| Revision as of 06:00, 1 December 2006 editBalino-Antimod (talk | contribs)65 edits Again removed vandalistic amenaces.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:04, 1 December 2006 edit undoWobble (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,640 edits your threats are emptyNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| :Please do not leave ] "warns" on other user's talk pages. I have engaged in no vandalism. If you were to claim that my actions constituted vandalism then it would amount to every message and every edit constituting "vandalism". Your attempts to use "warning" notices for the purposes of intimidation are in breach of correct wikipedia procedures. Here's how it goes, these warns have a purpose, they are not there to try to "scare" people. If you wanted to refer me to ] you would need to have "warned" me three times. If you had done so and I persisted then you could report me. You would then have to show clearly that I had engaged in ] '''''Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages'''''. I have not engaged in vandalism, and I think if you reported me you would be the one likely to get blocked, or at the least a reprimand. Your crude attempts to manipulate wikipedia policies do not scare me. You cannot block me, an administrator needs to do that and you need to show "vandalism", and you know very well that what I did is not vandalism. I merely translated some foreigh text on someone's talk page, it ammounts to leaving a message. So please report me, I urge you to, because as far as I can see your threats are empty. Never make a threat that you cannot enforce, something every parent learns. ] 06:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:04, 1 December 2006
- Please do not leave spurious "warns" on other user's talk pages. I have engaged in no vandalism. If you were to claim that my actions constituted vandalism then it would amount to every message and every edit constituting "vandalism". Your attempts to use "warning" notices for the purposes of intimidation are in breach of correct wikipedia procedures. Here's how it goes, these warns have a purpose, they are not there to try to "scare" people. If you wanted to refer me to Administrator intervention against vandalism you would need to have "warned" me three times. If you had done so and I persisted then you could report me. You would then have to show clearly that I had engaged in vandalism Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages. I have not engaged in vandalism, and I think if you reported me you would be the one likely to get blocked, or at the least a reprimand. Your crude attempts to manipulate wikipedia policies do not scare me. You cannot block me, an administrator needs to do that and you need to show "vandalism", and you know very well that what I did is not vandalism. I merely translated some foreigh text on someone's talk page, it ammounts to leaving a message. So please report me, I urge you to, because as far as I can see your threats are empty. Never make a threat that you cannot enforce, something every parent learns. Alun 06:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)