| Revision as of 13:58, 21 November 2006 editIdeogram (talk | contribs)11,726 edits →What if ...: in that case ...← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:27, 1 December 2006 edit undoGurch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers109,955 edits oopsNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :No soap. That's only done in cases where the user has long left, had vandal edits only, and had very ''few'' edits. I mean ''very'' few. (The original Bishzilla account had a grand total of one edit.) Or in cases where you have some really good dirt on the 'crat in question. ] ] (so young, yet so cynical!) 12:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC). | :No soap. That's only done in cases where the user has long left, had vandal edits only, and had very ''few'' edits. I mean ''very'' few. (The original Bishzilla account had a grand total of one edit.) Or in cases where you have some really good dirt on the 'crat in question. ] ] (so young, yet so cynical!) 12:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC). | ||
| ::I need to start collecting dirt. --] 13:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | ::I need to start collecting dirt. --] 13:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Oops == | |||
| I officially apologize for my incompetence. Didn't intend for you to stay blocked. Hope that's OK... er, there's a good zilla... aiieeee! *runs away* – ] 22:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:27, 1 December 2006
Hello, Bishzilla, welcome to Misplaced Pages! Bishonen | talk 03:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC).
- Congratulations, it's a Zilla! —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I'm confused. Is this the real Bishonen? – Chacor 07:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Proud separate account, grrr! But please see my userpage, check History for great justice, no confusion intended. And I have just moved the post you so rudely deleted, so no worries. (Bishzilla is a learner, and the man doesn't have a talkpage link in his sig!) Bishzilla 07:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC).
- Heh, my immediate reaction was "impostor account", sorry. I think I get the gist of it (due to the added confusion of this account's block log, and the move log history of the page). – Chacor 07:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Taxman nuked the original abusive account so Her Serene Highness Bishonen could take it over. (Fawningly: don't hurt me, Bishonen!) Check the block log again, please, now much prouder. Bishzilla 07:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC).
- Heh, my immediate reaction was "impostor account", sorry. I think I get the gist of it (due to the added confusion of this account's block log, and the move log history of the page). – Chacor 07:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't know you could do that. Resistance is futile, prepare to be assimilated! --Ideogram 11:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
What if ...
I wanted my own account nuked? --Ideogram 06:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- No soap. That's only done in cases where the user has long left, had vandal edits only, and had very few edits. I mean very few. (The original Bishzilla account had a grand total of one edit.) Or in cases where you have some really good dirt on the 'crat in question.
Bishzilla (so young, yet so cynical!) 12:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC).
- I need to start collecting dirt. --Ideogram 13:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Oops
I officially apologize for my incompetence. Didn't intend for you to stay blocked. Hope that's OK... er, there's a good zilla... aiieeee! *runs away* – Gurch 22:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)