| Revision as of 03:18, 5 December 2006 editKelly Martin (talk | contribs)17,726 edits →Portfolio for ArbCom: add section header← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:35, 5 December 2006 edit undoKelly Martin (talk | contribs)17,726 edits →missing section header added by editorial monkey: response to elaragirlNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| As I said, I'll respond in further detail later. --<font face="Verdana">]]]<small><sup>]|]</sup></small></font> 03:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | As I said, I'll respond in further detail later. --<font face="Verdana">]]]<small><sup>]|]</sup></small></font> 03:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I will make some comments now, which you may respond to at your convenience, or not. | |||
| *Your statement regarding my decorum, sense of unity, calmness, and judgment is conclusory and unsupported. I do look forward to discussing the specific incidents that you believe justify your conclusions in this regard, or, if you cannot produce such evidence, your retraction of the same. | |||
| *I do indeed have issues with certain members of this community, foremost of which is probably Geogre. I am quite thoroughly convinced that Geogre is a liar; I have caught him on several occasions repeating falsehoods about myself and others, and continuing to do so after being challenged for doing so, with evidence to support the claim that his statements were false. A person who persists in telling untrue things after being fairly informed that they are false is a liar, and I believe Geogre meets that definition. I do not suffer liars well. Geogre has consistently used Misplaced Pages's "no personal attacks" policy as a shield against allegations that he is engaged in the practice of spreading falsehood (and it is likely that he will accuse me of personal attacks for making this statement). However, Geogre has placed his character into dispute by choosing to run for the Arbitration Committee; therefore, a careful and critical examination of his character is most certainly in order. If he cannot take the heat of such an examination, he should withdraw his bid. As to evidence of Geogre's lies, these have been amply demonstrated in the past, but I can certainly produce them again given a reasonable time. | |||
| *I am utterly astounded at your attitude regarding criticism of Misplaced Pages. I believe, and have always believed, that all Wikipedians must always be ready to criticize any aspect of Misplaced Pages that they believe is harming the project, openly and frankly. Your suggestion that neither arbitrators nor admins may engage in criticism of Misplaced Pages is therefore absolutely baffling to me. I would very much like for you to explain why you hold this startling belief. | |||
| I look forward to your amplification on the above points. ] (]) 03:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:35, 5 December 2006
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 1 day are automatically archived to User talk:Kelly Martin/Archives/2024 December. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
| Messages left here may not be replied to promptly. If you feel your communication is urgent, you may wish to email this user. |
ArbCom questions
Hi. I'm Ral315, editor of the Misplaced Pages Signpost. We're doing a series on ArbCom candidates, and your response is requested.
- What positions do you hold (adminship, mediation, etc.)?
- Why are you running for the Arbitration Committee?
- Have you been involved in any arbitration cases? In what capacity?
Please respond on my talk page. Your responses would be added immediately, and you and other late-entering users would be noted in Monday's issue as well. Thanks, Ral315 (talk)
Portfolio for ArbCom
On Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Summary table, I added a column "Examples" with links that exhibit a candidate's arbitration skills. My motivation is that as a voter, I don't want to just rely on a candidate's words, but also see their actions. Moreover, I believe a portfolio of "model cases" to remember in difficult situations can be useful for each candidate, as well.
So far I have entered examples for the candidates who registered first (from their questions page), and I'm not sure if and when I will get to yours, so you may want to enter an example or two yourself. — Sebastian (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC) (Please reply on this page.)
- As a former Arbitrator the record is replete with details of my arbitration talent. Since it is quite evident that my candidacy is not very likely to succeed, I'm afraid you'll have to forgive me for not taking the time right now to dig up any of the thousands of edits that I must have made while serving as an Arbitrator or as a member of the Mediation Cabal before that. Thank you for your interest and your thoroughness in gathering the information you need to make an informed decision. Kelly Martin (talk) 07:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you feel that way. I wrote more, but I deleted it because I don't want to bother you with unasked for advice. — Sebastian (talk) 08:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
missing section header added by editorial monkey
I will respond (later, after dinner) with the appropriate diffs and decisions you have made that I disagree with. But in short, the mess here, here, and pretty much everything here make me feel three things.
- You do not exhibit the proper decorum, sense of unity, calmness, and judgment necessary for ArbCom.
- You have issues with members of this community that you have not resolved, as shown by your posts on George's page. This, based on your previous actions, makes me less than hopeful you will act with moderation in arbitrations.
- You are critical of both Misplaced Pages's process and it's community, preferring to trust your own sense of what's right and good for Misplaced Pages. This isn't your job as an admin, much less as a arbitrator, and disqualifies you utterly.
As I said, I'll respond in further detail later. --Elaragirl 03:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- I will make some comments now, which you may respond to at your convenience, or not.
- Your statement regarding my decorum, sense of unity, calmness, and judgment is conclusory and unsupported. I do look forward to discussing the specific incidents that you believe justify your conclusions in this regard, or, if you cannot produce such evidence, your retraction of the same.
- I do indeed have issues with certain members of this community, foremost of which is probably Geogre. I am quite thoroughly convinced that Geogre is a liar; I have caught him on several occasions repeating falsehoods about myself and others, and continuing to do so after being challenged for doing so, with evidence to support the claim that his statements were false. A person who persists in telling untrue things after being fairly informed that they are false is a liar, and I believe Geogre meets that definition. I do not suffer liars well. Geogre has consistently used Misplaced Pages's "no personal attacks" policy as a shield against allegations that he is engaged in the practice of spreading falsehood (and it is likely that he will accuse me of personal attacks for making this statement). However, Geogre has placed his character into dispute by choosing to run for the Arbitration Committee; therefore, a careful and critical examination of his character is most certainly in order. If he cannot take the heat of such an examination, he should withdraw his bid. As to evidence of Geogre's lies, these have been amply demonstrated in the past, but I can certainly produce them again given a reasonable time.
- I am utterly astounded at your attitude regarding criticism of Misplaced Pages. I believe, and have always believed, that all Wikipedians must always be ready to criticize any aspect of Misplaced Pages that they believe is harming the project, openly and frankly. Your suggestion that neither arbitrators nor admins may engage in criticism of Misplaced Pages is therefore absolutely baffling to me. I would very much like for you to explain why you hold this startling belief.
I look forward to your amplification on the above points. Kelly Martin (talk) 03:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)