Revision as of 16:15, 27 November 2006 editJalburrito (talk | contribs)10 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:37, 4 December 2006 edit undoPedant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,934 edits I assume 'Rumsfled' is an unintended wordplayNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. ] 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | *As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. ] 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
*Can someoene add the end of rumsfled's service to the cabinet table? | *Can someoene add the end of rumsfled's service to the cabinet table? | ||
::I like that, but I assume 'Rumsfled' is an unintended wordplay? |
Revision as of 18:37, 4 December 2006
- By taking the policies on WP:BLP seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{fact}}-tagging all unsourced claims HJ 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. St.isaac 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Can someoene add the end of rumsfled's service to the cabinet table?
- I like that, but I assume 'Rumsfled' is an unintended wordplay?