Misplaced Pages

:Deletion review/Log/2006 November 24: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Deletion review | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:11, 29 November 2006 editXoloz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users16,915 edits []: closing (del. endorsed)← Previous edit Revision as of 17:31, 29 November 2006 edit undoXoloz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users16,915 edits []: closing (overturn; relist)Next edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page.
--> -->











====]====
:{{la|A Bad Dream}} — (])
(Single by ]) I firstly started this article a months ago before exactly knowing the Music guidelines on this Misplaced Pages. As it was not a single release it was soon redirectered by ], thing I finally accepted. A week ago, I recreated the article though it wasn't an official release yet but a rumour. ] created an AfD process in order to delete the article. Though I firstly strongly opposed finally I accepted his AfD. However, on November 22 the ] official page gave official details for the single release so now there is an official source and a reason to keep the article here: . I'd only wish a quick consensus to remove protection for the page and create the article as now, as I've told, there is an official source. ] 16:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Undelete''' - premise for deleting the article during the AfD was that it was crystal-balling, which might have been the case back then. However, seeing that an official reliable source has confirmed release date of the single , I think there is now a valid ''raison d'être'' for this article to be undeleted. <tt>].]</tt> 17:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Undelete''' per Kimchi. As an aside, Fluence largely knows more about Keane stuff than anyone I've encountered, and I'd suggest giving him a little more credit on the Keane stuff in the future. --] <small>]</small> 20:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Undelete''', however (badlydrawnjeff), please don't give the user free run to recreate articles as he has been. The article WAS speculation, it WAS poor quality (and recreations still are, IMHO), and the user needs to learn how Misplaced Pages works and what belongs here. He also needs to understand that it isn't a game, and isn't about "winning". ] 10:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Endorse deletion''', AfD was clearly in favor of deletion. Only "source" currently cited is primary-when someone ''besides'' the artist's own site has seen fit to comment on this, it can be considered ] and ]. ] 10:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''', in fact, Keanemusic.com was the second source to publish this, a couple of hours after the first one in spite is the artist's official website. Please Seraphimblade check the Music guidelines on the Misplaced Pages where every official single released is notable, of course if it has been officially announced.--] 00:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Undelete''', existency has been confirmed. (Sorry to have made another request, I did not see this one, as is wasn't indicated on the talk page.) ] 02:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:31, 29 November 2006

< November 23 November 25 >
Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 November)

24 November 2006