Misplaced Pages

:Requests for mediation/Single-party state: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:50, 5 December 2006 editChacor (talk | contribs)13,600 edits Parties' agreement to mediate: rm my agreement (although I still agree an RFM is needed): See talk← Previous edit Revision as of 12:11, 5 December 2006 edit undoI64s (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers19,039 edits Parties' agreement to mediate: agreeNext edit →
Line 40: Line 40:
*Agree; ]]Zach| ] 02:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC) *Agree; ]]Zach| ] 02:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
*Agree. --] 11:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC) *Agree. --] 11:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
*Agree ]]]] 12:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


===Decision of the Mediation Committee=== ===Decision of the Mediation Committee===

Revision as of 12:11, 5 December 2006

Single-party state

view edit delete watch
Filed: 02:28, December 5 2006 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

  • Whether it is POV to call a country a Single Party System when there is proof that it discriminates against other politcal parties

yet other parties still have won seats in their 'parliament'

  • If it is Original Research WPPolicy(see here) to use the above three sources as sources to cite showing Singapore is a single-party system

Additional issues to be mediated

  • Whether the definition of a single-party system must be followed exactly to determine if one country is or isn't one. Quote, "..a single-party state or one-party system or single-party system is a type of party system government in which a single political party forms the government and no other parties are permitted to run candidates for election.."
  • Whether Singapore matches the definition of "de facto" single-party state in the article.
  • Whether the discussion of "de facto single-party states" should be included in the article, or moved to "Dominant-party system".

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept/Reject/Extend: Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
For the Mediation Committee, (Mediation Committee members only.)
Category: