in North Bengal near Indo-Bhutan border. A prominent feature of its fortification walls are two parabolic arches.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian archaeology: A review 1966-67|last=M. N|first=Deshpande|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=1975|isbn=|location=Calcutta|pages=45-46}}</ref> Many fortified cities like Nalrajar Garh, ] had risen in ] owing to trade activities with south eastern China. Nalrajar Garh fortification wall ruins dating back to 5th century AD are probably the only standing fortification ruins from ] which are located in a dense jungle in North Bengal near Indo-Bhutan border. A prominent feature of its fortification walls are two parabolic arches.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian archaeology: A review 1966-67|last=M. N|first=Deshpande|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=1975|isbn=|location=Calcutta|pages=45–46}}</ref> Many fortified cities like Nalrajar Garh, ] had risen in ] owing to trade activities with south eastern China.


] or Pulakeshi fort from ] era date back to the 6th century AD<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/143024/11/11_chapter%204-1.pdf|title=EARLY FORTIFICATION: AIHOLE, BADAMI, PATTADAKAL, MAHAKUTA AND ALAMPUR|last=|first=|date=|website=|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=}}</ref> ] or Pulakeshi fort from ] era date back to the 6th century AD<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/143024/11/11_chapter%204-1.pdf|title=EARLY FORTIFICATION: AIHOLE, BADAMI, PATTADAKAL, MAHAKUTA AND ALAMPUR|last=|first=|date=|website=|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=}}</ref>
Line 517: Line 517:
In recent times there has been a movement of population from rural areas to urban centres of industry, leading to price rise in property in various cities of India.<ref name=rjadhav1>See Raj Jadhav, p. 11 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Urban housing in India balances space constrictions and is aimed to serve the working class.<ref name=Gast77>Gast, 77</ref> Growing awareness of ecology has influenced architecture in India during modern times.<ref name=Gast119>Gast, 119</ref> In recent times there has been a movement of population from rural areas to urban centres of industry, leading to price rise in property in various cities of India.<ref name=rjadhav1>See Raj Jadhav, p. 11 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Urban housing in India balances space constrictions and is aimed to serve the working class.<ref name=Gast77>Gast, 77</ref> Growing awareness of ecology has influenced architecture in India during modern times.<ref name=Gast119>Gast, 119</ref>
] at Delhi, designed by ], and completed in 1972, was considered one of the finest examples of ] architecture in India.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.archdaily.com/874154/the-demolition-of-delhis-hall-of-nations-reveals-indias-broken-attitude-to-architectural-heritage|title=The Demolition of Delhi's Hall of Nations Reveals India's Broken Attitude to Architectural Heritage|last=;Langar|first=Suneet Zishan|date=2017-06-23|website=ArchDaily|language=en-US|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> However, despite several protests, it was demolished in 2017. It's demolition was considered a tragedy among the architectural community.]] ] at Delhi, designed by ], and completed in 1972, was considered one of the finest examples of ] architecture in India.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.archdaily.com/874154/the-demolition-of-delhis-hall-of-nations-reveals-indias-broken-attitude-to-architectural-heritage|title=The Demolition of Delhi's Hall of Nations Reveals India's Broken Attitude to Architectural Heritage|last=;Langar|first=Suneet Zishan|date=2017-06-23|website=ArchDaily|language=en-US|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> However, despite several protests, it was demolished in 2017. It's demolition was considered a tragedy among the architectural community.]]
Climate responsive architecture has long been a feature of India's architecture but has been losing its significance as of late.<ref name="rjadhav2" /> Indian architecture reflects its various socio-cultural sensibilities which vary from region to region.<ref name="rjadhav2">See Raj Jadhav, 13 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Certain areas are traditionally held to be belonging to women.<ref name="rjadhav2" /> Villages in India have features such as courtyards, loggias, terraces and balconies.<ref name="Gast77" /> ], ], and ]—of Indian origin—highlight the assimilation of Indian textiles in global interior design.<ref name="eb-savage">Savage 2008</ref> ]s, which are skylights-cum-ventilators, are a common feature in Indian homes, especially in ].<ref name="ref10zayiq">{{Citation | title=India remembered | author=Thomas George Percival Spear|authorlink = Percival Spear|author2 = Margaret Spear | publisher=Orient Longman, 1981 | isbn=978-0-86131-265-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6vEtAAAAMAAJ | quote=''... The bungalow was a typical north Indian one, with a large central room lit only by skylights (roshandans) and a number of others opening out from them ...''| year=1981}}</ref><ref name="ref25xegoc">{{Citation | title=Mansions at dusk: the havelis of old Delhi | author=Pavan K. Varma, Sondeep Shankar | publisher=Spantech Publishers, 1992 | isbn=978-81-85215-14-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jCBuAAAAMAAJ | quote=''... Thirdly, while obviating direct sunlight, it had to allow some light and air to enter through overhead roshandans ...''| year=1992 }}</ref> Climate responsive architecture has long been a feature of India's architecture but has been losing its significance as of late.<ref name="rjadhav2" /> Indian architecture reflects its various socio-cultural sensibilities which vary from region to region.<ref name="rjadhav2">See Raj Jadhav, 13 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Certain areas are traditionally held to be belonging to women.<ref name="rjadhav2" /> Villages in India have features such as courtyards, loggias, terraces and balconies.<ref name="Gast77" /> ], ], and ]—of Indian origin—highlight the assimilation of Indian textiles in global interior design.<ref name="eb-savage">Savage 2008</ref> ]s, which are skylights-cum-ventilators, are a common feature in Indian homes, especially in ].<ref name="ref10zayiq">{{Citation | title=India remembered | author=Thomas George Percival Spear|authorlink = Percival Spear|author2 = Margaret Spear | publisher=Orient Longman, 1981 | isbn=978-0-86131-265-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6vEtAAAAMAAJ | quote=... The bungalow was a typical north Indian one, with a large central room lit only by skylights (roshandans) and a number of others opening out from them ...| year=1981}}</ref><ref name="ref25xegoc">{{Citation | title=Mansions at dusk: the havelis of old Delhi | author=Pavan K. Varma, Sondeep Shankar | publisher=Spantech Publishers, 1992 | isbn=978-81-85215-14-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jCBuAAAAMAAJ | quote=... Thirdly, while obviating direct sunlight, it had to allow some light and air to enter through overhead roshandans ...| year=1992 }}</ref>


=== 20th century === === 20th century ===
Line 537: Line 537:
File:Sripuram Temple Full View.jpg|] at ] is gilded with 1500&nbsp;kg of pure gold. File:Sripuram Temple Full View.jpg|] at ] is gilded with 1500&nbsp;kg of pure gold.
File:Dakshineswar.jpg|] is famous for its association with ]. File:Dakshineswar.jpg|] is famous for its association with ].
File:Palitana.jpg|] temples on Shantrunjaya hill which has more than 900 temples.<ref></ref> File:Palitana.jpg|] temples on Shantrunjaya hill which has more than 900 temples.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/JM-world---s-only-mountain-that-has-more-than-900-temples-4225137-PHO.html |title = World's only mountain that has more than 900 temples|date = 3 April 2013}}</ref>
File:Delwada.jpg|] are famous for their use of ] and intricate marble carvings. File:Delwada.jpg|] are famous for their use of ] and intricate marble carvings.
File:A Buddhist temple at Sarnath.jpg|Maha-Bodhi Mulagandhakuti Buddhist Temple at ]. File:A Buddhist temple at Sarnath.jpg|Maha-Bodhi Mulagandhakuti Buddhist Temple at ].

Revision as of 07:12, 1 August 2019

This article needs attention from an expert in Architecture. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. WikiProject Architecture may be able to help recruit an expert. (July 2018)

The Taj Mahal, the most famous building of Mughal architecture in India.
Srirangam in Tamil Nadu is largest temple complex in India.
Bhimakali temple, built in Kath-Kuni style of architecture.
Part of a series on the
Culture of India
Culture of India
Society
Arts and literature
Others
Symbols
Organizations

The architecture of India is rooted in its history, culture and religion. Indian architecture progressed with time and assimilated the many influences that came as a result of India's global discourse with other regions of the world throughout its two millennia-old past. The architectural methods practiced in India are a result of examination and implementation of its established building traditions and outside cultural interactions. Among a number of architectural styles and traditions, the contrasting Hindu temple architecture and Indo-Islamic architecture are the best known. Both of these, but especially the former, have a number of regional styles within them.

Hindu temple architecture is mainly divided into Dravidian and Nagara styles. Dravidian architecture flourished during the rule of the Chola, Chera, and Pandyan empires, as well as the Vijayanagara Empire.

The first major Islamic kingdom in India was the Delhi Sultanate, which led to the development of Indo-Islamic architecture, combining Indian and Islamic features. The rule of the Mughal Empire, when Mughal architecture evolved, is regarded as the zenith of Indo-Islamic architecture, with the Taj Mahal being the high point of their contribution.

During the British colonial period, European styles including neoclassical, gothic revival, and baroque became prevalent across India. The amalgamation of Indo-Islamic and European styles led to a new style, known as the Indo-Saracenic style. After independence, modernist ideas spread among Indian architects as a way of progressing from the colonial culture. Le Corbusier, who designed the city of Chandigarh influenced a generation of architects towards modernism in the 20th century. The economic reforms of 1991 further bolstered the urban architecture of India as the country became more integrated with the world's economy. Traditional Vastu Shastra remains influential in India's architecture during the contemporary era.

Bronze age period (3300 BCE–1300 BCE)

Planning of Indus valley civilization citiesLayout of Dholavirafortification of Kalibangan with square bastions and fort walls sorrounding the city

The Indus Valley Civilization (3300 BCE–1300 BCE) covered a large area around the Indus River basin and beyond. In its mature phase, from c. 2600–1900 BCE, it produced several cities marked by great uniformity within and between sites, including Harappa, Lothal, and the UNESCO World Heritage Site Mohenjo-daro. The civic and town planning and engineering aspects of these are remarkable, but the design of the buildings is "of a startling utilitarian character". There are granaries, drains, water-courses and tanks, but neither palaces nor temples have been identified, though cities have a central raised and fortified "citadel". Mohenjo-daro has wells which may be the predecessors of the stepwell. As many as 700 wells have been discovered in just one section of the city, leading scholars to believe that 'cylindrical brick lined wells' were invented by the Indus Valley Civilization.

The architectural decoration is extremely minimal, though there are "narrow pointed niches" inside some buildings. Most of the art found is in miniature forms like seals, and mainly in terracotta, but there are a very few larger sculptures of figures. In most sites fired mud-brick (not sun-baked as in Mesopotamia) is used exclusively as the building material, but a few such as Dholavira are in stone. Most houses have two stories, and very uniform sizes and plans. The large cities declined relatively quickly, for unknown reasons, leaving a less sophisticated village culture behind.

File:Kalibangan ruins2.png
Kalibangan fired brick drain laid on a mud brick construction, early Harappan period

Early Harappan phase

Although urban phase of Harappa has been dated to 2600 BC, excavation at Kalibangan from the early or proto Harappan period already shows an urban development with fortification, grid layout of the city and drain system. The settlement consisted of a fortified city mostly made of mud brick architecture but characterized by an appearance of fired bricks around 3000 BC which was used to line the drains of the city.

English Bond and building material

While in contemporary Bronze age cultures mud bricks was the dominant building material, Indus Valley civilization preferred to use terracotta brick instead. Prominent feature of Harappan architecture was also the first use of English bond any where in the world. This type of bonding utilized the alternate headers and stretchers which is stronger method of construction. clay was usually used as cementing material but where better strength was needed such as the drains, the lime and gypsum mortar was preferred instead. In architecture such as the Great Bath, Bitumen has been used for water proofing, Use of Bitumen has been attested as early as Mehrgarh period, one of the earliest uses in the world as well.The remarkable vertical alignment of the building indicates the use of Plumb line The bricks were produced in a standardized ratio of 4:2:1 and has been noted through out Indus Valley Civilization.

Late Harappan period

After collapse of mature harappan urban period, some cities still remained urban and inhabited. sites like Bet Dwarka in Gujarat, Kudwala(38.1 ha) in Cholistan and Daimabad (20 Ha) in Maharashtra are considered urban. Daimabad (2000-1000 BC) developed a fortification wall with bastions in its jorwe culture period (1400-1000 BC) and had public buildings such as an elliptical temple, an apsidal temple and shows evidence of planning in the layout of rectangular houses and streets or lanes and planned streets. The area had rose to 50 hectares in with a population of 10,000 people. A 580 meter long protection wall dated 1500 BC was found at Bet Dwarka which was believed to be damaged and submerged following sea storm.

  • Dholavira ruins Dholavira ruins
  • stepped reservoir stepped reservoir
  • North Gate North Gate
  • drainage system drainage system
  • The dock, with a canal opening to allow water to flow into the river, thereby maintaining a stable water level. The dock, with a canal opening to allow water to flow into the river, thereby maintaining a stable water level.
  • Lothal - bathroom structure Lothal - bathroom structure
  • Archaeological feature Archaeological feature

Ancient period (1025 BCE–320 BCE)

File:Kaushambi Jain Ruins.jpg
Kausambi fort walls from Period I with burnt brick revetment, 1025-700 BC, PGW culture. Weeping holes at the base can be clearly observed.

Kausambi

File:Ahichchhatra.png
Ahichchhatra fortification with square bastions

fortification

Archaeological excavations have revealed Kausambi fortifications from the end of second millennium BC.

Palace

Stone palace predating the Mauryan periods have been discovered from the ruins of Kausambi. The dressed stones of the palace were set in fine lime and coated with a thick layer of plaster, the entire architecture resembled a fortress with its own walls and towers. The palace had few rooms, each room was provided with three shelves and a central hall with steps leading to the tower. The architecture was constructed in three phases and is dated from 8th century BC to 2nd century BC. Discovery of this stone palace discredits the theory of foreign influence behind the rise of Indian stone architecture during Ashokan or mauryan period.

A technique of architecture applied here was using dressed stones as facing for a wall made of rubble core, this represents the apogee of indian architecture in ancient period.

Ghoshitaram monastery in Kosambi dating back to 6th century BC

Ghositarama monastery

Buddhist scripture attributes this very old monastic site to the time of the Buddha which has been backed by archaeology, founded by a banker named Ghosita. The site has been located near Kosambi and identified by inscriptions. Archaeology suggests continuous occupation down to the sixth century when it was likely destroyed in the Hun invasion. Xuanzang found it an unoccupied ruin.

Mahajanapadas

Conjectural reconstruction of the main gate of Kushinagar c. 500 BCE adapted from a relief at Sanchi.
City of Kushinagar in the 5th century BCE according to a 1st century BCE frieze in Sanchi Stupa 1 Southern Gate.
Rajgir, old city walls 6th century BCE

From the time of the Mahajanapadas (600 BCE–320 BCE), walled and moated cities with large gates and multi-storied buildings which consistently used arched windows and doors and made an intense use of wooden architecture, are important features of the architecture during this period. The reliefs of Sanchi, dated to the 1st centuries BCE–CE, show cities such as Kushinagar or Rajagriha as splendid walled cities during the time of the Buddha (6th century BCE), as in the Royal cortege leaving Rajagriha or War over the Buddha's relics. These views of ancient Indian cities have been relied on for the understanding of ancient Indian urban architecture. Archaeologically, this period corresponds in part to the Northern Black Polished Ware culture. Geopolitically, the Achaemenid Empire started to occupy the northwestern part of the subcontinent from c, 518 BCE.

Jetavana of Sravasti, Sanchi Stupa 1, Northern Gateway.

Various types of individual housing of the time of the Buddha (c. 563/480 or c. 483/400 BCE), resembling huts with chaitya-decorated doors, are also described in the reliefs of Sanchi. Particularly, the Jetavana at Sravasti, shows the three favourite residences of the Buddha: the Gandhakuti, the Kosambakuti and the Karorikuti, with the throne of the Buddha in the front of each. The Jetavana garden was presented to the Buddha by the rich banker Anathapindika, who purchased it for as many gold pieces as would cover the surface of the ground. Hence, the foreground of the relief is shown covered with ancient Indian coins (karshapanas), just as it is in the similar relief at Bharhut. Although the reliefs of Sanchi are dated to the 1st centuries BCE–CE, portraying scene taking place during the time of the Buddha, four centuries before, they are considered an important indication of building traditions in these early times.

File:Nanda voussoir.pngNanda period voussoir with mauryan polishFile:Nanda voussoir 2.pngmason's marks of archaic Brahmi

Pataliputra Voussoir Arch

A granite stone fragment of an arch discovered by K. P. Jayaswal from Kumhrar, Pataliputra has been analysed as a pre Mauryan Nanda period keystone fragment of a trefoil arch of gateway with mason's marks of three archaic Brahmi letters inscribed on it which probably decorated a Torana. The wedge shaped stone with indentation has mauryan polish on two sides and was suspended vertically.

Religious architecture

Further information: Buddhist architecture
Buddhist caves

During the time of the Buddha (c. 563/480 or c. 483/400 BCE), Buddhist monks were also in the habit of using natural caves, such as the Saptaparni Cave, southwest from Rajgir, Bihar. Many believe it to be the site in which Buddha spent some time before his death, and where the first Buddhist council was held after the Buddha died (paranirvana). The Buddha himself had also used the Indrasala Cave for meditation, starting a tradition of using caves, natural or man-made, as religious retreats, that would last for over a millennium.

Jivakarama vihara monastery. Oblong communal hall (remains), 6th century BCE.
Monasteries

The first monasteries, such as the Jivakarama vihara and Ghositarama monastery in Rajgir and Kausambi respectively, were built from the time of the Buddha, in the 6th or 5th centuries BCE. The initial Jivakarama monastery was formed of two long parallel and oblong halls, large dormitories where the monks could eat and sleep, in conformity with the original regulations of the samgha, without any private cells. Other halls were then constructed, mostly long, oblong building as well, which remind of the construction of several of the Barabar caves. The Buddha is said to have been treated once in the monastery, after having been injured by Devadatta.

Stupas at Piprahwa are some of the earliest surviving stupas.
Stupas

Religious buildings in the form of the Buddhist stupa, a dome shaped monument, started to be used in India as commemorative monuments associated with storing sacred relics of the Buddha. The relics of the Buddha were spread between eight stupas, in Rajagriha, Vaishali, Kapilavastu, Allakappa, Ramagrama, Pava, Kushinagar, and Vethapida. The Piprahwa stupa also seems to have been one of the first to be built. Guard rails—consisting of posts, crossbars, and a coping—became a feature of safety surrounding a stupa. The Buddha had left instructions about how to pay hommage to the stupas: "And whoever lays wreaths or puts sweet perfumes and colours there with a devout heart, will reap benefits for a long time". This practice would lead to the decoration of the stupas with stone sculptures of flower garlands in the Classical period.

temples

elliptical Hindu temples with mandapa from Nagari, Chittorgarh and Vidisha near Heliodorus pillar have been dated to 4th century BC or 350-300 BC..

Classical period (320 BCE–550 CE)

Monumental stone architecture

Further information: Pataliputra, Pillars of Ashoka, and Mauryan polish
The Pataliputra capital, discovered at the Bulandi Bagh site of Pataliputra, c. 4th–3rd BCE.

The next wave of building, appears with the start of the Classical period (320 BCE–550 CE) and the rise of the Mauryan Empire. The capital city of Pataliputra was an urban marvel described by the Greek ambassador Megasthenes. Remains of monumental stone architecture can be seen through numerous artifacts recovered from Pataliputra, such as the Pataliputra capital. This cross-fertilization between different art streams converging on the subcontinent produced new forms that, while retaining the essence of the past, succeeded in the integrating selected elements of the new influences.

Ashoka pillar at Vaishali, 250 BCE.

The Indian emperor Ashoka (rule: 273–232 BCE) established the Pillars of Ashoka throughout his realm, generally next to Buddhist stupas. According to Buddhist tradition, Ashoka recovered the relics of the Buddha from the earlier stupas (except from the Ramagrama stupa), and erected 84.000 stupas to distribute the relics across India. In effect, many stupas are thought to date originally from the time of Ashoka, such as Sanchi or Kesariya, where he also erected pillars with his inscriptions, and possibly Bharhut, Amaravati or Dharmarajika in Gandhara.

Ashoka also built the initial Mahabodhi temple in Bodh Gaya around the Bodhi tree, including masterpieces such as the Diamond throne ("Vajrasana"). He is also said to have established a chain of hospitals throughout the Mauryan empire by 230 BCE. One of the edicts of Ashoka reads: "Everywhere King Piyadasi (Ashoka) erected two kinds of hospitals, hospitals for people and hospitals for animals. Where there were no healing herbs for people and animals, he ordered that they be bought and planted." Indian art and culture has absorbed extraneous impacts by varying degrees and is much richer for this exposure.

Fortified cities with stūpas, viharas, and temples were constructed during the Maurya empire (c. 321–185 BCE). Architectural creations of the Mauryan period, such as the city of Pataliputra, the Pillars of Ashoka, are outstanding in their achievements, and often compare favourably with the rest of the world at that time. Commenting on Mauryan sculpture, John Marshall once wrote about the "extraordinary precision and accuracy which characterizes all Mauryan works, and which has never, we venture to say, been surpassed even by the finest workmanship on Athenian buildings".

The famous carved door of Lomas Rishi, one of the Barabar Caves, dated to approximately 250 BCE, displaying the first known Maurya reliefs.
The quasi-perfect walls of the Barabar Caves were dug into the hard rock and polished to a mirror effect c. 250 BCE, date of the inscriptions of Ashoka.
Gothic vault plan of Sitamarhi Cave 3rd century BCBarrel apsidal vault plan of Lomas Rishi Cave 3rd century BC

Rock-cut caves

Further information: Indian rock-cut architecture

Around the same time rock-cut architecture began to develop, starting with the already highly sophisticated and state-sponsored Barabar caves in Bihar, personally dedicated by Ashoka c. 250 BCE. These artificial caves exhibit an amazing level of technical proficiency, the extremely hard granite rock being cut in geometrical fashion and polished to a mirror-like finish.

Probably owing to the 2nd century BCE fall of the Mauryan Empire and the subsequent persecutions of Buddhism under Pushyamitra Sunga, it is thought that many Buddhists relocated to the Deccan under the protection of the Andhra dynasty, thus shifting the cave-building effort to western India: an enormous effort at creating religious caves (usually Buddhist or Jain) continued there until the 2nd century CE, culminating with the Karla Caves or the Pandavleni Caves. These caves generally followed an apsidal plan with a stupa in the back for the chaityas, and a rectangular plan with surrounding cells for the viharas. Numerous donors provided the

Funds for the building of these caves and left donation inscriptions, including laity, members of the clergy, government officials, and even foreigners.

The construction of caves would wane after the 2nd century CE, possibly due to the rise of Mahayana Buddhism and the associated intense architectural and artistic production in Gandhara and Amaravati. The building of rock-cut caves would revive briefly in the 5th century CE, with the magnificent achievements of Ajanta and Ellora, before finally subsiding as Hinduism replaced Buddhism in the sub-continent, and stand-alone temples became more prevalent.

Rock-cut architecture also developed with the apparition of stepwells in India, dating from 200–400 CE. Subsequently, the construction of wells at Dhank (550–625 CE) and stepped ponds at Bhinmal (850–950 CE) took place.

Decorated stupas

Further information: Stupa

Stupas were soon to be richly decorated with sculptural reliefs, following the first attempts at Sanchi Stupa No.2 (125 BCE). Full-fledged sculptural decorations and scenes of the life of the Buddha would soon follow at Bharhut (115 BCE), Bodh Gaya (60 BCE), Mathura (125–60 BCE), again at Sanchi for the elevation of the toranas (1st century BCE/CE) and then Amaravati (1st–2nd century CE). The decorative embellishment of stupas also had a considerable development in the northwest in the area of Gandhara, with decorated stupas such as the Butkara Stupa ("monumentalized" with Hellenistic decorative elements from the 2nd century BCE) or the Loriyan Tangai stupas (2nd century CE). Stupa architecture was adopted in Southeast and East Asia, where it became prominent as a Buddhist monument used for enshrining sacred relics. The Indian gateway arches, the torana, reached East Asia with the spread of Buddhism. Some scholars hold that torii derives from the torana gates at the Buddhist historic site of Sanchi (3rd century BCE – 11th century CE).

  • Sanchi Stupa No.2, the earliest known stupa with important displays of decorative reliefs, c. 125 BCE. Sanchi Stupa No.2, the earliest known stupa with important displays of decorative reliefs, c. 125 BCE.
  • East Gateway and Railings of Bharhut Stupa. Sculptured railings: 115 BCE, toranas: 75 BCE. East Gateway and Railings of Bharhut Stupa. Sculptured railings: 115 BCE, toranas: 75 BCE.
  • The Great Stupa at Sanchi. Decorated toranas built from the 1st century BCE to the 1st century CE. The Great Stupa at Sanchi. Decorated toranas built from the 1st century BCE to the 1st century CE.
  • Amaravati Stupa relief Amaravati Stupa relief
  • Geometrical decorations, Dhamekh stupa 500 CE Geometrical decorations, Dhamekh stupa 500 CE

Stand-alone temples

Temples—built on elliptical, circular, quadrilateral, or apsidal plans—were initially constructed using brick and timber. Some temples of timber with wattle-and-daub may have preceded them, but none remain to this day.

Domed Buddhist temple 1st-2nd century ADFile:Sannati Dome temple.jpgDomed temple from Sannati 1st-2nd century ADGumbatona Vihara, Gandhara, 1st-2nd century AD
Tulja Lena Chaitya cave plan and elevation 50 BC
Circular dome temples

Some of the earliest free-standing temples may have been of a circular type, as the Bairat Temple in Bairat, Rajasthan, formed of a central stupa surrounded by a circular colonnade and an enclosing wall. It was built during the time of Ashoka, and near it were found two of Ashoka's Minor Rock Edicts. Ashoka also built the Mahabodhi Temple in Bodh Gaya c. 250 BCE, also a circular structure, in order to protect the Bodhi tree under which the Buddha had found enlightenment. Representations of this early temple structure are found on a 100 BCE relief sculpted on the railing of the stupa at Bhārhut, as well as in Sanchi. From that period the Diamond throne remains, an almost intact slab of sandstone decorated with reliefs, which Ashoka had established at the foot of the Bodhi tree. These circular-type temples were also found in later rock-hewn caves such as Tulja Caves or Guntupalli.

Apsidal temples

Another early free-standing temple in India, this time apsidal in shape, appears to be Temple 40 at Sanchi, which is also dated to the 3rd century BCE. It was an apsidal temple built of timber on top of a high rectangular stone platform, 26.52x14x3.35 metres, with two flights of stairs to the east and the west. The temple was burnt down sometime in the 2nd century BCE. This type of apsidal structure was also adopted for most of the cave temple (Chaitya-grihas), as in the 3rd century BCE Barabar Caves and most caves thereafter, with side, and then frontal, entrances. A freestanding apsidal temple remains to this day, although in a modified form, in the Trivikrama Temple in Ter, Maharashtra.

  • Illustration of Temple 40 at Sanchi, dated to the 3rd century BCE. Illustration of Temple 40 at Sanchi, dated to the 3rd century BCE.
  • Trivikrama Temple at Ter: an early Buddhist apsidal temple, in front of which was later added an Hindu square mandapa. Trivikrama Temple at Ter: an early Buddhist apsidal temple, in front of which was later added an Hindu square mandapa.
  • Chejarla apsidal temple, also later converted to Hinduism. Chejarla apsidal temple, also later converted to Hinduism.
Truncated pyramidal temples
The Mahabodhi Temple in 150–200 CE.
The Mahabodhi Temple: a stepped pyramid with round stupa on top.

It is thought that the temple in the shape of a truncated pyramid was derived from the design of the stepped stupas which had developed in Gandhara. The Mahabodhi Temple in Bodh Gaya is one such example, adapting the Gandharan design of a succession of steps with niches containing Buddha images, alternating with Greco-Roman pillars, as seen in the stupas of Jaulian. The structure is crowned by the shape of an hemispherical stupa topped by finials, forming a logical elongation of the stepped Gandharan stupas.

Although the current structure of the Mahabdhodi Temple dates to the Gupta period (5th century CE), the "Plaque of Mahabhodi Temple", discovered in Kumrahar and dated to 150–200 CE based on its dated Kharoshthi inscriptions and combined finds of Huvishka coins, suggests that the pyramidal structure already existed in the 2nd century CE. This is confirmed by archaeological excavations in Bodh Gaya.

This truncated pyramid design also marked the evolution from the aniconic stupa dedicated to the cult of relics, to the iconic temple with multiple images of the Buddha and Bodhisattvas. This design was very influential in the development of later Hindu temples.

Square prostyle temples
A Gupta period tetrastyle prostyle Buddhist temple of Classical appearance at Sanchi (Temple 17) (5th century CE).

The Gupta Empire later also built Buddhist stand-alone temples (following the great cave temples of Indian rock-cut architecture), such as Temple 17 at Sanchi, dating to the early Gupta period (5th century CE). It consists of a flat roofed square sanctum with a portico and four pillars. From an architectural perspective, this is a tetrastyle prostyle temple of Classical appearance . The interior and three sides of the exterior are plain and undecorated but the front and the pillars are elegantly carved, not unlike the 2nd century rock-cut cave temples of the Nasik Caves. Nalanda and Valabhi universities, housing thousands of teachers and students, flourished between the 4th–8th centuries.

Palatial architecture

an Indian palace depiction in Mahabodhi railing, showing vaulted underground chambers called ''suranga,'' as described by Kautiliya in Arthashastra; Shunga period, 2nd-1st BCE

Archaeological excavation conducted by Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) at Kausambi revealed a palace with its foundations going back to 8th century BCE until 2nd century CE; and built in six phases. The last phase dated to 1st - 2nd century CE, featured an extensive structure which was divided into three blocks and enclosed two galleries. There was a central hall in the central block and presumably used as an audience hall surrounded by rooms which served as a residential place for the ruler. The entire structure was constructed using bricks and stones and two layers of lime were plastered on it. The palace had a vast network of underground chambers also called Suranga by Kautilya in his Arthashastra, and the superstructure and the galleries were made on the principle of true arch. The four-centered pointed arch was used to span narrow passageways and segmental arch for wider areas. The superstructure of the central and eastern block was examined to have formed part of a dome that adorned the building. The entire galleries and superstructure were found collapsed under 5 cm thick layer of ash which indicates destruction of the palace through conflagration.

A palace architecture has also been uncovered at Nagarjunakonda.

Shikhara

early evidence of Shikhara type domical crowing structure has been noted in the palatial architecture of Kausambi dated to 1st-2nd century AD. The central hall was thought to be topped by a dome but analysis of the bricks indicate Shikara type structure was used instead. Evidence also indicates Shikhara was also used in crowing architecture such as Bhitargaon temple.

Theater and stadium

Satavahanas constructed a stadium and a theater at Nagarjunakonda in the 2nd century AD. The theater has a small quadrangular open area enclosed on all four sides by stepped stands which are made of bricks and cladded with limestone .

An oblong shaped stadium dating form the same era consisted of an arena which was enclosed on all four sides by flight of steps with each step measuring two feet wide and a pavilion which was situated on the west end. At the top of the arena there was a en eleven feet wide platform. The area of arena was 309 X 259 feet and 15 feet deep. Entire construction was done using burnt brick.

Entrance to the Badami FortBadami Northern Fort Entrance

Fortification

5th century Nalrajar fortification wall

Nalrajar Garh fortification wall ruins dating back to 5th century AD are probably the only standing fortification ruins from Gupta period which are located in a dense jungle in North Bengal near Indo-Bhutan border. A prominent feature of its fortification walls are two parabolic arches. Many fortified cities like Nalrajar Garh, Bhitagarh had risen in Northeastern India owing to trade activities with south eastern China.

Badami or Pulakeshi fort from Chalukya era date back to the 6th century AD

End of the Classical period

This period ends with the destructive invasions of the Alchon Huns in the 6th century CE. During the rule of the Hunnic king Mihirakula, over a thousand Buddhist monasteries throughout Gandhara are said to have been destroyed. The Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang, writing in 630 CE, explained that Mihirakula ordered the destruction of Buddhism and the expulsion of monks. He reported that Buddhism had drastically declined, and that most of the monasteries were deserted and left in ruins.

Although only spanning a few decades, the invasions had long-term effects on India, and in a sense brought an end to Classical India. Soon after the invasions, the Gupta Empire, already weakened by these invasions and the rise of local rulers, ended as well. Following the invasions, northern India was left in disarray, with numerous smaller Indian powers emerging after the crumbling of the Guptas.

Early Middle Ages (550 CE–1200 CE)

Main articles: Hindu architecture and Hindu temple architecture
Kailasa temple, Ellora, the largest rock-cut Hindu temple.

South Indian temple architecture—visible as a distinct tradition during the 7th century CE.

Māru-Gurjara temple architecture originated somewhere in the 6th century in and around areas of Rajasthan. Māru-Gurjara Architecture shows the deep understanding of structures and refined skills of Rajasthani craftsmen of the bygone era. Māru-Gurjara Architecture has two prominent styles Maha-Maru and Maru-Gurjara. According to M. A. Dhaky, Maha-Maru style developed primarily in Marudesa, Sapadalaksha, Surasena and parts of Uparamala whereas Maru-Gurjara originated in Medapata, Gurjaradesa-Arbuda, Gurjaradesa-Anarta and some areas of Gujarat. Scholars such as George Michell, M.A. Dhaky, Michael W. Meister and U.S. Moorti believe that Māru-Gurjara Temple Architecture is entirely Western Indian architecture and is quite different from the North Indian Temple architecture. There is a connecting link between Māru-Gurjara Architecture and Hoysala Temple Architecture. In both of these styles architecture is treated sculpturally. Regional styles include Architecture of Karnataka, Kalinga architecture, Dravidian architecture, Western Chalukya architecture, and Badami Chalukya Architecture.

Navghan Kuvo, Gujarat, 11th century

The South Indian temple consists essentially of a square-chambered sanctuary topped by a superstructure, tower, or spire and an attached pillared porch or hall (maṇḍapa or maṇṭapam), enclosed by a peristyle of cells within a rectangular court. The external walls of the temple are segmented by pilasters and carry niches housing sculpture. The superstructure or tower above the sanctuary is of the kūṭina type and consists of an arrangement of gradually receding stories in a pyramidal shape. Each story is delineated by a parapet of miniature shrines, square at the corners and rectangular with barrel-vault roofs at the centre.

North Indian temples showed increased elevation of the wall and elaborate spire by the 10th century. Richly decorated temples—including the complex at Khajuraho—were constructed in Central India. Indian traders brought Indian architecture to South east Asia through various trade routes. Grandeur of construction, beautiful sculptures, delicate carvings, high domes, gopuras and extensive courtyards were the features of temple architecture in India. Examples include the Lingaraj Temple at Bhubaneshwar in Odisha, Sun Temple at Konark in Odisha, Brihadeeswarar Temple at Thanjavur in Tamil Nadu.

Ancient Indian arches

Indian architecture has utilized mix of false and true arches in its architecture

Corbel arches

Corbel arches in India date from Indus Valley Civilisation which used corbel arch to construct drains and have been evidenced at Mohenjo daro, Harappa, and Dholavira.

The oldest arches surviving in Indian architecture are the gavaksha or "chaitya arches" found in ancient rock-cut architecture, and agreed to be copied from versions in wood which have all perished. These often terminate a whole ceiling with a semi-circular top; wooden roofs made in this way can be seen in carved depictions of cities and palaces. A number of small early constructed temples have such roofs, using corbelled construction, as well as an apsidal plan; the Trivikrama Temple at Ter, Maharashtra is an example. The arch shape survived into constructed Indian architecture, not as an opening in a wall but as a blind niche projection from a wall, that bears only its own weight. In this form it became a very common and important decorative motif on Hindu temples.

The "fundamental architectural principle of the constructed Hindu temple is always formulated in the trabeate order", that is to say using post and lintel systems with vertical and horizontal members. According to George Michell: "Never was the principle of the arch with radiating components, such as voussoirs and keystones, employed in Hindu structures, either in India or in other parts of Asia. It was not so much that Hindu architects were ignorant of these techniques, but rather that conformance to tradition and adherence to precedents were firm cultural attitudes". Harle describes the true arch as "not unknown, but almost never employed by Hindu builders", and its use as "rare, but widely dispersed".

Arch

The 19th century archaeologist Alexander Cunningham, head of the Archaeological Survey of India, at first believed that due to the total absence of arches in Hindu temples, they were alien to Indian architecture, but several pre-Islamic examples bear testimony to their existence, as explained by him in the following manner:

Formerly it was the settled belief of all European enquirers that the ancient Hindus were ignorant of the Arch. This belief no doubt arose from the total absence of arches in any of the Hindu Temples. Thirty years ago I shared this belief with Mr. Fergusson, when I argued that the presence of arches in the great Buddhist Temple at Buddha Gaya proved that the building could not have been erected before the Muhammadan conquest. But during my late employment in the Archeological Survey of India several buildings of undoubted antiquity were discovered in which both vaults and arches formed part of the original construction.

— Alexander Cunningham, Mahâbodhi, or the great Buddhist temple under the Bodhi tree at Buddha-Gaya, 1892

Archaeological evidences indicate that wedge shaped bricks and construction of wells in the Indus valley civilization and although no true arches have been discovered as of yet, these bricks would have been suitable in the construction of true arches. True arch in India dates from pre Mauryan Nanda period from 5th century BC. Arch fragment discovered by archaeologist K. P. Jayaswal from an arch with Brahmi inscribed on it, or 1st - 2nd century CE when it first appeared in Kausambi palace architecture from Kushana period. Arches present at Vishnu temples at Deo Baranark, Amb and Kafir Kot temples from Hindu Shahi period and Hindu temple of Bhitargaon bear testimony to the use arches in the Hindu temple architecture. Although Alexander Cunningham has persisted in the notion that the Buddhist Mahabodhi Temple's pointed arch was added later during a Burmese restoration, given its predominant use in Islamic architecture, scholars such as Huu Phuoc Le have contested this assumption based on analysis that relieving arches could not have been added without destroying the entire temple structure, which is dated to 6th-7th century CE. Hence the pointed and relieving arches much have formed part of the original building dating from the pre-Islamic periods in proper. Moreover, pointed arches vaulted entrances have been noted in Bhitargaon temple and Kausambi Palace architecture as well.

Fortification

Evidence indicates that the construction of fortification walls at Dehli applied nearly the same principle at Red Fort and Agra Fort as was the tradition during pre Islamic Rajput periods. Excavation of Lal Kot beneath the Purana Qila revealed ruins which was constructed using similar method as in the post Islamic and Mughal Periods.

Late Middle Ages (1100 CE–1526 CE)

Further information: Indo-Islamic architecture, Hoysala architecture, and Vijayanagara architecture

Hoysala architecture

Hoysala architecture is the distinctive building style developed under the rule of the Hoysala Empire in the region historically known as Karnata, today's Karnataka, India, between the 11th and the 14th centuries. Large and small temples built during this era remain as examples of the Hoysala architectural style, including the Chennakesava Temple at Belur, the Hoysaleswara Temple at Halebidu, and the Kesava Temple at Somanathapura. Other examples of fine Hoysala craftmanship are the temples at Belavadi, Amrithapura, and Nuggehalli. Study of the Hoysala architectural style has revealed a negligible Indo-Aryan influence while the impact of Southern Indian style is more distinct. A feature of Hoysala temple architecture is its attention to detail and skilled craftsmanship. The temples of Belur and Halebidu are proposed UNESCO world heritage sites. Approximately 100 Hoysala temples survive today.

Vijaynagara architecture

aerial image of a temple campus.
An aerial view of the Meenakshi Temple from the top of the southern gopuram, looking north. The temple was rebuilt by the Vijayanagar Empire and an example of Dravidian architecture.

Vijayanagara Architecture of the period (1336–1565 CE) was a notable building style evolved by the Vijayanagar empire that ruled most of South India from their capital at Vijayanagara on the banks of the Tungabhadra River in present-day Karnataka. The architecture of the temples built during the reign of the Vijayanagara empire had elements of political authority. This resulted in the creation of a distinctive imperial style of architecture which featured prominently not only in temples but also in administrative structures across the deccan. The Vijayanagara style is a combination of the Chalukya, Hoysala, Pandya and Chola styles which evolved earlier in the centuries when these empires ruled and is characterised by a return to the simplistic and serene art of the past.

Early Indo-Islamic architecture

The earliest examples of Indo-Islamic Architecture were constructed during this period by the Delhi Sultanates, most famously the Qutb Minar complex, which was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1993. The complex consists of Qutb Minar, a brick minaret commissioned by Qutub-ud-Din Aibak, as well as other monuments built by successive Delhi Sultans. Alai Minar, a minaret twice the size of Qutb Minar was commissioned by Alauddin Khilji but never completed. Other examples include the Tughlaqabad Fort and Hauz Khas Complex.

Early Modern period (1500 CE–1858 CE)

Rajput architecture

the Mughal architecture and painting influenced indigenous Rajput styles of art and architecture. Rajput Architecture represents different types of buildings, which may broadly be classed either as secular or religious. The secular buildings are of various scales. These include temples, forts, stepwells, gardens, and palaces. The forts were specially built for defense and military purposes due to the Islamic invasions.

Rajput Architecture continued well into the 20th and 21st centuries, as the rulers of the princely states of British India commissioned vast palaces and other buildings, such as the Albert Hall Museum, Lalgarh Palace, and Umaid Bhawan Palace. These usually incorporated European styles as well, a practice which eventually led to the Indo-Saracenic style.

Buddhist architecture

Further information: Buddhist architecture

Buddhist architecture developed in the Indian subcontinent. Three types of structures are associated with the religious architecture of early Buddhism: monasteries (viharas), places to venerate relics (stupas), and shrines or prayer halls (chaityas, also called chaitya grihas), which later came to be called temples in some places. The initial function of a stupa was the veneration and safe-guarding of the relics of Gautama Buddha. The earliest surviving example of a stupa is in Sanchi (Madhya Pradesh). In accordance with changes in religious practice, stupas were gradually incorporated into chaitya-grihas (prayer halls). These are exemplified by the complexes of the Ajanta Caves and the Ellora Caves (Maharashtra). The Mahabodhi Temple at Bodh Gaya in Bihar is another well-known example. The Pagoda is an evolution of the Indian stupa.

Mughal Empire

Further information: Mughal architecture
Humayun's Tomb, Delhi, the first fully developed Mughal imperial tomb, 1569–70 CE.

The most famous Indo-Islamic style is Mughal architecture. Its most prominent examples are the series of imperial mausolea, which started with the pivotal Tomb of Humayun, but is best known for the Taj Mahal. It is known for features including monumental buildings surrounded by gardens on all four sides, and delicate ornamentation work, including pachin kari decorative work and jali-latticed screens.

Red Fort was the main residence of the Mughal emperors for nearly 200 years, until 1856.

The Red Fort at Agra (1565–74) and the walled city of Fatehpur Sikri (1569–74) are among the architectural achievements of this time—as is the Taj Mahal, built as a tomb for Queen Mumtaz Mahal by Shah Jahan (1628–58). Employing the double dome, the recessed archway, the depiction of any animal or human—an essential part of the Indian tradition—was forbidden in places of worship under Islam. The Taj Mahal does contain tilework of plant ornaments. The architecture during the Mughal Period, with its rulers being of Turco-Mongol origin, has shown a notable blend of Indian style combined with the Islamic. Taj Mahal in Agra, India is one of the wonders of the world.

Regional styles

The Bahmani and Deccan sultanates in the Southern regions of the Indian subcontinent developed the Indo-Islamic architectural styles of the Deccan. The notable examples are Charminar, Mecca Masjid, Qutb Shahi Tombs, Madrasa Mahmud Gawan and Gol Gumbaz.

Within the Indian subcontinent, the Bengal region developed a distinct regional style under the independent Bengal Sultanate. It incorporated influences from Persia, Byzantium and North India, which were with blended indigenous Bengali elements, such as curved roofs, corner towers and complex terracotta ornamentation. One feature in the sultanate was the relative absence of minarets. Many small and medium-sized medieval mosques, with multiple domes and artistic niche mihrabs, were constructed throughout the region. The grand mosque of Bengal was the 14th century Adina Mosque, the largest mosque in the Indian subcontinent. Built of stone demolished from temples, it featured a monumental ribbed barrel vault over the central nave, the first such giant vault used anywhere in the subcontinent. The Sultanate style flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. A provincial style influenced by North India evolved in Mughal Bengal during the 17th and 18th centuries. The Mughals also copied the Bengali do-chala roof tradition for mausoleums in North India.

Maratha architecture

Shaniwarwada palace fort in Pune, it was the seat of the Peshwa rulers of the Maratha Empire until 1818.Thanjavur Maratha palace is the official residence of the Bhonsle family.

The Marathas ruled over much of the Indian subcontinent from the mid-17th to the early 19th centuries. Their religious activity took full shape and soon the skylines of Maharashtrian towns were dominated by rising temple spires. Old forms returned with this 'renewal' of Hindu architecture, infused by the Sultanate and later the Mughal traditions. The architecture of Maratha period was planned with courtyards suited to tropical climates. The Maratha Architecture is known for its simplicity, visible logic and austere aesthetic, made rich by beautiful detailing, rhythm, and repetition. The aisles and arcades, punctured by delicate niches, doors, and windows create space in which the articulation of open, semi-open and covered areas is effortless and enchanting. The materials used during those times for construction were thin bricks, lime mortar, lime plaster, wooden columns, stone bases, basalt stone flooring and brick pavements

Maharashtra is famous for its caves and rock-cut architectures. It is said that the varieties found in Maharashtra are wider than the caves and rock-cut architectures found in the rock-cut areas of Egypt, Assyria, Persia, and Greece. The Buddhist monks first started these caves in the 2nd century BC, in search of serene and peaceful environment for meditation, and they found these caves on the hillsides.

Sikh architecture

Harmandir Sahib is culturally the most significant place of worship for the Sikhs.Akal Takht is one of five takhts (seats of power) of the Sikhs. Further information: Sikh architecture

Sikh Architecture is a style of architecture that is characterized by values of progressiveness, exquisite intricacy, austere beauty and logical flowing lines. Due to its progressive style, it is constantly evolving into many newly developing branches with new contemporary styles. Although Sikh architecture was initially developed within Sikhism its style has been used in many non-religious buildings due to its beauty. 300 years ago, Sikh architecture was distinguished for its many curves and straight lines; Shri Keshgarh Sahib and the Sri Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple) are prime examples.

Sikh architecture is heavily influenced by Mughal and Rajput styles of architecture. The use of onion domes, frescoes, multi-foil arches, paired pilasters, in-lay work, are of Mughal origin while chattris, oriel windows and ornamented friezes, are a Rajput influence.

European colonial architecture

As with the Mughals, under European colonial rule, architecture became an emblem of power, designed to endorse the occupying power. Numerous European countries invaded India and created architectural styles reflective of their ancestral and adopted homes. The European colonizers created architecture that symbolized their mission of conquest, dedicated to the state or religion.

The British, French, Dutch and the Portuguese were the main European powers that colonized parts of India.

British Colonial Era: 1615–1947

Lutyens' DelhiThe Rashtrapati Bhavan was built for the British Viceroy. It now serves as the official residence of the President of India.India Gate is a memorial to 70,000 soldiers of the British Indian Army who died in the First World WarThe Secretariat Building is located in the North Block.Sansad Bhawan which houses the Parliament of India.Lutyens' Delhi,designed by Edwin Lutyens, houses all key government buildings of India.

The British arrived in 1615 and over the centuries, gradually overthrew the Maratha and Sikh empires and other small independent kingdoms. Britain was present in India for over three hundred years and their legacy still remains through some building and infrastructure that exist in their former colonies. The major cities colonized during this period were Madras, Calcutta, Bombay, Delhi, Agra, Bankipore, Karachi, Nagpur, Bhopal and Hyderabad, which saw the rise of Indo-Saracenic Revival architecture.

Rashtrapati Niwas at Shimla designed by Henry Irwin in the Jacobethan style and built in the late 19th century.

Black Town described in 1855 as "the minor streets, occupied by the natives are numerous, irregular and of various dimensions. Many of them are extremely narrow and ill-ventilated ... a hallow square, the rooms opening into a courtyard in the centre." Garden houses were originally used as weekend houses for recreational use by the upper class British. Nonetheless, the garden house became ideal a full-time dwelling, deserting the fort in the 19th Century.

Mumbai, (then known as Bombay) has some of the most prominent examples of British colonial architecture. This included the gothic revival (Victoria terminus, University of Mumbai, Rajabai Clock Tower, High Court, BMC Building), Indo-Saracenic (Prince of Wales Museum, Gateway of India, Taj Mahal Palace Hotel) and art deco (Eros Cinema, New India Assurance Building).

Calcutta – Madras and Calcutta were similarly bordered by water and division of Indian in the north and British in the south. An Englishwoman noted in 1750 "the banks of the river are as one may say absolutely studded with elegant mansions called here as at Madras, garden houses." Esplanade-row is fronts the fort with lined palaces. Indian villages in these areas consisted of clay and straw houses which later transformed into the metropolis of brick and stone.

Madras High Court buildings are a prime example of Indo-Saracenic architecture, designed by JW Brassington under the guidance of British architect Henry Irwin.

Indo-Saracenic

Further information: Indo-Saracenic Revival architecture

Indo-Saracenic architecture evolved by combining Indian architectural features with European styles. Vincent Esch and George Wittet were pioneers in this style.

The Victoria Memorial in Calcutta is the most effective symbolism of British Empire, built as a monument in tribute to Queen Victoria's reign. The plan of the building consists of one large central part covered with a larger dome. Colonnades separate the two chambers. Each corner holds a smaller dome and is floored with marble plinth. The memorial stands on 26 hectares of garden surrounded by reflective pools.

Neoclassical

Examples of Neoclassical architecture in India include British Residency (1798) and Falaknuma Palace (1893) in Hyderabad, St Andrews Church in Madras (1821), Raj Bhawan (1803) and Metcalfe Hall (1844) in Kolkata, and Bangalore Town Hall (1935) in Bangalore.

Art Deco

The Art Deco movement of the early 20th century quickly spread to large parts of the world. The Indian Institute of Architects, founded in Bombay in 1929, played a prominent role in propagating the movement. The New India Assurance Building, Eros Cinema and buildings along the Marine Drive in Mumbai are prime examples.

Other Colonial powers

The Portuguese had colonized parts of India, including Goa and Mumbai. The Madh Fort, St. John the Baptist Church, and Castella de Aguada in Mumbai are remnants of Portuguese Colonial rule. The Churches and Convents of Goa, an ensemble of seven churches built by the Portuguese in Goa are a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Republic of India (1947 CE–present)

Further information: List of World Heritage Sites in India and Category:Architecture of India

In recent times there has been a movement of population from rural areas to urban centres of industry, leading to price rise in property in various cities of India. Urban housing in India balances space constrictions and is aimed to serve the working class. Growing awareness of ecology has influenced architecture in India during modern times.

The Hall of Nations at Delhi, designed by Raj Rewal, and completed in 1972, was considered one of the finest examples of brutalist architecture in India. However, despite several protests, it was demolished in 2017. It's demolition was considered a tragedy among the architectural community.

Climate responsive architecture has long been a feature of India's architecture but has been losing its significance as of late. Indian architecture reflects its various socio-cultural sensibilities which vary from region to region. Certain areas are traditionally held to be belonging to women. Villages in India have features such as courtyards, loggias, terraces and balconies. Calico, chintz, and palampore—of Indian origin—highlight the assimilation of Indian textiles in global interior design. Roshandans, which are skylights-cum-ventilators, are a common feature in Indian homes, especially in North India.

20th century

At the time of independence in 1947, India had only about 300 trained architects in a population of what was then 330 million, and only one training institution, the Indian Institute of Architects. Thus the first generation of Indian architects were educated abroad.

Panorama of the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad designed by Louis Kahn, and completed in 1961.

Some early architects were traditionalists, such as Ganesh Deolalikar, whose design for the Supreme Court imitated the Lutyens-Baker buildings down to the last detail, and B.R. Manickam, who designed the Vidhana Soudha in Bangalore reminiscent of Indo-Saracenic architecture.

In 1950, French architect Le Corbusier, a pioneer of modernist architecture, was commissioned by Jawaharlal Nehru to design the city of Chandigarh. His plan called for residential, commercial and industrial areas, along with parks and a transportation infrastructure. In the middle was the capitol, a complex of three government buildings – the Palace of Assembly, the High Court, and the Secretariat. He also designed the Sanskar Kendra at Ahmedabad. Corbusier inspired the next generation of architects in India to work with modern, rather than revivalist styles.

Other prominent examples of modernist architecture in India include IIM Ahmedabad by Louis Kahn (1961), IIT Delhi by Jugal Kishore Chodhury (1961), IIT Kanpur by Achyut Kanvinde (1963), IIM Bangalore by B. V. Doshi (1973), Lotus Temple by Fariborz Sahba (1986), and Jawahar Kala Kendra (1992) and Vidhan Bhawan Bhopal (1996) by Charles Correa.

21st century

Skyscrapers built in the international style are becoming increasingly common in cities. This includes The 42 (2019) and The Imperial (2010) by Hafeez Contractor. Other projects of the 21st century include IIT Hyderabad by Christopher Benninger (2015).

Notable ongoing projects in India include the city of Amaravati, Kolkata Museum of Modern Art, Sardar Patel Stadium, World One, and Navi Mumbai Airport.

Gallery

See also

Notes

  1. ^ See Raj Jadhav, pp. 7–13 in Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India.
  2. Rowland, 31–34, 32 quoted; Harle, 15–18
  3. ^ Livingstone & Beach, 19
  4. Rowland, 31–34, 33 quoted; Harle, 15–18
  5. Pruthi, Raj (2004). Prehistory and Harappan Civilization. APH Publishing. ISBN 9788176485814.
  6. U. Singh (2008), pp. 181, 223
  7. Basant, P. K. (2012). The City and the Country in Early India: A Study of Malwa. Primus Books. ISBN 9789380607153.
  8. Schlingloff, Dieter (2014). Fortified Cities of Ancient India: A Comparative Study. Anthem Press. pp. 67 According to GR Sharma's monograph, rampart was built and provided with brick revetment between 1025 and 955 BC. ISBN 978-1783083497.
  9. Sharma, G. R. Indian archaeology a review: 1957-58. Archaeological survey of India. pp. 47-48 In the earliest Period, I, the defences consisted of a mud wall with a burnt brick revetment on the exterior, the latter being available to a height of 42 ft. 5 in. and comprising one hundred and fiftyfour courses of bricks (pl. LX). The first thirty courses from the bottom showed a batter of about 15 deg from the vertical and the upper courses 40 deg, the bricks being laid throughout in the English bond. Up to the first thirty courses the revetment was also covered by a 2- to 1/2-in. thick mud plaster. At a height of about 6 ft. from th bottom there were a number of holes, perhaps weep-holes, situated 6 ft. apart from each other. On the bases of the associated pottery, coins and terracottas the beginnings of the different periods of the defenses maybe dated as follows, Period I, 700 B.C, Period II, 500 B.C, Period III, 300 B.C, Period IV, 50 B.C, and Period V, A. D. 150.
  10. A., Ghosh (1961). Indian Archaeology: A Review 1960-61. New Dehli: Archaeological Survey of India. pp. 33–35.
  11. Bates, Crispin; Mio, Minoru (22 May 2015). Cities in South Asia. Routledge. ISBN 9781317565130.
  12. A., Ghosh (1964). Indian Archaeology: A Review 1961-62. New Dehli: Archaeological Survey of India. pp. 50–52.
  13. Goldberg, Kory; Decary, Michelle (26 June 2012). Along the Path: The Meditator's Companion to the Buddha's Land. Pariyatti. ISBN 9781928706564.
  14. ^ Chandra (2008)
  15. J.M. Kenoyer (2006), "Cultures and Societies of the Indus Tradition. In Historical Roots" in the Making of ‘the Aryan’, R. Thapar (ed.), pp. 21–49. New Delhi, National Book Trust.
  16. Roy, Kaushik (2015). Military Manpower, Armies and Warfare in South Asia. Routledge. p. 27. ISBN 9781317321279.
  17. Kulke, Hermann; Rothermund, Dietmar (2016). A History of India. Routledge. p. 110. ISBN 9781317242123.
  18. John Marshall, A Guide to Sanchi, 1918 p. 58ff (Public Domain text)
  19. Brown, Percy (1959). Indian Architecture (Buddhist And Hindu). pp. 3–5.
  20. The Calcutta University (1923). Proceedinds And Transactions Of The Second Oriental Conference (1923).
  21. Spooner, Brainerd (1924). Annual Report Of The Archaeological Survey Of India 1921-22.
  22. Chandra, Ramaprasad (1927). Memoirs of the archaeological survey of India no.30.
  23. ^ Paul Gwynne (30 May 2017). World Religions in Practice: A Comparative Introduction. Wiley. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-1-118-97228-1.
  24. Jules Barthélemy Saint-Hilaire (1914). The Buddha and His Religion. Trübner. pp. 376–377.
  25. Digha Nikaya 16, Maha-Parinibbana Sutta, Last Days of the Buddha, Buddhist Publication Society
  26. Kailash Chand Jain (1991). Lord Mahāvīra and His Times. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 66. ISBN 978-81-208-0805-8.
  27. Chakrabartia, Dilip K (1976). "Rājagriha: An early historic site in East India". World Archaeology. 7 (3): 261–268. doi:10.1080/00438243.1976.9979639.
  28. ^ Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 97–99
  29. ^ Le, Huu Phuoc (2010). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol. pp. 48–49. ISBN 9780984404308.
  30. "The rubble-built building complex of Jivakamravana at Rajgir probably represents one of the earliest monasteries of India dating from the Buddha's time." in Mishra, Phanikanta; Mishra, Vijayakanta (1995). Researches in Indian archaeology, art, architecture, culture and religion: Vijayakanta Mishra commemoration volume. Sundeep Prakashan. p. 178. ISBN 9788185067803.
  31. Tadgell, Christopher (2015). The East: Buddhists, Hindus and the Sons of Heaven. Routledge. p. 498. ISBN 9781136753831.
  32. Handa, O. C.; Hāṇḍā, Omacanda (1994). Buddhist Art & Antiquities of Himachal Pradesh, Upto 8th Century A.D. Indus Publishing. p. 162. ISBN 9788185182995.
  33. Monuments of Bihar. Department of Art, Culture & Youth, Government of Bihar. 2011. pp. Jivakarama vihara entry.
  34. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), Pagoda.
  35. ^ Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 140–174
  36. ^ Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, p. 143
  37. Khare, M. D. (1975). "THE HELIODORUS PILLAR—A FRESH APPRAISAL, BY JOHN IRWIN ( AARP—ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY RESEARCH PAPERS—DECEMBER 1974 ) A REJOINDER". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 36: 92–97. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44138838.
  38. Agrawala, Vasudeva S. (1977). Gupta Art Vol.ii.
  39. Piercey & Scarborough (2008)
  40. See Stanley Finger (2001), Origins of Neuroscience: A History of Explorations Into Brain Function, Oxford University Press, p. 12, ISBN 0-19-514694-8.
  41. The Early History of India by Vincent A. Smith
  42. Annual report 1906–07 p. 89
  43. Ashoka in Ancient India by Nayanjot Lahiri p. 231
  44. Buddhist architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 98–99
  45. "Ajanta Caves". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 12 March 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  46. ^ Livingston & Beach, xxiii
  47. Centre, UNESCO World Heritage. "Buddhist Monuments at Sanchi". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
  48. ^ Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 149- –150
  49. "De l'Indus a l'Oxus: archaeologie de l'Asie Centrale", Pierfrancesco Callieri, p212: "The diffusion, from the second century BCE, of Hellenistic influences in the architecture of Swat is also attested by the archaeological searches at the sanctuary of Butkara I, which saw its stupa "monumentalized" at that exact time by basal elements and decorative alcoves derived from Hellenistic architecture".
  50. Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), torii
  51. Japanese Architecture and Art Net Users System (2001), torii.
  52. Didactic Narration: Jataka Iconography in Dunhuang with a Catalogue of Jataka Representations in China, Alexander Peter Bell, LIT Verlag Münster, 2000 p. 15ff
  53. World Heritage Monuments and Related Edifices in India, Volume 1 p. 50 by Alī Jāvīd, Tabassum Javeed, Algora Publishing, New York
  54. ^ Le Huu Phuoc, 2009, pp. 233–237
  55. "Sowing the Seeds of the Lotus: A Journey to the Great Pilgrimage Sites of Buddhism, Part I" by John C. Huntington. Orientations, November 1985 p. 61
  56. Buddhist Architecture, Huu Phuoc Le, Grafikol, 2010 p. 240
  57. A Global History of Architecture, Francis D. K. Ching, Mark M. Jarzombek, Vikramaditya Prakash, John Wiley & Sons, 2017 p. 570ff
  58. Hardy, Adam (1995). Indian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation : the Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa Tradition, 7th to 13th Centuries. Abhinav Publications. p. 39. ISBN 9788170173120.
  59. Le, Huu Phuoc (2010). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol. p. 238. ISBN 9780984404308.
  60. ^ Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, p. 147
  61. Abram, David; (Firm), Rough Guides (2003). The Rough Guide to India. Rough Guides. ISBN 9781843530893.
  62. Marshall, John (1955). Guide to Sanchi.
  63. Le, Huu Phuoc (2010). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol. p. 237. ISBN 9780984404308.
  64. ^ Le Huu Phuoc, Buddhist Architecture, pp. 238–248
  65. Le Huu Phuoc, Buddhist Architecture, p. 234
  66. ^ 2500 Years of Buddhism by P.V. Bapat, p. 283
  67. Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), education, history of.
  68. Shastri, K.A. Age Of The Nandas And Mauryas. p. 339.
  69. ^ Gosh, A. (1964). Indian Archaeology: A review 1961-62. New Dehli: Archaeological survey of India. pp. 50–52.
  70. Murthy, K. Krishna (1977). Nagarjunakonda A Cultural Study. Concept Publishing Company.
  71. Sharma, G. R. (1977). Kusana studies.
  72. Varadpande, Manohar Laxman (1987). History of Indian Theatre. Abhinav Publications. ISBN 9788170172215.
  73. Varadpande, M. L. (1981). Ancient Indian And Indo-Greek Theatre. Abhinav Publications. ISBN 9788170171478.
  74. M. N, Deshpande (1975). Indian archaeology: A review 1966-67. Calcutta: Archaeological survey of India. pp. 45–46.
  75. "EARLY FORTIFICATION: AIHOLE, BADAMI, PATTADAKAL, MAHAKUTA AND ALAMPUR" (PDF). {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  76. Behrendt, Kurt A. (2004). Handbuch der Orientalistik. BRILL. ISBN 9789004135956.
  77. Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks by Jason Neelis p. 168
  78. The Spread of Buddhism by Ann Heirman, Stephan Peter Bumbacher p. 60 sq
  79. The First Spring: The Golden Age of India by Abraham Eraly p. 48 sq
  80. Ancient Indian History and Civilization by Sailendra Nath Sen p. 221
  81. A Comprehensive History Of Ancient India p. 174
  82. "Ellora Caves". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 28 February 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  83. Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), South Indian temple architecture.
  84. The sculpture of early medieval Rajasthan By Cynthia Packert Atherton
  85. Beginnings of Medieval Idiom c. A.D. 900–1000 by George Michell
  86. The legacy of G.S. Ghurye: a centennial festschrift By Govind Sadashiv Ghurye, A. R. Momin, p. 205
  87. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), North Indian temple architecture.
  88. Moffett et al., 75
  89. Centre, UNESCO World Heritage. "Group of Monuments at Pattadakal". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
  90. "Archaeological Site of Nalanda Mahavihara at Nalanda, Bihar". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 23 March 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  91. K. D. Bajpai (2006). History of Gopāchala. Bharatiya Jnanpith. p. 31. ISBN 978-81-263-1155-2.
  92. Centre, UNESCO World Heritage. "Group of Monuments at Pattadakal". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
  93. "Great Living Chola Temples". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 12 March 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  94. Lemoy, Christian (2011). Across the Pacific: From Ancient Asia to Precolombian America. Christian Lemoy. ISBN 9781599425825.
  95. Rowland, 44-45, 64-65, 113, 218-219; Harle, 48, 175
  96. Michell, 82
  97. Michell, 84
  98. Harle, 530, note 3 to chapter 30. See also 489, note 10
  99. Harle, 493, note 5
  100. Cunningham, Alexander (1892). Mahâbodhi, or the great Buddhist temple under the Bodhi tree at Buddha-Gaya. London: W. H. Allen. p. 85.
  101. Robinson, Andrew (15 November 2015). The Indus: Lost Civilizations. Reaktion Books. ISBN 9781780235417.
  102. Proceedinds And Transactions Of The Second Oriental Conference (1923). 1923. p. 86.
  103. The Calcutta Review Vol.10, No.1-3(april-june)1924. 1924. p. 140.
  104. Dubey, Lal Mani (1978). "SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE VESARA SCHOOL OF HINDU ARCHITECTURE". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 39: 1000–1006. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44139449.
  105. Meister, Michael W. (26 July 2010). Temples of the Indus: Studies in the Hindu Architecture of Ancient Pakistan. BRILL. ISBN 9789004190115.
  106. Wright, Colin. "Front view of a ruined temple, with sculptured slabs in foreground, Deo Baranark". www.bl.uk. Retrieved 23 April 2019.
  107. "General view of ruined temple at Deo Baranark". Europeana Collections. Retrieved 23 April 2019.
  108. Le, Huu Phuoc (2010). Buddhist Architecture. USA: Grafikol. pp. 246–247. ISBN 978-0984404308.
  109. Rowland, 163-164
  110. District Gazetteers Of The United Provinces Of Agra And Oudh Cawnpore Vol Xix. p. 190.
  111. "The Glorious Kakatiya Temples and Gateways". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 23 March 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  112. MSN Encarta (2008), Hoysala_Dynasty. Archived 2009-10-31.
  113. See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present, p. 134.
  114. The Hindu (2004), Belur for World Heritage Status.
  115. Foekema, 16
  116. See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present, p. 132.
  117. See Carla Sinopoli, Echoes of Empire: Vijayanagara and Historical Memory, Vijayanagara as Historical Memory, p. 26.
  118. See Carla Sinopoli, The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India, C. 1350–1650, p. 209.
  119. See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present, p. 182.
  120. "Qutb Minar and its Monuments, Delhi". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 18 July 2018. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  121. Kossak, Steven; Watts, Edith Whitney (2001). The Art of South and Southeast Asia: A Resource for Educators. Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 9780870999925.
  122. "Hill Forts of Rajasthan". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 12 March 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  123. Achary Tsultsem Gyatso; Mullard, Saul & Tsewang Paljor (Transl.): A Short Biography of Four Tibetan Lamas and Their Activities in Sikkim, in: Bulletin of Tibetology Nr. 49, 2/2005, p. 57.
  124. "Humayun's Tomb, Delhi". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 28 February 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  125. Mukherjee, Anisha (3 June 2018). "Whose fort is it anyway". The Indian Express.
  126. "Fatehpur Sikri". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 12 March 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  127. Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), Mughal architecture.
  128. "Taj Mahal". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 28 February 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  129. Michell, George & Mark Zebrowski. Architecture and Art of the Deccan Sultanates (The New Cambridge History of India Vol. I:7), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, ISBN 0-521-56321-6, p. 14 & pp. 77–80.
  130. "Architecture - Banglapedia". En.banglapedia.org. Retrieved 30 December 2017.
  131. ^ Hasan, Perween (2007). Sultans and Mosques:The Early Muslim Architecture of Bangladesh. United Kingdom: I.B. Tauris. p. 23–27. ISBN 1-84511-381-0.
  132. Petersen, Andrew (2002). Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. Routledge. pp. 33–35. ISBN 1-134-61366-0.
  133. An Advanced History of Modern India By Sailendra Nath Sen, p. 16
  134. Bhatti, S. S. (27 September 2007). "An outline of Sikh architecture". sikhspectrum.com. Retrieved 2 January 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  135. Thapar 2004, p. 122.
  136. Nilsson 1968, p. 9.
  137. ^ "(Brief) History of European – Asian trade". European Exploration. Retrieved 14 October 2011.
  138. Jaffar 1936, p. 230.
  139. Tadgell 1990, p. 14.
  140. Evenson 1989, p. 2.
  141. Evenson 1989, p. 6.
  142. ^ "Victorian Gothic and Art Deco Ensembles of Mumbai". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 28 August 2018. Retrieved 2 January 2019. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  143. Evenson 1989, p. 20.
  144. Dutta, Arindam (29 March 2010). "Representing Calcutta: Modernity, Nationalism and the Colonial Uncanny". Journal of Architectural Education. 63 (2): 167–169. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2010.01082.x.
  145. Nilsson 1968, pp. 66–67.
  146. Thapar 2004, p. 129.
  147. Thapar 2004, p. 125.
  148. "Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (formerly Victoria Terminus)". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 28 February 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  149. "Churches and Convents of Goa". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 4 January 2019. Retrieved 2 January 2019. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  150. "The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 1 March 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  151. Bhagwat, Ramu (19 December 2001). "Ambedkar memorial set up at Deekshabhoomi". Times of India. Retrieved 1 July 2013.
  152. "Bahá'í House of Worship at New Delhi". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 12 March 2019. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  153. Mukerji, Arjun; Sanghamitra, Basu. "A Search for Post-Modernism in Indian Architecture". Abacus.
  154. See Raj Jadhav, p. 11 in Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India.
  155. ^ Gast, 77
  156. Gast, 119
  157. ;Langar, Suneet Zishan (23 June 2017). "The Demolition of Delhi's Hall of Nations Reveals India's Broken Attitude to Architectural Heritage". ArchDaily. Retrieved 23 March 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  158. ^ See Raj Jadhav, 13 in Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India.
  159. Savage 2008
  160. Thomas George Percival Spear; Margaret Spear (1981), India remembered, Orient Longman, 1981, ISBN 978-0-86131-265-8, ... The bungalow was a typical north Indian one, with a large central room lit only by skylights (roshandans) and a number of others opening out from them ...
  161. Pavan K. Varma, Sondeep Shankar (1992), Mansions at dusk: the havelis of old Delhi, Spantech Publishers, 1992, ISBN 978-81-85215-14-3, ... Thirdly, while obviating direct sunlight, it had to allow some light and air to enter through overhead roshandans ...
  162. "The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 1 March 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  163. ^ Mukerji, Arjun; Sanghamitra, Basu. "A Search for Post-Modernism in Indian Architecture". Abacus.
  164. "World's only mountain that has more than 900 temples". 3 April 2013.

References

  • Chandra, Pramod (2008), South Asian arts, Encyclopædia Britannica.
  • Evenson, Norma (1989). The Indian Metropolis. New Haven and London: Yale University press. ISBN 978-0-300-04333-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Foekema, Gerard (1996), A Complete Guide to Hoysaḷa Temples, Abhinav Publications, ISBN 81-7017-345-0.
  • Gast, Klaus-Peter (2007), Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India, Birkhäuser, ISBN 978-3-7643-7754-0.
  • Harle, J.C., The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent, 2nd edn. 1994, Yale University Press Pelican History of Art, ISBN 0300062176
  • Jaffar, S.M (1936). The Mughal Empire From Babar To Aurangzeb. Peshawar City: Muhammad Sadiq Khan. OU_1 60252. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Keay, John, India, a History, 2000, HarperCollins, ISBN 0002557177
  • Lach, Donald F. (1993), Asia in the Making of Europe (vol. 2), University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0-226-46730-9.
  • Lee Huu Phuoc, Buddhist Architecture, 2009, Grafikol
  • Livingston, Morna & Beach, Milo (2002), Steps to Water: The Ancient Stepwells of India, Princeton Architectural Press, ISBN 1-56898-324-7.
  • Mankekar, Kamla (2004). Temples of Goa. India: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of Ind. ISBN 978-81-2301161-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Michell, George, (1977) The Hindu Temple: An Introduction to its Meaning and Forms, 1977, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-53230-1
  • Moffett, Marion; Fazio, Michael W.; Wodehouse Lawrence (2003), A World History of Architecture, McGraw-Hill Professional, ISBN 0-07-141751-6.
  • Nilsson, Sten (1968). European Architecture in India 1750–1850. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-08225-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Piercey, W. Douglas & Scarborough, Harold (2008), hospital, Encyclopædia Britannica.
  • Possehl, Gregory L. (1996), "Mehrgarh", Oxford Companion to Archaeology edited by Brian Fagan, Oxford University Press.
  • Rowland, Benjamin, The Art and Architecture of India: Buddhist, Hindu, Jain, 1967 (3rd edn.), Pelican History of Art, Penguin, ISBN 0140561021
  • Savage, George (2008), interior design, Encyclopædia Britannica.
  • Tadgell, Christopher (1990). The history of architecture in India : from the dawn of civilization to the end of the Raj. London: Architecture Design and Technology Press. ISBN 978-1-85454-350-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Thapar, Bindia (2004). Introduction to Indian Architecture. Singapore: Periplus Editions. ISBN 978-0-7946-0011-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Rodda & Ubertini (2004), The Basis of Civilization-Water Science?, International Association of Hydrological Science, ISBN 1-901502-57-0.
  • Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003), The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India, C. 1350–1650, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-82613-6.
  • Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003), "Echoes of Empire: Vijayanagara and Historical Memory, Vijayanagara as Historical Memory", Archaeologies of memory edited by Ruth M. Van Dyke & Susan E. Alcock, Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 0-631-23585-X.
  • Singh, Vijay P. & Yadava, R. N. (2003), Water Resources System Operation: Proceedings of the International Conference on Water and Environment, Allied Publishers, ISBN 81-7764-548-X.
  • Teresi, Dick (2002), Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science—from the Babylonians to the Maya, Simon & Schuster, ISBN 0-684-83718-8.
  • Vastu-Silpa Kosha, Encyclopedia of Hindu Temple architecture and Vastu/S.K.Ramachandara Rao, Delhi, Devine Books, (Lala Murari Lal Chharia Oriental series) ISBN 978-93-81218-51-8 (Set)

Further reading

External links

  1. After the Byzantine Hagia Sophia.
Architecture of India
Types
By state
By city
Architecture of Asia
Sovereign states
States with
limited recognition
Dependencies and
other territories
Categories: