| Revision as of 08:40, 14 November 2006 editComicist (talk | contribs)8,155 edits →RfA thanks!← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:53, 5 December 2006 edit undoJc37 (talk | contribs)Administrators49,011 edits commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :I think I see what happended. One minute before you made your edit, {{user2|Danntannerisgod}} vandalized the article . My caught both Danntannerisgod's vandalism and your edit. I somehow missed Danntannerisgod's edit diff and saw the vandalism as your edit. I apologize for the error, and for my carelessness in analyzing the edits. I certainly did see that the vandalism was out of character for you, and I should have looked at the edit history of The Holocaust again before accusing you of any improper editing. -- '''<font color="navy">]</font><sup><font color="green">(])</font></font></sup>''' 04:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | :I think I see what happended. One minute before you made your edit, {{user2|Danntannerisgod}} vandalized the article . My caught both Danntannerisgod's vandalism and your edit. I somehow missed Danntannerisgod's edit diff and saw the vandalism as your edit. I apologize for the error, and for my carelessness in analyzing the edits. I certainly did see that the vandalism was out of character for you, and I should have looked at the edit history of The Holocaust again before accusing you of any improper editing. -- '''<font color="navy">]</font><sup><font color="green">(])</font></font></sup>''' 04:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Comments== | |||
| First, long time no see : ) - I hope that everything has been well for you. | |||
| I just wanted to mention that while I have to admit laughing at your lightning bug comment, it occurred to me that perhaps the light-heartedness could be misconstrued. I'm not saying that you were wrong to comment (at all), but just consider that this discussion could become strained, and I wouldn't want what has been for the most part, a ] discussion to devolve over something not meant to be an attack, but could be percieved as one. - ] 18:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:53, 5 December 2006
Vandalism of Holocaust on 13 August 2006
What were you thinking when you edited Holocaust? I normally would just slap a {{test}} tag here and move on, but your other edits seem to be appropriate, and your edit to Holocaust appears to be an anomaly. I reverted your edit as vandalism, and I will stand by that description of the edit. -- Donald Albury 10:27, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think I see what happended. One minute before you made your edit, Danntannerisgod (talk · contribs · count) vandalized the article here. My revert caught both Danntannerisgod's vandalism and your edit. I somehow missed Danntannerisgod's edit diff and saw the vandalism as your edit. I apologize for the error, and for my carelessness in analyzing the edits. I certainly did see that the vandalism was out of character for you, and I should have looked at the edit history of The Holocaust again before accusing you of any improper editing. -- Donald Albury 04:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments
First, long time no see : ) - I hope that everything has been well for you.
I just wanted to mention that while I have to admit laughing at your lightning bug comment, it occurred to me that perhaps the light-heartedness could be misconstrued. I'm not saying that you were wrong to comment (at all), but just consider that this discussion could become strained, and I wouldn't want what has been for the most part, a civil discussion to devolve over something not meant to be an attack, but could be percieved as one. - jc37 18:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)