Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Radiant!: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006 | Vote Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:29, 4 December 2006 editBostonMA (talk | contribs)7,570 edits →Oppose← Previous edit Revision as of 18:37, 4 December 2006 edit undoDoc glasgow (talk | contribs)26,084 edits →Support: sNext edit →
Line 85: Line 85:
#'''Support''' absolutely ] 17:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC) #'''Support''' absolutely ] 17:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
#--]|] 18:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC) #--]|] 18:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Without hesitation'''--]<sup>g</sup> 18:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


==Oppose== ==Oppose==

Revision as of 18:37, 4 December 2006

Statement

I’ve been active since December 2004, registered after a few months, and have been an admin since June 2005. My motto is that Misplaced Pages is not a Bureaucracy. Thus, I have done my best to make Misplaced Pages run more smoothly. I have never shied away from examining controversial issues, and use careful reasoning to cut to the heart of them. Indeed, I have been called a voice of reason and progress many times, even by those who disagree with me.

I've written an essay on my wikiphilosophy, or how Misplaced Pages should work. In my view, the ArbCom walks a fine line between guarding the encyclopedia by being lenient to good contributors, and guarding the morale of our volunteer editors by being even-handed. The aim is to be stern where necessary, fair where possible.

Together with a variety of other editors, I have been instrumental in solving or alleviating a number of issues in Misplaced Pages. The most well-known of these solutions is probably Proposed Deletion. Other frequently-cited ones include the present definition of policy and guideline, Centralized Discussion, Misplaced Pages is Not a Bureaucracy, and   n u m e r o u s   others.

Problematic users I have dealt with include Zen-master, Gabrichidze, and to some extent, Willy on Wheels. I've given my thoughts on the Giano case; a recent dispute I have dealt with is TV episode naming, which I looked into after a request for neutral opinion. I have attempted to defuse the situation, mainly using debate, but I felt it necessary to remove an inappropriate poll about one editor's personality, and to temporarily protect the page to stop a revert war over the disputedpolicy tag. I believe there is now a consensus with still some opposition, with the compromise of redirecting the minority name to the consensual name.

I believe I would make a capable arbiter, and if the community so desires I will aid the ArbCom to the best of my abilities.

Questions

Support

  1. --Spangineer (háblame) 00:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 00:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. --Ligulem 00:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Support Titoxd 00:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. I'm Amarkov and I endorse this candidate! -00:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. jaco♫plane 00:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. Support - MER-C 00:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  9. --Majorly 00:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  10. Alex Bakharev 00:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  11. Support Ourai с 00:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  12. Grafikm 00:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  13. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 00:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  14. Support --Salix alba (talk) 00:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  15. Jaranda 00:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  16. - crz crztalk 00:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  17. Support per answers to questions and what I've seen of this editor. Excellent candidate. --Coredesat 00:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  18. Per my interactions. --physicq (c) 00:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  19. BhaiSaab 00:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  20. Hello32020 01:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  21. Khoikhoi 01:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  22. Peta 01:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  23. SuperMachine 01:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  24. Awolf002 01:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  25. Dakota 01:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  26. Dr Zak 01:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  27. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 02:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  28. Just a natural arbitrator! I'm delighted to see him on the list. Bishonen | talk 02:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC).
  29. Mike Dillon 02:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  30. cohesion 02:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  31. Húsönd 03:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  32. Raven4x4x 03:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  33. —Mira 03:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  34. Homestarmy 04:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  35. Terence Ong 04:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  36. Strong Support Radiant combines sound judgment and an inherent sense of fairness with a flair for innovative approaches to problem-solving. He's really quite close to the perfect ArbCom candidate. Xoloz 04:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  37. Support. alteripse 05:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  38. User:Zscout370 05:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  39. Support the editor whose opinions in Misplaced Pages space I have learned to trust. --Irpen 06:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  40. Strong support --Riley 06:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  41. Dylan Lake 06:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  42. Nufy8 06:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  43. Strong support. Excellent candidate. --Alecmconroy 07:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  44. Support. — CharlotteWebb 07:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  45. Support. Ah yes, Radiant!, the first person I nominated for adminship and one of my favorite admins. Like Nandesuka, Radiant is a tough candidate but I trust him to be fair and reasonable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  46. Thumb's up. —Doug Bell  08:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  47. Support Radiant and I didnt always see eye to eye in the past... especially on AFD. But other than the deletionist/inclusionist debate I trust his judgement.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 08:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  48. The most trustworthy arbitrator I can imagine. Opposers should be ashamed. Support! --Ghirla 08:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  49. SchmuckyTheCat 09:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  50. Support had only a brief view of Radiant!'s activities. Like what I've seen.--Zleitzen 09:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  51. Support. --Interiot 10:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  52. Support --Van helsing 10:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  53. Support - Good luck. -- Szvest Ω 10:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  54. Support -- Ferkelparade π 11:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  55. Kusma (討論) 11:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  56. — Nearly Headless Nick 12:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  57. Support Charles Matthews 12:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  58. Strong Support --Neigel von Teighen 12:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  59. Nandesuka 13:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  60. Support - I've disagreed with some recent actions which seemed like 'unnecessary strong-arming' to me, but have found him otherwise consistently well above par in all regards. --CBD 13:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  61. Shyam 14:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  62. Support. From what I've seen, capable enough for the job. -Jeske 14:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    Support Tirronan He has my support. Tirronan 14:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  63. Support Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  64. Support --Mcginnly | Natter 15:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  65. Support *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 15:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  66. Support Carom 16:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  67. Support. Radiant has been very involved in in many facets of Misplaced Pages and he is very familiar with how Misplaced Pages works. In my experience he is also very considerate and his comments are always constructive and insightful. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  68. Support absolutely Dragomiloff 17:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  69. --Conti|✉ 18:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  70. Without hesitation--Doc 18:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose Jd2718 02:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. pschemp | talk 02:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Interactions have left me with an impression of someone who likes to boss others around. Not one to have in a position of influence. Samsara (talk • contribs) 02:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Oppose - I didn't like some of his activities on the policy pages. ATren 03:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. Involved in arbcom level dispute too recently. --Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 03:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Strangely, I agree with Samsara. Wrong temperament, too much of a warrior. Rebecca 03:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. KPbIC 03:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    Oppose per Rebecca. KazakhPol 03:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. THB 05:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  9. Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 05:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  10. Too often involved with ArbCom level disputes which wears down on his reputation, but I think he's a really good user and admin other than that. semper fi — Moe 05:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  11. -- AuburnPilot 05:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  12. Opposition by self-imposed standard regarding recent ArbCom case principles. No prejudice against future candidacy. Serpent's Choice 06:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  13. 6SJ7 07:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  14. Oppose. Everyking 08:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  15. Christopher Parham (talk) 08:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  16. – Chacor 09:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  17. cj | talk 10:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  18. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 13:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  19. Oppose (based on answers to my questions). Shows no understanding that admins can abuse their power. Anomo 14:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  20. Oppose --BostonMA 18:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)