Talk:Nevillean theory of Shakespeare authorship: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:07, 15 December 2016 editMervyn (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users25,693 edits start class← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:40, 7 October 2019 edit undoKfein (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users1,534 edits →Sources that help establish notability and should be incorporated for neutrality Next edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Two of these I found accidentally while trying to find , so I'm curious as to why they haven't appeared yet. {{ping\|RalphWinwood}} how did you not find these? Or if you did, why did you not incorporate them? ] (]) 03:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)		Two of these I found accidentally while trying to find , so I'm curious as to why they haven't appeared yet. {{ping\|RalphWinwood}} how did you not find these? Or if you did, why did you not incorporate them? ] (]) 03:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

			== Proposal for deletion of sentence ==

			Though this is properly sourced, it is false; there is no actual documentary evidence to support this assertion:
			As a boy, Neville was educated within the household of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley.

			I propose deleting it unless someone knows of an independent documentary source that suggests that this is correct. Perhaps someone can give me guidance in how to properly resolve an issue such as this.

			] (]) 05:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:40, 7 October 2019

Shakespeare Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Sources that help establish notability and should be incorporated for neutrality

Hope, Warren; Holston, Kim (2009). The Shakespeare Controversy: An Analysis of the Authorship Theories (2nd. ed.). McFarland. pp. 128-129. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Edmondson, Paul; Wells, Stanley (2013). Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy. Cambridge UP. pp. 54-60. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Carnegie, David; Taylor, Gary (2012). The Quest for Cardenio: Shakespeare, Fletcher, Cervantes, and the Lost Play. Oxford UP. pp. 67-69. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Two of these I found accidentally while trying to find anything else by the publisher of The Truth Will Out, so I'm curious as to why they haven't appeared yet. @RalphWinwood: how did you not find these? Or if you did, why did you not incorporate them? Ian.thomson (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposal for deletion of sentence

Though this is properly sourced, it is false; there is no actual documentary evidence to support this assertion: As a boy, Neville was educated within the household of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley.

I propose deleting it unless someone knows of an independent documentary source that suggests that this is correct. Perhaps someone can give me guidance in how to properly resolve an issue such as this.

Kfein (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Categories: