| Revision as of 08:21, 17 August 2019 editMurtaza.aliakbar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,492 edits →Fair: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:49, 17 August 2019 edit undoMurtaza.aliakbar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,492 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| --] (]) 07:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC) | --] (]) 07:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC) | ||
| == Fair == | |||
| Seems fair. Pls point me to the study/research you speak of? | |||
| I see you have made edits. If I were you, I'd leave references to the Dawoodi's usage as a reference. | |||
| As a consequence of your insistence on separating the topics, I am proposing adding a disambiguation for Lisan al Dawat and change all references in the current page to Lisan al Dawat Alawiyah. | |||
| Or ... | |||
| A lot of what's said in the current page holds valid for the Dawoodis side of the equation, too. Perhaps then there must be a Lisan al Dawat page with common information, and two dialect pages with one each for the Alavis and the Dawoodis. | |||
| What is your preference? | |||
| Thanks for reaching out. ] (]) 08:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:49, 17 August 2019
Taslimaat,
Regarding the editing work on Lisan ud Dawat by your side, I respect it. I did extensive studies on the language of both sects viz. Alavis and Dawoodis. Both have totally different approach. The studies on the same has been carried out in IIS, London. To be specific and to get beyond doubt, I added the word "Alaviyah". I request you if possible to create a different page of the Zabaan of Dawoodis and surely with the system which they incorporate. I request you not to intermingle both concepts. Yes, you can definitely give references or links.