Revision as of 13:33, 29 November 2006 editKafziel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,921 edits RfA thanks← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:25, 30 November 2006 edit undoParadoxTom (talk | contribs)242 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
I had my doubts about ], but even I couldn't have predicted the way it caught fire and inexorably drifted to the ground in flames, causing quite a stir on its way down. Still, it was encouraging to see the level of support and confidence. Thank you for yours, and I hope I'll still have it the next time around. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | I had my doubts about ], but even I couldn't have predicted the way it caught fire and inexorably drifted to the ground in flames, causing quite a stir on its way down. Still, it was encouraging to see the level of support and confidence. Thank you for yours, and I hope I'll still have it the next time around. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
|} | |} | ||
==] Arbitration== | |||
There is a ] for the ] article. Please provide your inputs.] 03:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:25, 30 November 2006
Humus sapiens is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Home | Talk | List | Tools | Policy | Cmmn | Puzzle | Ubx | Nav |
Archives |
---|
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, |
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, |
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, |
... |
Please scroll all the way down to append your message at the bottom or start a new topic.
? |
|
Template:NotJudaism
You honestly feel that template should be kept?? Anything that is not Judaism can be linked to it. A tree...a bike....a sandwich. C'mon...be reasonable. MetsFan76 05:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- No need for a strawman. See Jews for Jesus, a Christian group that pretends that Christianity and Judaism are the same. ←Humus sapiens 05:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
But that is their belief and should be respected. But to actually have a NotJudaism template is ludicrous. People will link anything to it. MetsFan76 05:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Was this in response to my comment? (It's tabbed that way). -- tariqabjotu 05:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- If I may Humus- the template was at best redundant. Any article about Messianic Judaism that doesn't make clear in the initial introduction the fringe nature of what follows has issues. JoshuaZ 06:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- I hear you. ←Humus sapiens 06:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- The rest of this talk: . ←Humus sapiens 06:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I was about to apologize right before you posted "the rest of this talk," but I see no need for it now. I had every right to my opinion as I found that template incredibly insulting. MetsFan76 06:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Oh, the humanity!
I had my doubts about a second RfA, but even I couldn't have predicted the way it caught fire and inexorably drifted to the ground in flames, causing quite a stir on its way down. Still, it was encouraging to see the level of support and confidence. Thank you for yours, and I hope I'll still have it the next time around. Kafziel 13:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC) |
Jews for Jesus Arbitration
There is a Request for Arbitration for the Jews for Jesus article. Please provide your inputs.ParadoxTom 03:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)